Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anastasia_Parfenova

Channel

Anastasia_Parfenova

@anastasia_parfenova_stylist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,111subscribers

-343 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748611406
TypeChannel
Username@anastasia_parfenova_stylist
Description#4JMH5 Канал стилиста Анастасии Парфеновой УВЕДОМЛЕНИЕ № 051058 о включении в перечень персональных страниц, объем аудитории каждой из которых составляет более десяти тысяч пользователей социальной сети https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a9256f5128e64b1f864e52
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anastasia_parfenova_stylist

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,10631,45431,2807 August 2026 — 31,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,446 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,443 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,427 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,422 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,413 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,409 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,394 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,387 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,372 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,349 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,339 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,326 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,311 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,304 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,285 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,263 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,248 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,244 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,227 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,218 subscribers29 August 2026 — 31,206 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,200 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,192 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,153 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,147 subscribers7 September 2026 — 31,135 subscribers10 September 2026 — 31,121 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,107 subscribers14 September 2026 — 31,106 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,113 subscribers27 September 2026 — 31,111 subscribers31,1117 August 202627 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net -343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,054–31,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 07:1531,111-2
17 Sept 2026, 16:0031,113+7
14 Sept 2026, 03:5731,106-1
12 Sept 2026, 11:3831,107-14
10 Sept 2026, 09:0231,121-14
7 Sept 2026, 05:2031,135-12
4 Sept 2026, 08:5831,147-6
2 Sept 2026, 18:2731,153-10
1 Sept 2026, 17:2631,163-29
31 Aug 2026, 16:4631,192-8
30 Aug 2026, 19:2931,200-6
29 Aug 2026, 17:2831,206-12
28 Aug 2026, 17:3431,218-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:5431,227-17
26 Aug 2026, 17:2231,244-4
25 Aug 2026, 17:5231,248-15
24 Aug 2026, 15:3531,263-22
22 Aug 2026, 22:3431,285-19
21 Aug 2026, 15:4431,304-7
20 Aug 2026, 17:0631,311first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 31,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,280
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held38 (27 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total68,630
Reactions total2,555
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 22:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,800
Videos
≈2,580
Links
≈266

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 26s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,675 reactions across 38 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,41750.7%
🔥3,39931.8%
😢4374.09%
😍4143.88%
💔2152.01%
🙏2001.87%
😁1831.71%
👍1731.62%
🥰1010.946%
❤‍🔥440.412%
🤩360.337%
🤣270.253%
💯90.084%
🤔60.056%
👏30.028%
💘30.028%
😘30.028%
🤗30.028%
🍾20.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,675 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 38 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anastasia_parfenova_stylist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC≈4,080 views160 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Вчера была на открытии культурного сезона в Особняке Мясникова Закрытый показ премьеры спектакля «Спектакль отменяется» Премьера спектакля для публики состоится завтра, 27 сентября Будет интересен людям с богатым театральным бэкграундом. Глубокий и довольно сложный для понимания. Обязательно перед просмотром читать описание Подробности о спектакле можно почитать здесь Мой лучок: • Тренч Zara (весна’26, арт: 5063…

🔥108❤33😍16👍2🥰1

25 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC≈5,210 views147 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, вчера в Lime началась межсезонная распродажа! Знаю, как все всегда этого ждут, поэтому пишу 😃 Я накануне 6 часов снимала там отборку для чата. Гарантирую, что хорошие вещи найти можно и немало! Рекомендую ехать именно в Галерею, так как этот магазин после летней реконструкции самый большой и в нем самый хороший выбор (я прошла несколько) И стало очень удобно, что все женское теперь на одном этаже, а на др…

❤100🔥39😍7😁1

21 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC≈8,130 views186 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

У чатика есть один недостаток 😈 Там можно продавать друг другу вещи прошлых лет. И периодически кто-то выкладывает что-то на продажу и прикрепляет мои старые фото и видео двухлетней давности 🙈 И каждый раз при виде них у меня дергается глаз 😅 От того, как я там пипец хреново, простихоспади, выгляжу и ничего с этим не делаю! Это было еще до идеи создания Бьюти-чатика и до того, как я узнала, чем ботокс отличается от …

❤132🔥46😍7👍1

21 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC≈4,890 views71 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥35❤22👍7😍7

18 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈5,220 views125 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Кто еще хотел подписаться на ОСЕННИЙ ЧАТИК, остались последние 2 дня! Не опаздываем! А то потом начнется, я вас знаю! У меня этот чатик прямо урожайный 🍎 Еще не было ни одного обзора, из которого бы я ни купила себе хотя бы одну вещь 😃 Ну потому что не было у меня ни штанов обтягивающих, ни пиджаков приталенных, ни крокодила, ни зебры, ни рубашки, прости хоспади, приталенной. А оно все вдруг как нагрянуло тренды 😅…

❤89🔥26😍8👍2

18 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈3,320 views65 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤41🔥16😍8

15 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC≈5,660 views162 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Мой любимый формат: притащить домой десять пар актуальной обуви и целый день собирать с ней лучки 😃 ⠀ Итак, что модно и носибельно в этом сезоне: 🤩Туфли с призакрытым мысом. Обожаю! Невероятно окутывают ногу, поэтому в них она кажется миниатюрней. (37 размер) ⠀ Животные. Любые! Змея, леопард, зебра, олень, крокодил, тигр. В эту отборку для разнообразия решила включить тигра 🐅 ⠀ 🤩У ботильонов самой трендово-базовой ф…

