Какое кино творилось этой ночью в женском теннисе. Надо было не спать! Мирра Андреева вынесла с баранкой Соболенко и таким образом оформила два разгрома подряд с одинаковым счётом 6:4, 6:0 на Итоговом турнире WTA в Индиан-Уэллсе. Сначала 19-летняя россиянка в стартовом матче группового этапа не оставила шансов Элине Свитолиной, повесив ей «баранку» во второй партии. А вчера таким же образом сокрушила вторую ракет…

Channel
PolinaKitsenko
@Polina_Kitsenko
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
106,620subscribers
-320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001513053228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Polina_Kitsenko |
| Description | РКН: https://clck.ru/3F56Gt https://max.ru/Polina_Kitsenko Contact: [email protected] |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Polina_Kitsenko |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 106,620 | +148 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 106,472 | -98 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:57 | 106,570 | +359 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 106,211 | -263 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:39 | 106,474 | +70 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:40 | 106,404 | +254 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 106,150 | -186 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 106,336 | -46 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:06 | 106,382 | +343 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:29 | 106,039 | -664 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:29 | 106,703 | +239 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 106,464 | +30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 106,434 | -387 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 106,821 | +538 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:57 | 106,283 | -507 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 106,790 | -308 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 107,098 | +610 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:16 | 106,488 | +555 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 105,933 | -691 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 106,624 | first reading |
Engagement
264 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.98%
- avg views ÷ 106,620 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,380
- 77 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 78
- of 264 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 264 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 491,262 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈27,300
- Videos
- ≈4,410
- Links
- ≈1,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 36m 51s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 78 posts held from the last 30 days (11.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Хэрродс представил свою рождественскую кампанию «Там, где сходятся звёзды» (Where the Stars Align), превратив универмаг в грандиозное праздничное пространство. Знаменитый фасад засиял невероятными 17 000 огней, дополненными очаровательными рождественскими витринами и программой эксклюзивных мероприятий внутри магазина. За этим волшебством стоит впечатляющее торжество британского мастерства: более 60 специалистов влож…
Ковёр-самолёт в Москве появился. Но я всё равно за то, чтобы идти пешком😉 Тем более когда у прогулки есть сюжет. На набережной у «Мастерской П.Н. Фоменко» придумали квест «Следы Хоттабыча»: искать волшебный сосуд, читать послания на перилах, высматривать следы и потерянную туфлю джинна. Уровень рассеянности последнего мне понятен. Столько перемещений, попробуй ничего не забыть. И вот что любопытно: здесь снимали ре…
У меня не было плана, что выложить в свой день, не было ни фото, ни заготовки, ни идеи. Но утро началось рано, как всегда примерно в 6 и мои девчонки, трио из Тони, мамы и Гали преподнесли мне то, о чем я мечтала- винииииииил. И вот уже у нас есть не план, а потрясающий момент, который я не забуду. Ну что, #пописят? Скажите, вы пьете перед тренировкой? Раз в году и ружье на стене стреляет. Сегодня это я, за мое др…
Обожаю английский бренд Barbour и то, как он уже второй раз сколаборировался с бразильским Farm Rio. Вышло красочно. Главной фишкой нового релиза стало переосмысление фирменной шотландской клетки. Farm Rio превратили строгий тартан в два эксклюзивных принта. Первый вариант выполнен в глубоких коричневых и синих тонах, а второй наполнен яркими тропическими цветами и фирменными банановыми мотивами. В коллекцию вошли…
Damienciaga — это коллаборация Balenciaga и художника Дэмиена Херста, выпущенная к 25-летию сумки Le City. В коллекцию вошли сумки с точками, бабочками и ручной росписью, а также одежда и обувь. В честь юбилея бренд открывает поп-апы Le City House в шести городах, первый из которых заработал в Париже с архивными моделями и сервисом кастомизации. Моей такой первой сумке как раз 25. Имеются несколько. Чудом не отдал…
Photo, posted without a caption
Новак Джокович стал глобальным партнером и сооснователем нового бренда Атма от ультрароскошной сети Aman. Знаменитый спортсмен перенесет свою личную философию биохакинга, диеты и ментальной дисциплины в отельную индустрию премиум-класса, возглавив направления долголетия, нутрициологии, ракеточного спорта и ментального баланса. Первый комплекс Атма откроется в Майами к 2031 году. На первой линии залива Бискейн в райо…
PolinaKitsenko pinned a photo
