Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Positive Hack Days Media

Channel

Positive Hack Days Media

@positivehackmedia

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,043subscribers

-1,403 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045163554
TypeChannel
Usernames@phdays @positivehackmedia
DescriptionЗаявление в РКН № 6852471033 Канал международного киберфестиваля #PHDays для всех, кто хочет погрузиться в мир кибербеза и круто провести время. От @Positive_Technologies
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held126
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/positivehackmedia

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

30,04331,44630,744.56 August 202610 November 2026
126 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,403. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,833–31,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 126
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:2030,043-4
9 Nov 2026, 22:0930,047-17
8 Nov 2026, 16:4630,064no change
8 Nov 2026, 12:4930,064-18
7 Nov 2026, 10:4930,082-1
7 Nov 2026, 09:5530,083-31
6 Nov 2026, 10:1030,114no change
6 Nov 2026, 06:4630,114-10
5 Nov 2026, 11:5530,124-9
5 Nov 2026, 08:4530,133-14
4 Nov 2026, 10:0830,147no change
4 Nov 2026, 04:5930,147-5
3 Nov 2026, 08:0530,152no change
3 Nov 2026, 06:3630,152-16
2 Nov 2026, 09:3630,168+1
2 Nov 2026, 08:2930,167-8
1 Nov 2026, 09:0430,175no change
1 Nov 2026, 06:4030,175-9
31 Oct 2026, 11:0630,184no change
31 Oct 2026, 08:1730,184first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 30,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,710
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.821%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held37 (30 May 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total28,260
Reactions total232
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 23:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
331
Videos
146
Links
224

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 36s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,858 reactions across 36 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40721.9%
🔥33618.1%
🐳21711.7%
😁1126.03%
🌭1075.76%
👍1045.60%
🌚804.31%
🍓703.77%
🤣673.61%
😱603.23%
👏462.48%
🎃382.05%
😭291.56%
🤓231.24%
🤯170.915%
👌150.807%
💅120.646%
❤‍🔥110.592%
🙈110.592%
🤔110.592%
24 further kinds854.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,850 views30 reactionsread 10 November 2026

У реверс-инжиниринга есть свой звук 💽 Мы выпустили саундтрек к нашему научпоп-кино «Как получить доступ ко всему: реверс-инжиниринг» о 100-летней истории советского и российского реверса. Фильм уже посмотрели больше 1,2 млн человек, а теперь проникнуться его атмосферой можно, просто надев наушники. К созданию саундтрека мы подошли как реверс-инженеры 🤖 Чтобы понять, как устроена сложная система, нужно заглянуть вн…

🔥14🐳5👍5❤3😁3

6 Nov 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,730 views23 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤10🔥7🐳3👍3

5 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC≈3,830 views40 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡ Открыли прием заявок на доклады PHDays Fest 2027 Юбилейный, пятнадцатый киберфестиваль пройдет с 20 по 22 мая в «Лужниках». И выйти на его сцену может каждый, кому есть что рассказать о кибербезе и технологиях, которые нас окружают. Заявки принимаем до 24 февраля. 😎 Регалии не важны Как и всегда, нам неважно, сколько у вас лет опыта и какие должности вы занимаете. Главное — интересная тема: профи и новички пода…

🔥21❤9👍9🐳1

26 Oct 2026, 15:29 UTC≈3,410 views33 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

🛴 Почему фольга не поможет угнать шеринговый самокат. Отвечаем в новой серии роликов с Whoosh Продолжаем рассказывать, как устроены технологии вокруг нас. Вместе с Whoosh разбираемся, почему их самокат куда больше, чем два колеса и руль. Внутри у него свой «мозг» — IoT-модуль собственной разработки. Начинаем с основ. В первом выпуске за 2 минуты Анастасия Гайнетдинова из Whoosh объясняет, как самокат живет сразу в …

❤12🐳9🔥7👍2🤯2😁1

16 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC≈13,400 views88 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

PHDays Fest 2027 🌟 Юбилейный киберфестиваль пройдет с 20 по 22 мая в «Лужниках». И мы сделаем его великолепным. В следующем году PHDays исполнится 15 лет. За это время изменился сам фестиваль, изменились технологии и то, насколько сильно они вошли в нашу жизнь. Но одно осталось прежним: интерес к людям, которые хотят понять, как все устроено, и попробовать сделать по-своему. Именно эта идея легла в основу концепц…

