№ 6896897112
Вакансии, аналитика рынка ИБ.
Контакт - @maximbautin
Rules - не материться, не переходить на личности, не флудить и оффтопить.
Правила публикации вакансий - https://github.com/cyberjobsrussia/jobspostingrules/
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 95 days, net +497. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,042–11,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 11:20
11,614
+8
6 Nov 2026, 12:20
11,606
+2
5 Nov 2026, 09:09
11,604
-3
4 Nov 2026, 06:37
11,607
+4
3 Nov 2026, 06:29
11,603
+6
2 Nov 2026, 08:05
11,597
+1
1 Nov 2026, 06:06
11,596
+2
31 Oct 2026, 06:01
11,594
+8
30 Oct 2026, 07:14
11,586
+2
29 Oct 2026, 07:19
11,584
+4
28 Oct 2026, 04:40
11,580
+9
27 Oct 2026, 04:06
11,571
+6
26 Oct 2026, 06:40
11,565
-1
25 Oct 2026, 04:45
11,566
+1
24 Oct 2026, 04:29
11,565
+1
23 Oct 2026, 03:46
11,564
+7
22 Oct 2026, 03:48
11,557
+13
20 Oct 2026, 20:21
11,544
+11
19 Oct 2026, 21:20
11,533
+7
18 Oct 2026, 23:07
11,526
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 11,614 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,120
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.832%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
33 (21 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
32,950
Reactions total
274
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 21:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈91
Videos
≈10
Links
≈1,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,391 reactions across 32 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💊
295
21.2%
👎
223
16.0%
😁
180
12.9%
🤣
139
9.99%
🍌
125
8.99%
❤
109
7.84%
👍
77
5.54%
🌭
59
4.24%
🔥
40
2.88%
🙈
40
2.88%
🥱
22
1.58%
🤪
13
0.935%
🗿
12
0.863%
💅
10
0.719%
🤨
7
0.503%
🦄
6
0.431%
✍
5
0.359%
👀
4
0.288%
🏆
3
0.216%
🐳
3
0.216%
13 further kinds
19
1.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,391 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.03%
1 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,110
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,580
over 32 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGwC3Ue
1
9 November 2026
9 November 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#вакансия #пентестер #Pentester #InfoSec #ИБ #RedTeam #BugBounty #Metascan #удаленка
🧡Ищем Специалиста по анализу защищенности / Пентестер (Внешний периметр)
🚀 ЗП вилка: 250 к - 300 к руб./мес. на руки. + хорошие бонусы
🔸грейд: мидлд/мидл+
🔸формат работы: Удаленка,
🔸Компания: Метаскан https://metascan.ru/
Ищем специалиста, который умеет не просто находить уязвимости, но и проверять их реальную эксплуатацию — от …
17 ноября Альфа-Банк приглашает экспертов безопасной разработки на AI AppSec Night — вечер холиваров, ток-шоу про CyberSec AI и острые темы. Команды будут соревноваться в игре «Что? Где? Безопасность!». Ведущий - Сергей Николенко, двукратный чемпион мира по ЧГК, исследователь темы искусственного интеллекта в России.
Формат — офлайн в Москве или онлайн из любого города. Участие бесплатное, по регистрации.
Web3 Tech — ведущий разработчик продуктов на основе блокчейн-технологий, создатель блокчейн-платформы «Конфидент», включенной в реестр российского ПО.
Мы реализовали Национальную систему дистанционного электронного голосования, разработали блокчейн-платформу для Федеральной налоговой службы, создали платформу для работы с Цифровыми финансовыми активами (ЦФА) для Альфа-Банка, Тинькофф и др.
Сейчас расширяем команду и…
Web3 Tech — ведущий разработчик продуктов на основе блокчейн-технологий, создатель блокчейн-платформы «Конфидент», включенной в реестр российского ПО.
Мы реализовали Национальную систему дистанционного электронного голосования, разработали блокчейн-платформу для Федеральной налоговой службы, создали платформу для работы с Цифровыми финансовыми активами (ЦФА) для Альфа-Банка, Тинькофф и др.
Сейчас расширяем команду и…
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Консольные решения или IDE — OpenCode, Codex и т. д.47%
Через API, собственные интеграции20%
Пока не использую LLM9%
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Presale Manager, AI Security (MLSec)
Локация: удалённо
Опыт: от 2 лет
ЗП: от 160 000 руб. (по итогам собеседования)
ScanFactory (аккредитованная IT-компания)
Мы ищем технического эксперта в команду MLSec (Machine Learning Security), который поможет продвигать AI Firewall — решение для защиты приложений на базе искусственного интеллекта.
Нам нужен специалист, который понимает, как работает ИИ, разбирается в связанны…
Руководитель группы безопасности приложений бизнес-линий — Russ&Wildberries 💜
ЗП: конкурентная (обсуждается лично)
Уровень: Team Lead
Формат: удаленка или гибрид
⚙️ RWB — это не просто маркетплейс, а огромная экосистема из 500+ продуктов.
Мы ищем сильного тимлида с техническим бэкграундом. В вашей зоне ответственности будет множество продуктов различных бизнес-линий. Каждая бизнес-линия обладает своими особенностя…
OSINT-аналитик в международный iGaming проект
Мы разрабатываем iGaming-продукты для глобального рынка: от платежной инфраструктуры до аналитических систем. Нам 10+ лет, строим собственные решения с нуля и активно растём.
🔹 От 160 000 ₽ net до 180 000 ₽ net
🔹 Офис в Москва-Сити, график 5/2(только офисный формат)
🔹 Оборудование, доступ к топовым OSINT-инструментам, участие в конференциях
Что делать:
— собирать и ана…
🤣48😁25🍌9👎6🌭3💅3❤2👨💻2
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @RuSecJobs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @RuSecJobs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Консольные решения или IDE — OpenCode, Codex и т. д.47%
Через API, собственные интеграции20%
Пока не использую LLM9%
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS @forensictools · 22,610 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
Positive Hack Days Media @positivehackmedia · 30,042 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Утечки информации @dataleak · 117,675 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
infosecurity @tg_infosec · 26,845 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Листок бюрократической защиты информации @bureaucraticsecurity · 19,134 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 October 2026
Offensive Xwitter @OffensiveTwitter · 21,323 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Social Engineering @Social_engineering · 124,696 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6 @f6_cybersecurity · 22,363 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU @xakep_ru · 40,313 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Devops Jobs — вакансии и резюме @devops_jobs_feed · 22,291 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
SecAtor @true_secator · 42,213 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
S.E.Book @S_E_Book · 23,090 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
S.E.Reborn @S_E_Reborn · 22,449 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Интернет-Розыск @irozysk · 45,710 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Об ЭП и УЦ @ep_uc · 21,400 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
IT и безопасность @tg_security · 26,805 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Codeby @codeby_sec · 37,083 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
SecurityLab.ru @SecLabNews · 86,532 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Russian OSINT @Russian_OSINT · 48,514 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Positive Technologies @Positive_Technologies · 29,449 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого @alukatsky · 38,465 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
infosec @it_secur · 63,440 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Пакет Безопасности @package_security · 33,728 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер @haccking · 63,021 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RuSecJobs Channel” (@RuSecJobs), 11,614 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RuSecJobs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.