15 measurements spanning 7 days, net -162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,260–31,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:34
31,284
-8
12 Aug 2026, 10:07
31,292
-10
12 Aug 2026, 01:52
31,302
-22
11 Aug 2026, 06:34
31,324
-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:18
31,326
-15
10 Aug 2026, 07:29
31,341
-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:52
31,346
-17
9 Aug 2026, 05:01
31,363
-2
8 Aug 2026, 23:03
31,365
-25
8 Aug 2026, 02:56
31,390
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:17
31,390
-21
7 Aug 2026, 02:50
31,411
-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:14
31,413
-32
6 Aug 2026, 05:20
31,445
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:05
31,446
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 31,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,330
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
17 (30 May 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
43,350
Reactions total
807
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 15s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,062 reactions across 16 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
246
23.2%
🔥
181
17.0%
🐳
119
11.2%
🌭
76
7.16%
🍓
69
6.50%
😱
60
5.65%
🌚
43
4.05%
👏
42
3.95%
😁
42
3.95%
🎃
38
3.58%
🤓
23
2.17%
👍
18
1.69%
👌
15
1.41%
💅
12
1.13%
🤣
11
1.04%
🍌
10
0.942%
custom 5391025250378986854
7
0.659%
👀
7
0.659%
custom 5398079351910578318
6
0.565%
✍
5
0.471%
14 further kinds
32
3.01%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,092reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В России пироги будут доставлять аэростатом 🎈
Как тебе такое Ило... А хотя, ладно
В июне в Москве открылось «самое нишевое кафе» — «Балканы». Его на балконе своей квартиры открыл выпускник МИФИ Петр Мартюк.
Заказы он принимал по SMS, а готовые пироги из домашней духовки спускал покупателям на веревке с пятого этажа. Но соседям ежедневный поток гостей под окнами не понравился — через месяц кафе пришлось закрыть.
З…
Мне, пожалуйста, Steam Machine за тыщу баксов — и бонусом утечку данных 💦
В конце июля логистический гигант CEVA Logistics подвергся кибератаке, в результате которой были похищены данные клиентов ее партнеров.
Громкие заголовки кричат об утечке данных покупателей устройств Valve — Steam Machine и Steam Controller. И не врут. Но пострадали не только фанаты Steam.
Что вообще произошло 🙁
CEVA Logistics — одна из кру…
Москва, 2026 год
Фотки — не ИИ (ну, почти), таблички уж точно.
А какие бы нам знаки установить к PHDays Fest 2027? Предлагайте в комментах 🤨
@PositiveHackMedia
В Москве тестируют поезд будущего 🚇
По БКЛ курсирует состав с надписью «Это беспилотный поезд». Пока он не перевозит пассажиров — идет этап тестирования.
Но уже в следующем году он откроет двери для жителей и гостей столицы
Состав проходит испытания уже полгода: за это время поезд проехал более 4 тысяч километров. В кабине по-прежнему находится машинист для контроля безопасности, но за все это время ему ни разу не…
Теперь можно заказать робота-уборщика на дом… но есть нюанс 🕺
В Сан-Франциско стартап Tau Robotics запустил сервис уборки андроидом: его можно вызвать всего за $30 в час. Он умеет пылесосить пол, вытирать пыль и выносить мусор. Симфонию написать все еще не может.
Перед тем как расскажем о нюансе, посмотрите на этого добряка на видео.
А теперь открывайте спойлер:
За каждым таким «железным клинером» стоит кожаный ч…
Вместо нового «Человека-паука»... предлагаем пока посмотреть на роболодку-паука 😏
Инженеры из Китая и США создали QuadBoat — дружелюбного беспилотного робота для поиска и спасения людей на воде. Вдохновлялись они Томом Холландом пауками-рыболовами: за счет длинных водоотталкивающих лапок они распределяют свой вес по поверхности воды и буквально бегают по ней.
В спасательных операциях счет идет на секунды: нужно как…
Поговорил с DeepSeek — уволен...
Или все же не из-за него? 🤷♂️
В Москве топ-менеджера с зарплатой 800 тысяч рублей уволили за разглашение коммерческой тайны: девушка пересылала рабочие документы на личную почту и загружала их в том числе в DeepSeek, пишут СМИ.
Она решила оспорить увольнение через суд: попросила заменить формулировку на «расторжение по соглашению сторон», чтобы не портить запись в трудовой, а заодн…
Кубик Рубика знаете? У него есть более сложный родственник — мегаминкс
У головоломки 12 граней и 12 цветов, а количество возможных состояний — примерно 10⁶⁸ (число из 69 цифр). Для сравнения: у классического кубика 3×3 — около 4,3×10¹⁹ вариантов (число из 20 цифр).
Если проверять по одной комбинации в секунду, на перебор всех вариантов мегаминкса не хватит даже текущего возраста Вселенной.
Но люди научились собира…
ЧМ-2026 закончился, а цифровые аватары игроков — остались 🤩
Пока болельщики следили за игрой любимых команд, FIFA добавила в футбол немного киберпанка.
Перед турниром каждого игрока попросили зайти на 90 секунд в специальную будку (нет, не ту, что была в «Футураме» 🕺).
Единый снимок с 36 камер — и готово. Система создавала цифровой аватар футболиста с точными параметрами тела: от длины стопы до пропорций конечност…
👏29❤26🔥20💘4😁4👍2👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @positivehackmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В 1991 году был один веб-сайт. А сколько их появилось за 35 лет? 🤔
10 миллионов2%
150 миллионов2%
470 миллионов6%
1 миллиард4%
1,5 миллиарда13%
3 миллиарда11%
4,5 миллиарда20%
7 миллиардов42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 435,249 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Positive Hack Days Media” (@positivehackmedia), 31,284 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/positivehackmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
