48-Й СЪЕЗД ФЕДЕРАЦИИ ИЖС В МОСКВЕ Встречаемся в банке ДОМ.РФ. В программе — важные темы для развития строительного бизнеса и возможность напрямую пообщаться с представителями банка. Что обсудим? 🔹 Продвижение в социальных сетях без штрафов и блокировок Дарина Лисецкая — юрист по рекламе, CEO LEGAL DIGITAL — расскажет, как законно продвигать свои услуги в интернете. 🔹 Открытый разговор с банком ДОМ.РФ Обсудим фи…

Channel
Федерация ИЖС
@federation_igs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,189subscribers
+219 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001531757989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @federation_igs |
| Description | Всё, что важно знать застройщику Вступить в Федерацию ИЖС: https://federationigs.ru/?utm_source=telegram Чат: https://paywall.pw/chat_igs Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/federation_igs |
Topic
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:39 | 14,189 | +28 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:38 | 14,161 | +9 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 14,152 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 14,153 | +5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:18 | 14,148 | +14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 14,134 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:26 | 14,132 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:14 | 14,133 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 14,135 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 14,139 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 14,140 | +4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 14,136 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 14,139 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 14,140 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 14,137 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 14,131 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 14,124 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:36 | 14,126 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 14,128 | +7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 14,121 | first reading |
Engagement
168 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.66%
- avg views ÷ 14,189 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,370
- 63 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.602%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 63
- of 168 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 61 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 168 (4 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 86,359 |
| Reactions total | 512 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 20:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,150
- Videos
- ≈1,340
- Links
- ≈2,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 37m 13s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,528 reactions across 164 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 624 | 40.8% | |
| 😁 | 271 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 213 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 162 | 10.6% | |
| 👏 | 50 | 3.27% | |
| 🦄 | 34 | 2.23% | |
| 🎉 | 31 | 2.03% | |
| 🙏 | 31 | 2.03% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 1.51% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 0.785% | |
| 🆒 | 11 | 0.72% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 0.72% | |
| ☃ | 9 | 0.589% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.524% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.458% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 0.393% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.262% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 0.262% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.196% | |
| 4 further kinds | 7 | 0.458% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,528 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 44
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 14
- of 168 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 8
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @federation_igs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 168 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 63 posts held from the last 30 days (12.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В Сбербанке ожидают, что ключевая ставка ЦБ опустится ниже 10% в 2028 году Мы ожидаем замедления инфляции в 2027 году с ее стабилизацией вблизи целевых значений регулятора в 2028–2029 годах (~4%). Такой прогноз позволит ЦБ снизить ключевую ставку ниже 10% уже в 2028 году
👍2
ЦБ хочет распространить эскроу на весь ИЖС. Банк России надеется на ускоренное принятие законопроекта, распространяющего механизм эскроу-счетов на всю ипотеку на ИЖС с подрядом, заявила глава ЦБ Эльвира Набиуллина. Готовится законопроект, который и Минфин поддерживает, и Минэкономразвития. Мы надеемся, что он будет принят ускоренно Сейчас механизм эскроу-счетов при строительстве частных домов (ИЖС) с подрядом обяз…
❤2😎1
Пока закон НЕ принят. 9 ноября в Госдуму только внесли законопроект № 29761‑9. Действующие правила эта новость пока не меняет. Что предлагают? Прямо разрешить направлять маткапитал на строительство и реконструкцию жилого дома на приусадебных участках ЛПХ в границах населённого пункта, где строительство жилья допускается. Полевых участков и земель, на которых нельзя строить жилой дом, поправки не касаются. Когда за…
❤4🔥2
64-й съезд Федерации ИЖС в Казани — как это было! 📷 Начали с бизнес-завтрака с Кристиной Яковенко, сооснователем и продуктологом девелоперской группы и концепт-бюро «Хрустальный». Обсудили перспективные схемы реализации посёлков, 186-ФЗ и 214-ФЗ, лэнд-девелопмент, КРТ и выбор продукта, который будет востребован на рынке в 2027–2028 годах. Затем отправились на экскурсию по посёлку «Европа» — проекту бизнес- и премиу…
❤2
Posted without readable text
😁4👍2
Всероссийский форум ИЖС в Казани: как это было? 🎊 Вчера в рамках Строительной недели БРИКС мы провели Всероссийский форум в «Казань Экспо». На одной площадке собрались представители банков, девелоперских и строительных компаний, эксперты и профессионалы отрасли. Обсудили будущее ИЖС, финансирование и законодательство, цифровизацию, нейросети, продажи, развитие бизнеса и новые подходы к строительству. День получил…