❤43🔥27👍14🤔2🐳1😁1

14 Oct 2026, 13:14 UTC≈4,040 views18 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @molpredmscPhoto

🔐 Как получить доступ ко всему? Приглашаем разобраться в реверс-инжиниринге Что скрывается внутри привычных программ и устройств? Как понять, по каким принципам они работают, найти слабые места и разобраться в устройстве сложных систем? 👀 🔥🔥🔥16 октября Positive Technologies приглашает на бесплатный мастер-класс по реверс-инжинирингу — методу, который применяется в исследованиях безопасности программного обеспечения…

🔥8👍6🐳4

9 Oct 2026, 16:08 UTC≈3,730 views30 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @Positive_TechnologiesPhoto

Что за уязвимость в Telegram, про которую все говорят В Telegram Desktop обнаружили уязвимость CVE-2026-107181, которая затрагивает версии приложения до 7.2.9. Она может позволить злоумышленникам похитить файлы с устройства пользователя, если тот перейдет по специально сформированной ссылке. Во всем мире потенциально уязвимы от 100 до 200 млн устройств. Чем это опасно и как защититься, рассказывает Егор Подмоков, …

👍14🤯8🐳3🤔3🔥2

1 Oct 2026, 11:18 UTC≈4,370 views62 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Инженеры Google создали движущуюся клавиатуру, чтобы… …да мы и сами до конца не поняли зачем 🤨 Выглядит она как беговая дорожка для пальцев. Клавиши расположены на четырех вертикальных конвейерных лентах и сами приезжают к пальцам. На самом деле это ежегодная традиция японского подразделения Google — 1 октября инженеры представляют какую-нибудь странную клавиатуру. Раньше, например, они уже делали ее в виде диска …

🌭26🐳17❤10😁8😈1

17 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈5,100 views48 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Еще один бунт робота На этот раз в Китае. Человекоподобный выбил пульт из рук разработчика, которым тот управлял. Но в конце маневра отдал честь поклоном в духе боевых искусств. Восстание. Но с уважением 🫡 Видео: Fox News @PositiveHackMedia

😁32❤8🐳5🌭2😈1

14 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈11,600 views32 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Как снять кино о сложной профессии Рассказываем об этом в нашем фильме о фильме на YouTube, в RUTUBE и «VK Видео». Полгода прошло с тех пор, как позитивное научпоп-кино «Как получить доступ ко всему: реверс-инжиниринг» отправилось в свободное плавание. За это время его посмотрело более 1 200 000 человек, часть из них — студенты девяти вузов, где картина побывала на гастролях. Наблюдая за фильмом со стороны и анали…

❤17🐳5👍5🔥3🤔2

2 Sept 2026, 13:46 UTC≈6,340 views36 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Робот-консультант в Саратове пошел в атаку на покупателя 🥊 С таким заголовком разлетается видео «нападения» робота Сёмы на посетителя одного из магазинов техники. Причем покупатель первым наехал на робота — толкнул его. Видео забавное, на уровне факапов с Игр гуманоидных роботов в Китае. Но у нас есть подозрение, что все это — хороший вирусный рекламный ролик. Так что если ваш робот и правда сошел с ума и лезет др…

😁24🐳4🤔4😈2❤1🤯1

31 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈4,640 views20 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Компьютер с огоньком 😮 Инженер под ником PickentCode собрал полностью автономное «вычислительное устройство на тепловом двигателе» — кастомный микрокомпьютер, работающий от... огня! А точнее — двигателя Стирлинга. Устройство двигателя (его ключевого элемента — «экономайзера тепла») было запатентовано шотландским священником и изобретателем Робертом Стирлингом в 1816 году. Да, священником. Как так вышло 🫪 Стирлинг…

🔥20

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @positivehackmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@positivehackmedia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz772 voters

