Channel
@rusipoteka
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,055subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001317988928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rusipoteka |
| Description | Ипотека в России - новости и аналитика. Банки и кредиты. Недвижимость и строительство. Аналитика и комментарии. @KosmoZon - сотрудничество #ипотека #недвижимость #новости #банки #финансы #кредитование Регистрация в РКН https://clck.ru/3J6Xpo |
| Created | 3 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rusipoteka |
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @rusipoteka/23088 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC | @cotlovan_contrust/311375 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC | 1.00 | 2.1 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cotlovan_contrust | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.1 hours | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 35 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @rusipoteka — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 35,055 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 35,067 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 35,084 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 35,093 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 35,103 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 35,106 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 35,094 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:50 | 35,096 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 35,096 | first reading |
73 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 77,149 |
| Reactions total | 265 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
203 reactions across 56 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 135 | 66.5% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 23.2% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 5.42% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 4.93% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqviKTb8 | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🏡Дорогие подписчики, собрали для вас ТОП каналов этой недели.✅ ❇️ Здесь реальные советы для тех, кто планирует покупку недвижимости и не хочет потерять деньги при ее покупке либо нарваться на мошенников – Безопасная покупка недвижимости / Поташникова Анжела «Безопасная сделка» канал юриста по недвижимости Олеси Бухтояровой вскрывает схемы потери квартир прямо сейчас. Разбор свежих законов, судов и реальных ошибок б…
👍1
❗️ Кредитная история (КИ) перестает быть достоянием банков. Интерес к ней все чаще проявляют и другие организации, например: ▪️работодатели, ▪️страховые компании, ▪️сервисы каршеринга, ▪️другие организации, которым нужно оценить финансовые риски. В одном из кредитных бюро отметили, что интерес со стороны рынка от различных компаний есть, но заключить соглашение с БКИ отваживаются пока немногие. Все пользователи КИ …
👍2
💳 ПСБ снижает ставки по рыночной ипотеке С 12 августа Вторичный рынок Заемщики по найму: 🟠ставка от 17,45% 🟠ПВ 20,01–80% ИП и собственники бизнеса: 🟠ставка от 18,15% 🟠ПВ 40,01–80% Новостройка Заемщики по найму: 🟠ставка от 17,55% 🟠ПВ 20,01–80% ИП и собственники бизнеса: 🟠ставка от 18,05% 🟠ПВ 40,01–80% Готовый дом и ИЖС Заемщики по найму: 🟠ставка от 18,70% 🟠ПВ 30,01–80% ИП и собственники бизнеса: 🟠ставка от 1…
👍2❤1
⚡️ Почти каждая вторая россиянка (43%) испытывает неуверенность при самостоятельной покупке недвижимости и предпочитает, чтобы переговоры с риэлторами, банками и застройщиками вел мужчина, показал опрос ГК «Гранель». Лишь 13% участниц опроса уверены, что могут полностью самостоятельно вести переговоры. Наибольшие сложности у женщин вызывают юридические вопросы. ⚫️28% женщин признались, что больше всего боятся не з…
👍2❤1
❗️ Аналитики Домклик и Центра Финансовой Аналитики рассказали об изменениях цен на новостройки и вторичку в июле 2026 года. «Темп роста цен на первичную недвижимость остался в июле на низком уровне (0,6%), тогда как на готовую цены третий месяц подряд растут на 1%. Цена "квадрата" в новостройках увеличилась до 191,4 тыс. руб., в готовом жилье – до 128,4 тыс. руб. Годовой рост составил 9,1% и 10,4% соответственно. Го…
👍2
🛑ТОП-25 банков по доле отказов ипотечных заявок, поданных в июле клиентами АН Этажи. 🛑Также показан прирост данного показателя по сравнению с июнем. #Этажи #ОтказыБанков @rusipoteka
👍2❤1
🛑ТОП-25 банков по предпочтению клиентов АН Этажи при подаче ипотечных заявок в июле. 🛑Также показан прирост данного показателя по сравнению с июнем. #Этажи #ПредпочтенияКлиентов @rusipoteka
👍2
🛑 ТОП-25 банков, в которые подавали ипотечные заявки клиенты АН Этажи в июле. 🛑Также представлена динамика по сравнению с показателями июня. #Этажи #ВыдачаИпотеки @rusipoteka
👍2
💬 Илья Колунов, гендиректор ГК «Садовое кольцо»: ▪️В этом году рынку предстоит научиться жить без прежней семейной ипотеки. Скорее всего, в этом году ее условия будут ужесточены. Точные параметры еще неизвестны, но уже понятно, что этот финансовый инструмент станет сугубо адресным и перестанет быть основным драйвером продаж в новостройках. ▪️Пик покупательского ажиотажа пришелся на конец прошлого–начало этого года.…
👍2
💬 Максим Репин, эксперт-аналитик Российской гильдии риэлторов (РГР): ▪️Мы находимся в фазе скрытого «пузыря». В классическом понимании «пузырь» надувается, когда люди сходят с ума от роста цен и покупают активы на пике. У нас же ситуация обратная – цены высоки, а покупать некому. ▪️«Пузырь» держится не на ажиотаже граждан, а на огромных кредитах застройщиков, которые они уже не могут вернуть. Это не перегретый рыно…
👍4❤1
⚡️ Ирек Файзуллин, министр строительства и ЖКХ РФ: «Хочется пожелать всем успешно работать для того, чтобы была возможность брать ипотечные кредиты». источник: Юнашев LIVE #Файзуллин #минстрой @rusipoteka 📲 Русипотека в MAX
👏2❤1👍1
❗️ В Тульской области стартовала льготная программа «Ипотека для семейного счастья». Об этом сообщил губернатор Дмитрий Миляев. Программу запустил «Региональный фонд развития жилищного строительства и ипотечного кредитования» в рамках нацпроекта «Инфраструктура для жизни». Программа призвана поддержать отдельные категории жителей региона: ▪️сотрудников оборонных предприятий ▪️врачей ▪️учителей ▪️молодых ученых Дл…
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @rusipoteka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 7,249 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 66 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ипотека в России. Новости и аналитика” (@rusipoteka), 35,055 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusipoteka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.