Channel
@happy_egoistka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
464subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624751491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @happy_egoistka |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/happy_egoistka |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 464 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 465 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 468 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 475 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 474 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 474 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
100 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 33 | 33.0% | |
| custom 5285321861796759498 | 29 | 29.0% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 15.0% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 5.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 3.00% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.00% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.00% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.00% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Последний обучающий семинар на обучении по КПТ: работа с зависимостями. Список их, конечно, намного шире, чем мы привыкли думать. 😏 Там и сладости и покупки, и любовная зависимость, и пристрастие к постоянному включению фонового шума и т.д.
👍6custom 52853218617967594981
И что делать? Продолжая тему, предлагаю посмотреть при помощи метафорических карт, где в вашей жизни слишком много контроля. И что помогло бы вам расслабиться) 🔹Задаëм вопрос "Что мешает мне расслабиться? Какую сферу я избыточно контролирую?" 🔹Выбираем карту, пишем номер в комментариях. 🔹Пришлю их в комментариях к этому посту. На мой взгляд, ответы сегодня прям неочевидные 😅 Если что-пишите, помогу разобраться. У…
custom 52853218617967594983👏1🔥1
🫥Почему после выходных всё равно нет сил? Бывает, что выходные закончились, а ощущение отдыха так и не появилось. И дело не всегда в том, что вы мало спали или слишком много делали. 🫥С точки зрения КПТ, наш организм восстанавливается не только тогда, когда мы отдыхаем физически. Ему важно снизить и внутреннее напряжение. Если даже в выходные в голове крутятся мысли: «Надо успеть...» «Я что-то забыла...» «Что будет…
custom 52853218617967594983🤔2😭1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3custom 52853218617967594982
Почему мы замечаем свои ошибки чаще, чем свои успехи? Бывало ли у вас такое? В конце дня кажется, что ничего особенного не произошло. Все мысли почему-то крутятся вокруг того, что не успели, где ошиблись, что можно было сказать по-другому или сделать лучше. А ведь за этот же день вы могли: ✔️ решить сложную задачу; ✔️ поддержать близкого человека; ✔️ закончить важное дело; ✔️ найти время для отдыха; ✔️ сделать мале…
👍3custom 52853218617967594983
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5👏4custom 52853218617967594982
Вчера с коучем увидели, что катастрофически мало трачу времени на себя... Потом, как в тумане, не знаю, как я попала на семейный выход в верëвочный парк 🤣 Жутко боялась, не лазала года два до этого, но разрядка нереальная, конечно. Ещё и Мишу впервые к этому делу "привели" 🥰
custom 52853218617967594984👍3🙏1
Мем дня
🔥9
Лайфхак 😁😁
Куда ты сливаешь деньги? 🔹Задаëм вопрос "Куда я постоянно сливаю деньги?" 🔹Выбираем карту. 🔹Пришлю их в комментариях к этому посту. Карты сегодня выпали нереально красивые вам, эстетический экстаз 😍
custom 52853218617967594984🔥3👀1🙏1
Это бесценно! Встречались с подругами по поводу приезда нашей подруги Саши с Дальнего Востока 🥰 Настолько душевно посидели и пообщались, потом гуляли долго, еле расстались. Такая наполняющая встреча, что не описать, обсудили миллион тем от карьерных до семейных, от психологии до нюансов скульптур животных на улицах Питера 😁
🔥8custom 52853218617967594985
Мем дня
😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @happy_egoistka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свобода быть собой с Ириной Орешко” (@happy_egoistka), 464 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happy_egoistka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.