👍5❤2🔥2😁2
Коттеджные посёлки получат отдельное регулирование: законопроект № 155842-8 прошёл второе чтение 10 ноября 2026 года Госдума приняла во втором чтении законопроект № 155842-8, который устанавливает правила управления общим имуществом в жилых комплексах с индивидуальными жилыми домами. Документ впервые закрепляет на законодательном уровне понятие жилого комплекса применительно к ИЖС и регулирует отношения собственник…
❤7
Александр Дубовенко при этом обнаружил стагфляцию в ИЖС Это особая экономическая ситуация, при которой цены растут, а объем рынка сокращается. В каком-то смысле это противоречит экономическим законам. По идее, если покупателей меньше, продавцы должны снижать цены. Но снижение и повышение цен работает тогда, когда спрос эластичен. А в ИЖС сейчас происходят глобальные, структурные изменения. Вроде как компаний много…
❤2
Эльвира Набиуллина: гражданам нужна не доступная ипотека, а доступное жилье Объем кредитов по льготным ставкам приблизился к 19 трлн рублей, на ипотеку приходится основная часть этой суммы, сообщила глава Центробанка на пленарном заседании Госдумы. По словам Набиуллиной, вся выгода от льготной ипотеки была «съедена» ростом цен. Путь к доступной рыночной ипотеке лежит через низкую инфляцию. А льготная ипотека должн…
❤6💯1🙏1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4🏆3❤🔥2😁1
А теперь покажем вам небольшой фрагмент одного из самых ярких моментов церемонии BRICS PROPERTY AWARDS — объявления победителя в номинации «Лучший коттеджный посёлок»! 🏆
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @federation_igs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@federation_igs edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @federation_igs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 2 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 33 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Изменения 186ФЗ
- Да, нужные поправки10%
- Ничего особо не меняется17%
- Дайте привыкнуть к старым20%
- Хватит мучать строителей57%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Занимаетесь ли вы чистовой отделкой?
- Да занимаюсь, все супер18%
- Занимаюсь, но это кошмар16%
- Думаю над этим9%
- Никогда в жизни27%
- В эскроу беру только теплый контур, без чистовой37%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вкл какого банка вы сейчас используете?
- ДомРФ63%
- Сбер21%
- Втб16%
- Другой14%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы готовы принять оплату за дом или подряд цифровыми рублями?
- Да готов15%
- Возможно готов, когда разберусь что это47%
- Ни в коем случае39%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой мессенджер вы выберете для замены Телеграм?
- Max64%
- Wb38%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Новый закон от 4 августа о зонах подтопления
- У меня есть положительное уведомление полученное до 4 августа54%
- У меня нет уведомления, планировал регистрировать дом по дачной амнистии49%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@doma_russia · 2,2033 postsВаш дом и технологии / VDT Project 🍀
@eco_tech_house · 1542 postsPRO-инвестор Наталия Алексеева
@Alexnat_izh · 1821 postИРИНА. Земельное инвестирование.
@Irina_zinvest · 531 postСтроительство домов Севастополь | Александр КАЙ
@KadiAlek · 3511 postООО "Сав-Сан" ТД ЗСК КЕТРА
@TDketra · 2581 postДиана | ДОМ МЕЧТЫ IZIMODUL
@dianamodul · 1041 postФедерация ИЖС Северо-Запад
@federationijs_spb · 931 postАлина Баюрова: ипотечный брокер
@ipotekaABbroker · 6311 postИпотека Новосибирск
@ipoteka_marinansk · 2901 postАрхитектор Липатников
@lipatnikov_architect · 2881 postО малоэтажном строительстве
@penates · 4461 postРАВНОВЕСИЕ | СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО | ДОМА ХАЙ-ТЕК | СТАВРОПОЛЬ
@ravnovesie26 · 4611 postТВОЙ элемент ДЛЯ АГЕНТОВ
@tvojelement · 1211 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@izhs_channel · 32,9053 postsДвиж Казань: Мероприятия События Ивенты
@kazandvizh · 8,4253 postsЗарабатываем на "ИЖС" и земельных участках вместе.
@akademXD · 9071 postКазаньДА | Новости Казани
@kazan · 286,3821 postКазань на максималках
@kazancity · 402,9831 postВокруг Казани | Куда пойти
@kazanlenta · 38,0271 post#СобериЗабор
@soberizabor · 3821 postСтрой65, строительная компания
@stroy_65 · 3001 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@clubofbuilders · 21,087
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
@weartrack · 25,697
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
@maloetazhnaya · 29,756
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@izhs_channel · 32,905
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
@RussiaBuild · 108,768
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@sergei_petrusha · 25,045
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
@domrf_life · 33,174
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
@sprosidomrf · 32,860
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
@domgazobeton · 22,451
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
@ipoteka_kabanovi · 24,119
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
@antipinantipin · 36,001
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
@domclick_pro · 87,755
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@zemles · 43,898
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@gektar_zemli_spb · 26,546
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
@forumhouseru · 51,090
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@prodoma_tg · 18,673
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
@ipotekahouse · 72,025
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@rusipoteka · 34,890
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
@zaboris · 67,734
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@invest_doma_s_0 · 20,362
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
@cian_official · 21,047
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
@zemelniyvopros · 40,452
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
@zemelnoe_pravo · 25,079
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
@antonmorozru · 45,771
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Федерация ИЖС” (@federation_igs), 14,189 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/federation_igs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.