2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 360–362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 21:02
361
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:03
361
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
75
Links
24
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 2 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5195033767969839232
4
16.7%
custom 5445355530111437729
4
16.7%
custom 5429651785352501917
3
12.5%
custom 5445221832074483553
3
12.5%
custom 5267500801240092311
2
8.33%
custom 5294167145079395967
2
8.33%
custom 5310278924616356636
2
8.33%
custom 5197503331215361533
1
4.17%
custom 5201691993775818138
1
4.17%
custom 5264713049637409446
1
4.17%
custom 5267102644886853973
1
4.17%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📈 Вывели подборки на новый уровень!
Мы первые начали внедрять в подборки то, чего раньше в этом формате почти не было.
🗣️ Что изменили:
• начали разрабатывать отдельные шаблоны под разные категории
• добавили более продуманную визуальную подачу
• начали работать со структурой внутри подборки
• добавили крутящиеся премиум-элементы для участников
• сделали каждый канал частью общего визуального оформления
• начали в…
🏆 Команда GreenSMM уже провела более 10 тематических подборок в MAX.
Всего за 7 дней работы 🤝 нам удалось наладить коммуникацию с администраторами топовых Telegram-каналов. Среди них — «Акула Бизнеса» и «Пакет с пакетами».
Мы рады, что администраторы доверяют нам помощь в привлечении аудитории в их MAX-каналы и развитии их медиа-проектов.
👨💻 В настоящий момент команда активно работает над структурированием тема…
⚖️ Что важнее в посте — текст или визуал?
👀 Визуал — это фильтр внимания.
Он отвечает за «стоп-скролл»: заметят пост или пролистают дальше.
✏️ Текст — это инструмент результата.
Он объясняет ценность и ведёт к действию.
Типичная ошибка — делать ставку только на внешний вид ❌
Пост аккуратный, стильный, но внутри — общие фразы и ноль логики.
Выглядит хорошо, не работает никак.
💯 Рабочая связка всегда одна:
визу…
📈 Как развить Telegram-канал?
Разобрали методы и их преимущества в карусели 👆
✨ А если вам нужна помощь в настройке любого метода, то обращайтесь к нам
Наш сайт 👉🏻 GreenSmm
📲 Наш канал в MAX
По всем вопросам : @Dmitrey_GreenSmm
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @GreenSmm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,920 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Агентство.GreenSmm” (@GreenSmm), 361 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GreenSmm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
