Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

disasm.me channel

@disasm_me_ch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,521subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190113390
TypeChannel
Username@disasm_me_ch
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/disasm_me_ch

Growth

2,5112,5212,5166 August 2026 — 2,511 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,511 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,513 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,515 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,510–2,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:382,521+6
9 Aug 2026, 19:022,515+2
7 Aug 2026, 00:132,513+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:342,511no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:032,511first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 2,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
939
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held17 (18 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total5,632
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

289 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523558916416603232412242.2%
😁10737.0%
custom 53529721536690388304314.9%
custom 5235850315357497516144.84%
custom 523587906586857610720.692%
custom 535505021776063109810.346%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @disasm_me_ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC415 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptescalator

Posted without readable text

custom 52355891641660323249😁1

27 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC646 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52355891641660323247😁2

24 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC920 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У нас пропала реакция кота-клоуна 🤡 Прошу неравнодушных восстановить справедливость. Вместе мы обязательно справимся) UPD: кот-клоун восстановлен! Спасибо за небезучастность 😳 UPDUPD: в комментариях началось трёхдневное голосование за дополнительную реакцию UPDUPDUPD: новые дополнительные реакции добавлены: 🔫 🏃‍♀️ @disasm_me_ch

custom 535297215366903883033😁2custom 52358790658685761072custom 53550502177606310981

24 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC881 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет. Поехали в Москву на OFFZONE? 🏃‍♀️

custom 52355891641660323249custom 53529721536690388303

20 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,430 views16 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Интересное наблюдение с прошедшего CyberCamp насчёт отношения спикеров к ИИ С одной стороны у нас есть Сергей Зыбнев (автор канала Похек) и Иван Булавин (директор по продуктам программы Standoff 365, в которую входят багбаунти, киберполигон и онлайн-симулятор для блютима). Они положительно смотрят на ИИ и изучают, как он может усилить способности специалистов при решении задач пентеста, багбаунти, редтима, SOC, IR.

😁11custom 52355891641660323245

15 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,340 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523558916416603232412custom 52358503153574975164custom 53529721536690388304

8 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лето, парк, CyberCamp ❤️❤️ В следующую пятницу (17 июля) друзья из CyberCamp организовывают ИБ-мероприятие на свежем воздухе в парке в Строгино Трансляции не будет, да и лучше очно послушать последние изыскания Зыбнева (ведёт канал Похек) по ИИ-инструментам или про ИИ-багхантеров на Позитивной платформе Standoff) Я схожу 🐈 В программе 10 докладов по научпопу, ИИ, багбаунти. Темы докладов и спикеры — моё почтение

custom 523558916416603232412😁2

4 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,310 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptescalatorPhoto

Кто-то сказал sandbox? 👀 В очередной раз наблюдаем, как злоумышленники проводят неэтичные ресерчи. Дано: Исследователь по безопасности Nicholas Curran Он опубликовал пакеты с интересными названиями: 🌟2 пакета npm-sandbox-ping-[4 символа] 🌟8 пакетов npm-sandbox-research-[4 символа] 🌟postinstall-logger-7x9z 🌟pkg-telemetry-r4f9 🌟runtime-metrics-w7k2 🌟event-metrics-q3x7 🌟build-tracker-n5p1 Согласно описанию (скриншот

custom 52355891641660323248custom 53529721536690388302

29 Jun 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,980 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523558916416603232414😁6

24 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,490 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Занятное-актуальное хромовское Сталкиваюсь с ру-сайтами, которые не успели отреагировать на недавнюю волну с отзывом сертификатов GlobalSign. Chrome обычно на проблемы с сертификатами разрешает нажать "I accept the risk" и дальше продолжить пользоваться сайтом, но не в этом случае — для отозванных сертификатов или нарушения политики HSTS такой кнопки просто нет 😑 Но, если очень нужно, в Chrome на странице ошибки мо

custom 52355891641660323249😁1

16 Jun 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,530 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Абьюз site-packages: strikes back Мы с вами уже разбирали, что злоумышленники используют для закрепления стандартный модуль Python site — в атаке TeamPCP на LiteLLM. Нашёл ещё один кейс, который не будет ловиться простым правилом "возбуждаемся на .pth-файлы" Дано: PyPI-пакет temp-development-package-test 🤨 Во время установки пакета исполняется код на скриншоте 1. Его задача — скопировать заранее подготовленный фай

custom 52355891641660323248

11 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Нашёл этот шедевр. Кто-то похоже игрался с процентами — и проиграл Вайбкодовый мир победил, антропик оказался сильней @disasm_me_ch

😁19

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @disasm_me_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 413,534 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“disasm.me channel” (@disasm_me_ch), 2,521 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disasm_me_ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.