Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ESCalator

Channel

ESCalator

@ptescalator

Not marked by Telegram, checked 20 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,385subscribers

+426 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002218469680
TypeChannel
Username@ptescalator
DescriptionTips and tricks от команды экспертного центра безопасности Positive Technologies (PT ESC)
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ptescalator

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9598,3858,1726 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,963 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,962 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,966 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,976 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,985 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,993 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,988 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,989 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,984 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,005 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,023 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,039 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,127 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,160 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,208 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,221 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,231 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,243 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,261 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,276 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,300 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,322 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,336 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,350 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,385 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 96 days, net +426. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,895–8,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:598,385+35
6 Nov 2026, 15:078,350+14
4 Nov 2026, 01:078,336+14
1 Nov 2026, 07:468,322+22
28 Oct 2026, 23:578,300+24
25 Oct 2026, 22:168,276+15
23 Oct 2026, 00:478,261+18
20 Oct 2026, 07:288,243+12
17 Oct 2026, 16:168,231+10
14 Oct 2026, 11:098,221+13
10 Oct 2026, 20:568,208+48
4 Oct 2026, 17:598,160+33
25 Sept 2026, 04:218,127+88
15 Sept 2026, 09:168,039+16
11 Sept 2026, 18:588,023+18
7 Sept 2026, 08:168,005+21
2 Sept 2026, 16:377,984-5
30 Aug 2026, 15:057,989+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:537,988-5
24 Aug 2026, 14:447,993first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 8,385 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,640
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held35 (23 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total32,740
Reactions total357
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 00:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
624
Videos
8
Links
273

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,393 reactions across 35 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥43130.9%
👍25418.2%
❤25118.0%
😁16712.0%
🤣362.58%
👏332.37%
✍302.15%
😭161.15%
🙏151.08%
😱141.01%
👀130.933%
😍130.933%
🤯120.861%
😎100.718%
🤝100.718%
⚡80.574%
🤡80.574%
🍾70.503%
🫡70.503%
🌭60.431%
21 further kinds523.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC≈1,740 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤19👍14🔥11💋1😍1

5 Nov 2026, 08:18 UTC≈2,480 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍22❤13🔥13

30 Oct 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,950 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Как думаете, кто из них реальный человек? 🗿

  1. Kelly Glover2%
  2. Douglas Davis1%
  3. Амелия Колосова3%
  4. Элина Козел10%
  5. Carmen Márquez1%
  6. Lex Priori3%
  7. መቅዲ የታሜ ሊጅ16%
  8. Егор Дворник16%
  9. Sexy💖 Derlie🫂❤️💍32%
  10. Илья Долгоруков18%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁21🤣18👍5

30 Oct 2026, 08:18 UTC≈3,020 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

NTFS снова переполняет буфер 🫠 Продолжаем разбирать уязвимости в драйвере NTFS для Windows. На этот раз CVE-2026-50494 — heap-based buffer overflow in ntfs!AnalysisPass. В чем проблема? При восстановлении журнала $LogFile драйвер копирует данные в запись таблицы OAT, не проверяя, помещаются ли они в выделенную область памяти. В итоге можно записать гораздо больше, чем выделено, и повредить память ядра Windows. Сраб…

🔥12👍8❤6

29 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,970 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

1398 дней — василиска вызывали? 🔮 Команда PT ESC IR обнаружила новую APT-группировку StingyBasilisk. При расследовании инцидента мы выявили следы ее активности как минимум с апреля 2022 года. Свое название группировка получила из-за активного использования именованных каналов (named pipes) Windows для управления ВПО и трудностей с обнаружением полезной нагрузки. StingyBasilisk оставалась незамеченной 1398 дней и з…

🔥12🫡6👍5✍1

28 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC≈8,800 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

