Channel
@veronika14
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
62,483subscribers
-808 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001547069789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @veronika14 |
| Description | Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b87dcb7a3ee521d24f7e9b Реклама: +7 905 769-88-31 Лера |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/veronika14 |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 62,483 | -81 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 62,564 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 62,566 | -18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 62,584 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 62,589 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 62,598 | -67 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 62,665 | -38 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 62,703 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 62,727 | -21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:08 | 62,748 | -36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 62,784 | -52 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 62,836 | -36 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 62,872 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 62,878 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 62,887 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 62,898 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 62,916 | -40 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 62,956 | -24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 62,980 | -25 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 63,005 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (22 June 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 190,600 |
| Reactions total | 11,693 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 04:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36,083 reactions across 25 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36,083 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,083 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFJJyxpq | 1 | 22 June 2026 | 22 June 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 1 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Я уже как-то писала, что раньше статус друга для меня определялся довольно просто: комфортно ли нам вместе. Сейчас я всё больше дорожу общением, после которого внутри что-то сдвигается. Появляется новая мысль, настроение, желание что-то делать. И недавно подумала, что с пространствами ровно так же. Дом может быть просто удобным. А может каким-то незаметным образом влиять на то, как ты живёшь: чаще выходишь гулять, …
❤190
Еве 9 лет, и её внезапные идеи о будущем: — Ты уже придумала, кем хочешь работать? — Моделью, конечно же. Или врачом. — Мама, когда я поступлю в университет, вы снимете мне квартиру, чтобы я могла жить одна? — Думаю, да. — А смогли бы вы тогда ещё давать мне небольшие деньги раз в месяц, пока я не начну сама зарабатывать? — Евочка, надо постричь ногти, на одном пальчике ноготь врастает. — Всё же не буду рожать… Не…
❤1,650
Люди дают тебе то, кем они являются, а не то, чего ты заслуживаешь. А то, чего ты заслуживаешь, ты даешь себе сам.
❤3,110
Я долго сопротивлялась новым технологиям и, наверное, только последние полгода всерьёз заинтересовалась ИИ. Начала смотреть обзоры на YouTube вместе с мужем, пробовать формулировать промпты, разбираться, что вообще всё это умеет. И знаете, я в приятном изумлении. То, что изначально вызывало у меня много тревоги и сопротивления, неожиданно обернулось ресурсом. Я буквально больше не вычитываю тексты на предмет орфогр…
❤263
Досмотрели сериал «Холод». Высший класс, первый разряд по всем параметрам: драматургия, стиль, игра актёров, диалоги. Но написать хочу о другом. О том, как прицельно этот сериал обнажает нас, зрителей. Как через почти неизбежную симпатию к главной героине проступает наша собственная, вполне общечеловеческая агрессия. Об этом очень подробно пишет Роберт Сапольски в «Биологии добра и зла». Мы любим думать, что мы про…
❤1,350
Мы с Костей в Бодруме, приехали на свадьбу моей близкой подруги Алины и родственника Кости Антона. Причём они познакомились раньше нас. И когда мы с Костей только встретились, я, конечно, первым делом отправила Алине наше совместное фото. Она в этот момент была с Антоном, фото они, конечно, посмотрели вместе и Алина написала мне: «Антон его ооочень хорошо знает. Классный!» Тогда это показалось просто забавным совпа…
❤2,980
Просьба от требования отличается всего одной, не самой очевидной вещью. Просьба всегда подразумевает возможность отказать — и остаться после этого в прежних отношениях. За требованием же, даже самым вежливым, обычно прячется условие: если ты не сделаешь так, как я «прошу», между нами что-то изменится, отношения не останутся прежними. Мне вообще нравится различать эти две вещи. Очень многое становится понятнее и про …
❤2,150
Новый выпуск на YouTube спустя три года тишины — опубликован! Разговор с Анастасией Полетаевой ❤️ Новый сезон выпусков я посвящаю разговорам с публичными людьми на личные темы. Мне очень хотелось создать пространство, свободное от оценок, где каждый гость интересен прежде всего душой, а не достижениями, статусом или тем образом, к которому мы привыкли. Это беседы, в которых каждую минуту помнят: каждый из нас — че…
❤851
Под последней заметкой про мои сложности со сном — больше 350 советов. И, надо сказать, в большинстве своём более чем адекватных. Спасибо вам. Ситуация тем временем значительно улучшилась, и я думаю, что большую роль сыграла смена моего отношения к самому вопросу. Дисциплина вообще занимает в моей жизни довольно много места и обычно работает мне на пользу. Но со сном, кажется, она сыграла злую шутку. Чем старательн…
❤1,800
Обои на телефон🫶
❤1,040
Друзья, у меня бессонница. Реальная, настоящая — не реактивная, когда перенервничал и не можешь уснуть, а совершенно неясного мне происхождения. Сердце стучит, глаза без усилия не закрываются. Что делать? Только, пожалуйста, не пишите про сон в полной темноте и прохладе, отказ от айфона за три часа до сна, мелатонин, валерьянку и всё остальное из базовой гигиены сна — это я и так всегда учитываю.
❤1,040
Вернутся ли к нам еще по-летнему солнечные и теплые дни в этом году? Неизвестно. Но точно знаю, что любой тариф в Т-Бизнесе за полцены – навсегда. При открытии счета до 31 августа. Предсказуемо – и это удобно!
❤441
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @veronika14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 105 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Veronika14” (@veronika14), 62,483 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/veronika14.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.