В 1991 году был один веб-сайт. А сколько их появилось за 35 лет? 🤔

  1. 10 миллионов2%
  2. 150 миллионов2%
  3. 470 миллионов6%
  4. 1 миллиард5%
  5. 1,5 миллиарда13%
  6. 3 миллиарда10%
  7. 4,5 миллиарда19%
  8. 7 миллиардов43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,449
#1
IT's positive investing
@positive_investing · 9,189
#2
Positive Events
@PositiveEvents · 6,116
#3
BI.ZONE
@bizone_channel · 11,609
#4
YAH
@YAH_Channel · 7,632
#5
RED Security
@redsecurity_co · 5,199
#6
Innostage
@innostage_group · 2,804
#7
CISOCLUB - кибербезопасность и ИТ
@cisoclub · 7,191
#8
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
#9
PT Product Update
@ptproductupdate · 1,861
#10
CyberOK_news
@cyberok_news · 1,392
#11
OFFZONE
@offzone_moscow · 7,536
#12
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,431
#13
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
#14
Standoff 365
@standoff_365 · 8,448
#15
Positive Development Community
@POSIdev · 3,243
#16
ESCalator
@ptescalator · 8,385
#17
Резбез
@Rez_in_Bez · 2,643
#18
Похек
@poxek · 17,302
#19
Багхантер 2.0
@bughunter_circuit · 18,747
#20
Управление Уязвимостями и прочее
@avleonovrus · 12,628
#21
RuSecJobs Channel
@RuSecJobs · 11,614
#22
Кибербез образование | cybersecurity-roadmap.ru
@cyber_edu · 6,012
#23
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,194
#24
CyberCamp
@CYBERCAMP_ONLINE · 8,742
#25
BI.ZONE Bug Bounty
@bizone_bugbounty · 6,732
#26
Топ кибербезопасности Батранкова
@safebdv · 9,995
#27
Positive Labs
@positivelabs · 1,580
#28
AppSec Journey
@AppSecJourney · 3,539
#29
Солар
@solar_security · 6,636
#30
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
#31
КИБЕР МЕДИА
@secmedia · 6,091
#32
AM Live
@anti_malware · 13,159
#33
0day Alert
@ZerodayAlert · 11,819
#34
MEPhI CTF
@mephictf · 2,978
#35
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
#36
Hacker News
@HNews · 7,260
#37
Sachok
@CyberSachok · 11,349
#38
Кибердом
@cyberdom_business · 12,761
#39
infosec
@it_secur · 63,401
#40
PWN AI
@pwnai · 7,655
#41
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,022,997
#42
Мероприятия по ИБ
@InfoBezEvents · 5,693
#43
Новости SPbCTF
@spbctfnews · 3,162
#44
CTF News
@ctfnews · 5,062
#45
PRO:PENTEST
@pro_pentest · 10,223
#46
Кибервойна
@cyberguerre · 8,923
#47
Blue (h/c)at Café
@bh_cat · 4,007
#48
SOC FORUM | Неделя кибербезопасности
@forumsoc · 3,203
#49
ИТ-Пикник
@IT_picnic · 22,795
#50
Makrushin
@makrushin · 4,100
#51
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,728
#52
Kaspersky
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
#53
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
#54
НеКасперский
@NeKaspersky · 16,203
#55
Just Security
@justsecurity · 3,710
#56
Порвали два трояна
@kasperskyb2b · 9,461
#57
disasm.me channel
@disasm_me_ch · 2,952
#58
k8s (in)security
@k8security · 13,332
#59
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 232,434
#60
Cybersecurity memes off
@cybersecurity_memes_off · 1,705
#61
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 124,696
#62
README.hta
@s3Ch1n7 · 3,241
#63
CyberED
@cyberedrussia · 5,065
#64
GIS о кибербезопасности
@gis_cybersec · 11,896
#65
Echelon Eyes
@EchelonEyes · 6,541
#66
PT DESIGN
@pt_design_creative · 252
#67
Cybred
@cybred · 11,435
#68
Солдатов в Телеграм
@soldatov_in_telegram · 2,286
#69
PurpleBear
@purple_medved · 4,667
#70
VolgaCTF
@volgactf · 1,390
#71
Код ИБ: ИИ & КиберБезопасность
@codeibnews · 7,007
#72
Омский багхантер
@bughunter_omsk · 1,583
#73
infosecurity
@tg_infosec · 26,845
#74
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,538,229
#75
PT Knockin
@knckn · 476
#76
MireaCTF
@mireactf · 1,242
#77
APT
@APT_Notes · 17,360
#78
AlexRedSec
@alexredsec · 4,034
#79
Вакансии в ИБ | infosec
@infosec_work · 16,358
#80
PT SWARM
@ptswarm · 7,613
#81
Information Security Memes
@infosecmemes · 9,619
#82
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#83
PT Career Hub
@ptcareerhub · 2,992
#84
БДУ ФСТЭК России
@bdufstecru · 10,641
#85
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 117,768
#86
Bounty On Coffee
@BountyOnCoffee · 4,821
#87
CyberSquatting RU Alerts
@CyberSquattingChannel · 2,512
#88

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,449
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
КиберДед official
@deedcoin_club · 23,008
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Kaspersky
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,431
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Positive Hack Days Media” (@positivehackmedia), 30,043 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/positivehackmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.