140+ дел за год 🗂 Команда PT ESC IR выпустила ежегодное исследование о результатах 140+ проектов по расследованию инцидентов и ретроспективному анализу с IV квартала 2025-го по III квартал 2026 года. Проектов стало на 40% больше, чем годом ранее. Главные итоги • Больше чем в половине проектов злоумышленникам удалось нарушить работу компаний. В 21,2% случаев мы выявили разведывательную деятельность и кибершпионаж, …

❤27🔥21👍16🤯2🏆1🤝1

26 Oct 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,080 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

PT ESC на SOC Forum 2026 Завтра наши эксперты выступят с двумя докладами — о том, как инфоповоды становятся отправной точкой для атак и что показали расследования киберинцидентов за год. ➡️ От инфоповода до атаки 10:00 | Зал «Кинетика» | Офлайн Новость о громкой уязвимости, разбор чужой атаки или событие в отрасли — все это может стать основой для следующей кампании злоумышленников. Вопрос в том, можно ли заметить…

❤16👍13🔥12😍2👏1

23 Oct 2026, 17:19 UTC≈4,350 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁13👀4😭3

23 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈3,350 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥18❤7👍7⚡5

9 Oct 2026, 18:09 UTC≈4,240 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

На какой доклад пойдете? 🧐

  1. Про атаки ИИ 🥊7%
  2. Про защиту ИИ 👀3%
  3. Про ИИ-защиту на ИИ-атаки 😮4%
  4. Про ИИ-атаки на ИИ-защиту от ИИ-атак 👏6%
  5. Про ИИ от ИИ 🤖3%
  6. Про ИИ без ИИ 💡3%
  7. ИИ что теперь? 🤷‍♀️4%
  8. Не пойду, отправлю ИИ-агента 🧠18%
  9. Пойду в ПТУ на сварщика, пожалуй… 🧑‍🏭34%
  10. Я закончил делать опрос, получилось десять пунктов, хотите, я сделаю его еще смешнее?19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁18🔥6😢5🍾4🍌2🌭1🫡1

8 Oct 2026, 15:49 UTC≈5,980 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Главная новость этой недели У нас появился сайт: https://ptesc.tech/ Мы за удобство — поэтому теперь все наши материалы, помимо соцсетей, будут выходить еще и там: на русском и английском. В планах — публиковать большие исследования, которые не уместить в стандартный пост. Кстати, все публикации из ESCalator мы уже перенесли в блог. 👋 А теперь новость внутри новости: к запуску сайта мы подготовили серию постов пр…

🔥36❤17😍10🤣5🍾3👍2

29 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC≈5,400 views39 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤16🔥14👍8🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @ptescalator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2026, 16:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz457 voters

Как думаете, кто из них реальный человек? 🗿

  1. Kelly Glover2%
  2. Douglas Davis1%
  3. Амелия Колосова3%
  4. Элина Козел10%
  5. Carmen Márquez1%
  6. Lex Priori3%
  7. መቅዲ የታሜ ሊጅ16%
  8. Егор Дворник16%
  9. Sexy💖 Derlie🫂❤️💍32%
  10. Илья Долгоруков18%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Oct 2026, 18:09 UTCAnonymous Poll546 voters

На какой доклад пойдете? 🧐

  1. Про атаки ИИ 🥊7%
  2. Про защиту ИИ 👀3%
  3. Про ИИ-защиту на ИИ-атаки 😮4%
  4. Про ИИ-атаки на ИИ-защиту от ИИ-атак 👏6%
  5. Про ИИ от ИИ 🤖3%
  6. Про ИИ без ИИ 💡3%
  7. ИИ что теперь? 🤷‍♀️4%
  8. Не пойду, отправлю ИИ-агента 🧠18%
  9. Пойду в ПТУ на сварщика, пожалуй… 🧑‍🏭34%
  10. Я закончил делать опрос, получилось десять пунктов, хотите, я сделаю его еще смешнее?19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,449
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,431
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,043
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Kaspersky
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,194
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
IT и безопасность
@tg_security · 26,812
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,021
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ESCalator” (@ptescalator), 8,385 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptescalator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.