Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Blue (h/c)at Café

@bh_cat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,943subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941688934
TypeChannel
Username@bh_cat
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bh_cat

Growth

3,9403,9473,943.56 August 2026 — 3,947 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,944 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,940 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,943 subscribers3,9436 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,939–3,948 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:473,943+3
9 Aug 2026, 17:513,940-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:213,944-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:353,947first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.5%
avg views ÷ 3,943 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.965%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (13 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,154
Reactions total98
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

461 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁21246.0%
13328.9%
🔥10522.8%
🤔71.52%
😡40.868%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 586reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
120
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 21 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bh_cat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC390 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Подобный трюк возможно провернуть и в Jira. Для этого достаточно получить доступ к связанной со службой базой данных, например, postgresql. Затем нужно сгенерировать хэш PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1 для пароля нового админ-пользователя и вставить в нужные таблицы, не забыв накинуть себе пару привилегированных групп администраторов : ) Основной "красной тряпкой", свидетельствующей о том, что перед нами база Jira яв

🔥52

4 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC724 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Shai-hulud 3.0 ChainDrop npm worm (keyv/cacheable maintainer compromise, Shai-Hulud-класс) Экосистема: npm Скомпрометирован GitHub-аккаунт мейнтейнера Jared Wray (keyv/cacheable/ecto). Отравлено 435 пакетов / 1557 версий, суммарный охват ~500M+ загрузок/неделю. preinstall-дроппер (setup.mjs) скачивает официальный Bun 1.3.13 и запускает Stage-2 (Math_Symbol.js / math_init.js, ~727KB), который скрапит GitHub Actions

4😡1

31 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC≈4,790 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🎸 Вышел Prowl 1.3.0 Главное в обновлении: 🔵 поиск секретов в PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, архивах и почтовых экспортax 🔵 локальный OCR для изображений и сканированных PDF 🔵 сканирование логов и артефактов GitHub Actions и GitLab CI 🔵 новые детекторы и проверка ключей DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Fireworks и Perplexity 🔵 усиленная защита от небезопасных URL, редиректов и архивных бомб 🔵 175 правил, 84 верификатора и 80 E2E-сцена

16🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,040 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Ребятам из MWS респект за https://github.com/mts-ai/MWS-Vision-Bench Из минусов - относительно мало примеров, но работа проделана хорошая UPD: и не указана скорость

6🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,390 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

☀️ Лето, вода, ИБ без пиджачков Обычно пресс-релиз конференции выглядит так, что его копипастят в двадцать каналов слово-в-слово, и вы это уже видели. Так воооот, тут я своими словами, потому что мероприятие мне реально по душе, и я бы сходил, даже если б меня не звали 17 июля CyberCamp впервые вылезает из онлайна на свежий воздух. Москва, "Берёзы Парк Строгино", у воды, с 11 утра и до восьми вечера. Опен-эйр-фести

🔥105

2 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,000 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Типичное начало любого диалога

😁25

27 Jun 2026, 18:24 UTC≈2,390 views38 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @right_wing_dev_squads

Приходит СТО в ит отдел и говорит: - Вот, пацаны, новая GLM-5.2, на уровне опуса качество! Разрабы собираются, смотрят такие, удивляются. СТО говорит: "Иванов, запусти на своем макбуке!" Иванов тужится, кряхтит: "Не хватает памяти, товарищ СТО!" СТО: "Сидоров, помоги ему!" Подключает Сидоров свой макбук, кряхтят, макбуки шумят вентиляторами: "Не запускается, товарищ СТО!" СТО: "Все вместе давайте!" Весь департамент о

😁38

26 Jun 2026, 22:28 UTC≈1,990 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Заведу и в этой помойке себе мини-канальчик, вдруг поможет чем-то https://x.com/sudo_belka

😁8🔥21

26 Jun 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,770 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vk_securityPhoto

📹 Второй выпуск «Спасибо за репорт» уже доступен! Разбираемся, как появился HackAdvisor и что на самом деле стоит за отзывами о программах: месяцы, а иногда и годы работы багхантеров. В первом выпуске вместе со Slonser мы обсуждали, как ИИ-агенты меняют багхантинг. Теперь — о том, как знания и опыт комьюнити помогают делать Bug Bounty лучше для всех участников. Наш гость — Заур Заурбаев (k3ypt0), создатель HackAdv

🔥125

25 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,330 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vk_securityVideo

🎙 Почему одни Bug Bounty-программы хочется рекомендовать, а другие — обходить стороной? Поговорим об этом завтра — в новом выпуске подкаста «Спасибо за репорт». В гостях — Заур Заурбаев, создатель HackAdvisor. Обсудим, как опыт сообщества помогает выбирать программы, зачем нужны отзывы и почему прозрачность важна для всей индустрии. Ставьте 👍, если ждёте новый выпуск! VK Security | Буст этому каналу #bugbounty

11🔥7😁1

23 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC≈2,810 views40 reactions110 Starsread 8 August 2026

🐸 Знакомьтесь - prowl Открытая бета Помните мой позапрошлый пост про ИИ-позорников? Про тех, кто закидывает промпт, нейронка делает всё за них, а они ставят подпись и идут на конфу? Так вот. Самое время показать, как это, по моему мнению, делается не по-позорному. И заодно подставиться под критику, потому что да - я тоже писал это с ИИ и готов разминировать первый позор после моего поста Двойные стандарты знаете?

🔥319

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @bh_cat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 253,867 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blue (h/c)at Café” (@bh_cat), 3,943 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bh_cat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.