А я так вдохновлена тем, что работаю над Египетским проектом, и жду этот кемп сама в первых рядах. И собираю вдохновляющие материалы, чтобы наш контент на месте снес с ног, как обычно. Эта съёмка для Vogue Italia, снятая Барри Латеганом в Египте ещё в 1998 году, — безупречный пример фотографии вне времени. Красота этих кадров никогда не поблекнет, и в этой неизменности кроется невероятная сила. Креативный директор- …
В эти дни моя подруга Оксана Лаврентьева отмечает юбилей своего салона Белый сад, самого крутого в Москве. Я оттуда не вылезаю многие годы. Оксана -новатор. Многое, из того, что сегодня является высокими стандартами в столице, придумано ими. Восхищаюсь, поздравляю и спешу туда, как домой всегда. https://t.me/OxanaLavretieva/10253
Ну и сразу в тему, продолжаю вдохновляться Египтом. Журнал Grazia Middle East представил роскошную ювелирную съёмку, посвященную кутюрным украшениям Van Cleef & Arpels с мотивами Древнего Египта. Коллекция переосмысливает исторические символы вроде скарабеев, фараонов и лотосов в высокохудожественных изделиях из золота, изумрудов и лазурита. Не знаю, соберем ли мы такие цацки туда, хотя многие наши очень коллекцион…
Showing the 12 most recent of 264 posts we hold for @Polina_Kitsenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Polina_Kitsenko edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@SlimFitClub · 1,9943 postsМосковский спорт
@MoscowSportOfficial · 45,0972 postsБаррель черной икры
@banki_oil · 543,7021 postРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,4361 postЖурнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 104,3321 post«Москвичка». Красота
@moskvichkabeauty · 52,9931 postСветские крошки LIVE
@svetskiekroshki · 78,4171 postSoroka Diary by Маша Лобанова
@zasorokdiary · 9,6701 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@stroi_mos_ru · 110,1485 postsSOLGAR Россия
@solgarrussia · 15,8874 postsБаррель черной икры
@banki_oil · 543,7021 postРЕШКА
@daria_reshke · 7,5471 postБахчисарайские гвоздики
@darkmgimo · 107,9381 postДвойная сплошная
@double_solid · 105,6821 postDzari
@DrDzari · 262,8081 postМоя Москва
@moscowmi · 1,289,6061 postOne | MR Private
@One_MRPrivate · 1,8051 postОксана Лаврентьева
@OxanaLavretieva · 38,3941 post#SlimFitClub
@SlimFitClub · 1,9941 postТАБОР
@ta_bor · 19,6981 postДворец тенниса «Лужники»
@tennis_luzhniki · 2,4651 postDmitry Tursunov
@TursunovDm · 1,4381 postAvrora TV
@tvavrora · 4,5151 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Polina_Kitsenko named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 September 2026 – 11 September 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@strelets_molodec · 348,609#1
@OxanaLavretieva · 38,394#2
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436#3
@tsypkintherealone · 101,910#4
@sncmag · 299,576#5
@bloodysx · 1,172,481#6
@Lauradjagadiary · 75,482#7
@tetyamotya · 44,319#8
@irena_ponaroshku · 279,022#9
@marinagolomazdina · 118,833#10
@marvelous2309 · 37,999#11
@zasorokdiary · 9,670#12
@ksenia_solovieva · 51,743#13
@SlimFitClub · 1,994#14
@zarkovaira · 35,777#15
@ksbchk · 381,288#16
@imnotbozhena · 503,516#17
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101#18
@tatlersheroine · 102,518#19
@mukhinss · 54,316#20
@minaevlife · 317,610#21
@lovepeacesvet · 53,855#22
@travelstrelets · 55,854#23
@alionadol · 75,423#24
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 355,078#25
@rbc_news · 912,968#26
@ejdailyru · 663,755#27
@spletni_tg · 186,947#28
@kureelka · 124,121#29
@oksanarim1 · 35,671#30
@kseniadenisovna · 33,172#31
@luka_ebkov · 428,911#32
@banksta · 439,852#33
@fashion_mur · 205,098#34
@elenasotnikovaletters · 20,377#35
@moskvichka_mag · 104,332#36
@date_with_cinema · 4,965#37
@lenaperminova_official · 77,529#38
@dashaveledeeva · 6,679#39
@bponline · 111,513#40
@sportchic · 10,704#41
@nataliabobrovaarsvitae · 11,402#42
@shipilovaks · 46,440#43
@ShugaevaNauka · 8,080#44
@prbezposhady · 151,213#45
@yunapugacheva · 28,169#46
@neposlednielyudi · 57,220#47
@svetlanakuznetsova27 · 9,011#48
@darsikdasha · 11,020#49
@temalebedev · 971,105#50
@vika_manasir · 21,498#51
@darkmgimo · 107,938#52
@taynayave4erya · 37,658#53
@svintrovert · 83,244#54
@sysoevfm · 329,829#55
@aleko_n17 · 102,014#56
@tikandelaki · 309,865#57
@dana_manasir · 27,761#58
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,372#59
@ksenia_pozhitkova · 10,837#60
@yana_kushner_valencia · 4,238#61
@dimsmirnov175 · 330,919#62
@retrogrademercury · 161,191#63
@filipchenkova_online · 11,026#64
@happywellness · 76,712#65
@streletskids · 48,266#66
@doveoftheworld · 59,759#67
@mortalbeauty · 46,343#68
@berdovaalena · 143,470#69
@krispotupchik · 150,814#70
@FounderWoman · 44,895#71
@vysotskayaofficial · 61,609#72
@SatiSpivakova · 19,347#73
@maltsevastyle · 3,954#74
@Viva_la_vika · 43,062#75
@svetskiekroshki · 78,417#76
@vitaminluv · 21,024#77
@irinavolskaya_tg · 16,953#78
@forbesrussia · 235,524#79
@tooseriousnotes · 34,264#80
@veronika14 · 62,303#81
@BeliySad_official · 2,595#82
@GALICH_onok · 278,336#83
@mnews_ru · 194,393#84
@theblueprintru · 96,489#85
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,382#86
@kate_blanche · 321,787#87
@russicaru · 420,007#88
@gazinskayavika · 2,597#89
@zlayakiska · 75,212#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@victoriashelyagova · 25,611
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
@demivikademivika · 34,123
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
@zarkovaira · 35,777
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
@letuchayaelena · 30,553
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@TK_eat_pray_learn · 38,665
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PolinaKitsenko” (@Polina_Kitsenko), 106,620 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Polina_Kitsenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.