Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,395–75,757 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 20:00
75,495
-68
17 Sept 2026, 11:39
75,563
-109
15 Sept 2026, 10:19
75,672
+183
13 Sept 2026, 17:37
75,489
-104
12 Sept 2026, 01:01
75,593
+43
9 Sept 2026, 17:59
75,550
-14
6 Sept 2026, 12:41
75,564
+108
4 Sept 2026, 04:00
75,456
-88
2 Sept 2026, 20:28
75,544
-66
1 Sept 2026, 20:58
75,610
+115
31 Aug 2026, 21:05
75,495
-98
30 Aug 2026, 17:37
75,593
+57
29 Aug 2026, 20:44
75,536
+83
28 Aug 2026, 20:42
75,453
-71
28 Aug 2026, 00:03
75,524
-63
27 Aug 2026, 02:15
75,587
-51
26 Aug 2026, 02:06
75,638
+175
25 Aug 2026, 02:16
75,463
-74
23 Aug 2026, 15:38
75,537
+50
22 Aug 2026, 03:47
75,487
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
51.3%
avg views ÷ 75,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
38,700
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
49 (4 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
929,300
Reactions total
28,318
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,890
Videos
≈661
Links
≈201
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 30s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48,381 reactions across 49 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
18,376
38.0%
❤
15,698
32.4%
👍
14,307
29.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katekatkova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я тут недавно зашла на Lamoda посмотреть одну вещь — и заодно решила проверить свой аккаунт. И, оказывается, там теперь новая система с уровнями 👀
Всего их три:
«Адепт стиля»
«Мастер стиля»
«Икона стиля» (есть, к чему стремиться, да?)
И уровень зависит не от каких-то накопленных баллов, а от того, насколько активно ты пользуешься Lamoda за последние 365 дней.
Я, конечно, сразу пошла смотреть, что у меня 😅
На кажд…
Уже несколько сезонов подряд я очень радуюсь показам Dolce&Gabbana. Они словно вернулись после неудачных экспериментов к самим себе. Все эти кружева, леопард, корсетные платья. Красота! SS27 однозначно «да». #обзор
Неожиданная коллаба!
Мистраль меня удивил, выпустив совместный фэшн-дроп с Rice 🔥 Ребята переодели даже упаковку с рисом с принтами из коллекции.
Айтемы: лонгслив, футболка, сумки-мешки, брелок-обвес и шапка-бини. Получились стильно. Если не заморачиваться со стилизацией, то легко можно носить с базовыми джинсами или широкими штанами и кроссовками. Вообще кастомный мерч в тренде, а концепт выглядит максимально свежо.…
#примеркатайм в одном из самых красивых магазинов Namelazz. Здесь можно всегда найти потрясающие платья, элегантные, модные костюмы, классные джинсы и пальто. На примерке хотелось все 🤭 тренч под крокодила - самая модная сейчас текстура, и он шикарен 🔥 сексуальные, женственные платья 😍 а какие брюки! У костюма просто невероятный жакет с акцентной талией и идеально сидячие брюки 👌 ну и пальто, конечно. Укороченное wow…
Рада поделиться новостью, что в LIMÉ стартовало специальное предложение: до -50% на выделенный ассортимент женской, мужской и детской линий бренда 😊
Среди моделей по сниженным ценам — много верхней одежды, хлопковые кардиганы и свитеры, джинсы и брюки, школьные и спортивные комплекты, нижнее белье и одежда для дома, обувь из замши и кожи и не только
Мои фавориты - на фото, но в ассортименте очень много всего классн…
На прошлой неделе посетила показ мужского бренда Henderson в Доме Пашкова. Очень красиво все было декорировано в фирменном синем цвете, даже коктейли 👌 красивые гости и крутой показ с великолепным стайлингом и идеально выбранными моделями. Весь показ ловила себя на мысли, что мы не хуже Dolce&Gabbana или Zegna. Итальянским духом была пропитана вся коллекция. И, представляете - в точку! В конце вечера объявили, что но…
Кажется, тот самый момент, когда утром выходишь из дома и думаешь: «А где все мои тёплые вещи?» уже совсем близко😅 Поэтому я решила не ждать первого настоящего холода и заранее собрать свой список к холодному сезону в Poizon (ДЭВУ).
Первое — пуховик. Хочется вещь, которую можно накинуть, когда температура резко упала, и при этом не жертвовать привычным стилем. В подборку я добавила сразу два варианта — под разное на…
FINAL SALE до 20 сентября
Только три дня — FINAL SALE с самыми приятными скидками на весенне-летнюю коллекцию SANCHY.
Самое время вернуться к моделям, которые давно были в ваших вишлистах. FINAL SALE продлится до 20 сентября включительно на сайте и в пространствах SANCHY на Петровском бульваре, 21 и в универмаге «Цветной».
Обращаем ваше внимание: в период FINAL SALE обработка заказов и ответы клиентского сервиса м…
Ну а я спешу к вам со свежим #обзор и #примеркатайм из магазина Luisa Wang. Бренд я нежно люблю за шикарную костюмную группу, великолепные брюки и кожаные вещи, а еще соотношение качество/цена. Вообще, берите на замеику, что главная идея бренда Luisa Wang — не ультратрендовость, а современная женственная база и сочетание современной элегантности, внимания к деталям и утончённой простоты. Бренд делает ставку на вещи…
❤295👍276🔥256
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @katekatkova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Incognitio Scientia Скрытое знание (без теории заговоров) @ilincognitio · 29,404 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kate.katkova” (@katekatkova), 75,495 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katekatkova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.