❤103🔥51😍8

15 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC≈4,790 views101 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤60🔥34😍7

6 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,540 views215 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

И сразу следом пара лучков последних дней. Как-то резко в этот раз осень, лодочки пока отложены для сменки 😅

❤167🔥30🥰13😍5

6 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,650 views171 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Всем воскресный привет 😃 Делюсь новостями за эту неделю👇🏻 Состоялся рабочий тест драйв руки. Показал, что она в целом норм, использовать можно, но есть сложности: почти от всех движений болит, особенно поворотных 🤔 Видимо, там какой-то вывих, пойду еще к врачу разбираться. Но чатик все равно пока готовлю! (Пока мне не сказали, что рукой снова нельзя двигать, так как вывих 😂) Девчонки из чата прислали смешной мем «…

❤128🔥32😁6😍4🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈7,120 views549 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Резюмируем наиболее смешные версии из обеих соцсетей 😃 • Это была новая коллекция гипсов от Армани (😹😹) • Отрастили новую руку потому что невозможно работать одной (💯😂) • Травмотолог женщина и тоже хочет в осенний чатик! (😝) А если серьезно, считаю это историю достойной подробного рассказа 😃 В прошлую субботу, на следующий день после прилета из отпуска, я сильно упала с велосипеда на руку (вся нагрузка пришлась на…

❤353🔥137👍34💔8😁7😍7👏3

31 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC≈6,350 views368 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Галя, у нас отмена😃🤪😂 Есть версии?

🔥270😁64❤32🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @anastasia_parfenova_stylist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 354,527
#1
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390
#2
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 95,102
#3
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 188,094
#4
STEPRITA
@leopardhunt · 37,972
#5
Модная скряга
@fashionscrooge · 21,990
#6
Lavrova Pro Style
@lavrovaprostyle · 26,879
#7
Azalia L/ stylist
@azalial · 42,584
#8
LIMÉ
@limestorecom · 93,482
#9
Канал о стиле Тани Компаненко
@kompanenkotanya · 57,293
#10
Стилист для простых смертных
@vavdeyukekaterina · 33,114
#11
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 189,279
#12
Мода быть собой
@welcometoyourselfff · 33,543
#13
Ilona Kril
@ilonakril · 11,635
#14
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 576,732
#15
the girl who
@girl_who · 80,018
#16
stylist.irina_
@stylist_irina13 · 45,957
#17
MUR
@fashion_mur · 208,487
#18
Стильный стилист стилизует
@leushinastylist · 47,193
#19
Elena Markushina
@elenamarkushina · 8,804
#20
Ой, шика дам!
@oh_shika_dam · 1,489
#21
GLAMORAMA
@glamoramablog · 28,837
#22
АЛЕКСА ЕВДОКИМОВА
@alexastylist · 37,159
#23
Ко-Ко-Ко (фэшн / стиль / мода)
@kokokokakmodno · 41,056
#24
Виктория Соловьёва | стилист
@victoria_solovyeva8 · 21,136
#25
Дневники Кэрри
@rita_maslova · 4,885
#26
Стилист Katia Kida | Катя Кида
@stylistkatiakida · 23,805
#27
Мужской стилист | Александр Клейменов
@kleymenovstyle · 4,424
#28
zhuk___lena/Стилист
@zhuklenatmn · 5,599
#29
Алеся Петровна
@alesiapetrovna · 140,033
#30
Стилист•Оля Малышева
@stylistPROtrends · 13,441
#31
Птичка не дремлет
@bird_doesnt_doze · 24,103
#32
Inside out with Irma
@irmadaily · 26,502
#33
🅅🄸🅃🄰 🄿🄸🅂🄷🄴🅃
@VITA_PISHET · 23,864
#34
Дворцы_Колодцы
@zaytrip · 665
#35
Jane Boytsova
@janeboytsova · 9,061
#36
Modnaya Kontora
@modnayakontora · 7,196
#37
Daisyknit.ru
@daisyknit · 31,240
#38
Дом Моды
@fashioninn · 24,732
#39
Эстетический маньяк
@elizabethbelaya · 20,723
#40
Валентина Паевская
@valentinapaevskaya · 230,771
#41
YesDressNoStress | Стася Кульбацкая
@yesdressnostress · 48,507
#42
МОДА И ВПЕЧАТЛЕНИЕ
@fashionandimpression · 5,332
#43
Д Р Е С С - К О Д (ex. Dressed to Kill)
@dressedto · 41,575
#44
aim_clo
@aimclo_telegram · 37,819
#45
Катькало
@Juliacatcalo · 24,217
#46
Стильный Сырник
@mariemets · 23,308
#47

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mihi Style
@mihi_style_channel · 35,911
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 2 September 2026
АЛЕКСА ЕВДОКИМОВА
@alexastylist · 37,159
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
Стилист Katia Kida | Катя Кида
@stylistkatiakida · 23,805
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 September 2026
СТИЛИСТ JENNYHAET
@jennyhaet · 46,937
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
Виктория Соловьёва | стилист
@victoria_solovyeva8 · 21,136
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
stylist.irina_
@stylist_irina13 · 45,957
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
Стилист для простых смертных
@vavdeyukekaterina · 33,114
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
Lavrova Pro Style
@lavrovaprostyle · 26,879
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
prosto_o_vkusno2
@prosto_o_vkusno · 37,114
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anastasia_Parfenova” (@anastasia_parfenova_stylist), 31,111 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anastasia_parfenova_stylist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.