8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,070–14,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 07:22
14,123
-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:52
14,124
+10
10 Aug 2026, 04:48
14,114
+2
9 Aug 2026, 05:52
14,112
+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:37
14,111
+8
7 Aug 2026, 05:01
14,103
+26
6 Aug 2026, 02:22
14,077
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:37
14,077
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.79%
avg views ÷ 14,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
817
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
49 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
40,035
Reactions total
793
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,840
Videos
≈575
Links
≈3,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
29s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
580 reactions across 36 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
179
30.9%
🔥
176
30.3%
👀
70
12.1%
❤
33
5.69%
🤔
32
5.52%
💯
27
4.66%
🤗
14
2.41%
😁
13
2.24%
😎
10
1.72%
👏
7
1.21%
🤯
7
1.21%
👌
4
0.69%
⚡
3
0.517%
🍾
3
0.517%
✍
2
0.345%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 793reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📝Я получил крутейший отзыв на свою обучающую программу «Еxcel для недвижимости». Хочу поделиться здесь:
⏪ Как же здорово, что в наше время есть возможность перенимать передовые наработки у лучших профессионалов в своей области! На курсе Артёма Цогоева «Еxcel для недвижимости» я получила невероятное удовольствие от процесса обучения и результата, который не заставил себя ждать.
Если до курса все мои прогнозы были по…
«Зачем покупать коммерческую недвижимость, если облигации или депозиты приносят такую же доходность?»
☝️ Это очень популярный и до слёз знакомый вопрос, на который на этом канале не единожды давался ответ в разных формах. У коммерческой недвижимости есть ряд принципиальных отличий от облигаций и депозитов.
📈иВ отличии от инструментов фиксированной доходности, арендная плата коммерческой недвижимости растёт с течени…
❌Нет! Я не решил переквалифицироваться из специалистов по недвижимости в фермеры. И эти вопросы были нужны мне для параллели.
☝️Просто почему-то в последнее время в л.с. ко мне приходят люди и спрашивают... Например, что я думаю про инвестиции в новостройки, есть там ещё инвест? Или инвестиции в ГАБ в 2026 году, это хорошая идея?
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
💬 Я считаю, что отвечать незнакомому человеку на такие вопросы нужно только пос…
🐮 Эксперты по животноводству есть у меня в канале? Очень нужно ваше мнение!
Есть два вопроса:
1️⃣ Я хочу купить корову, чтобы она давала молоко, которое я буду продавать. Вопрос: это хороший бизнес?
2️⃣ Я хочу занедорого купить поросенка, вырастить его во взрослого хряка, а потом продать сильно дороже,чем купил. Вопрос: имеет это смысл с точки зрения заработка?
🤝 Заранее спасибо за ответы настоящих экспертов! Доб…
🏢 В Москве сейчас есть такой парадокс: офисные объекты класса А и В+ возводятся там, где офисы не нужны в принципе - промзоны, дальние окраины и прочие неудобья. На основании этого факта некоторые делают далеко идущие выводы о том, что рынок офисов ждет обвал. При этом Москва как локация разбирается как единое целое - будто бы спрос на офисы в Метрогородке и спрос в Белорусском деловом районе это одно и то же, и пер…
📊 Коллеги из NF Group обновили «индекс миллиона» - показатель того, сколько м2 элитного жилья в Москве можно получить в обмен на ₽100 млн. По итогам I полугодия 2026 года это 44 м2 - против 46 м2 год назад, то есть минус 4% за год.
💵 Средневзвешенная цена предложения на первичном рынке элитного жилья по данным NF Group выросла на 6% за год и подошла к ₽2 300 тыс./м2. Сокращение доступной за ₽100 млн площади зафиксир…
❓ Вопрос: можно ли передать апартаменты в доверительное управление, будучи физлицом, и таким образом обойтись без регистрации ИП? Вопрос поступил через комментарии к этому посту.
Спойлер: можно, а зачем?
⚖️ Гражданский кодекс не против. Учредителем управления выступает собственник, и физлицу здесь всё позволено (ст. 1014). Управляющим может быть только ИП или коммерческая организация - ООО, АО (ст. 1015).
💥 Дальше…
💜Вышел новый отчет SimpleEstate о рынке стрит-ритейла Москве по итогам 2-го квартале 2026 года.
📉Во втором квартале продолжилась коррекция цен на готовый арендный бизнес: цены на помещения с супермаркетами снизились на 2% за квартал, а на ГАБ площадью от 300 м² — на 3%. При этом качественные объекты по-прежнему остаются в дефиците: значительную часть предложения составляют проблемные или неликвидные помещения по зав…
Четыре года рынка стрит-ритейла Москвы в цифрах
✍️ В 2022 году инвестиционная платформа SimpleEstate начала выпускать ежеквартальную аналитику по рынку стрит-ритейла Москвы. Я решил посмотреть на эти 4 года через призму выпущенных отчетов.
📊 Средняя стоимость квадратного метра ГАБ с супермаркетами в Москве выросла на 42% с середины 2022 года, а торговые помещения без арендаторов подорожали за тот же период на 35%. …
✈️ SMLT выпустили новость о том, что фонд «Горизонт» наследников основателя «Самолёта» М. Кенина продолжил распродажу акций подмосковного монстра и отчудил 18% акций в пользу фонда Fonte Inceptia Alpha Fund OEIC Limited под управлением казахстанской Fonte Capital примерно за ₽4,2 млрд.
☝️Возможная инвестиционная идея этой покупки - на фото выше (скрин с сайта фонда). Впрочем я лично думаю, что это какая-то непростая…
🤔6👀4🔥2😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @atsogoev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть несколько валютных активов в разных странах18%
Широкая валютная диверсификация, прям как в учебнике!10%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 35,702 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артем Цогоев | Недвижимость” (@atsogoev), 14,123 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atsogoev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.