Channel
@s3Ch1n7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,189subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001708517982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @s3Ch1n7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/s3Ch1n7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 3,189 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 3,190 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 3,188 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 3,187 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
205 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 47.3% | |
| 🔥 | 87 | 42.4% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 5.85% | |
| custom 5330524382542448821 | 9 | 4.39% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s3Ch1n7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2026 to 2 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У меня никогда не было проблем с тайм-менеджментом А на вопрос «как ты всё успеваешь?» я честно отвечаю, что просто ничего не успеваю) Шутки шутками, но пришлось мне тут пересобрать с нуля свой список дел. Не потому что так советуют умные книжки (хотя меня вообще нельзя пускать в магазины нон-фикшн литературы 🫠), а потому что на какое-то время я вне основной работы, ресурса физически стало меньше, при этом выпадать…
❤32🔥25
File, posted without a caption
❤3
Частично пересмотрела записи с прошедшей ёпрст-конфы, из интересного:
(если кратко, продолжать использовать ::%16777216 как индикатор атаки разрешается, но ресерч конечно мощный)
😁8custom 53305243825424488214❤3
Добавила побольше информации на слайды, чтобы не терялась суть. Текста и так не по канонам много, поэтому подробности личных примеров из жизни останутся между нами с участниками митапа 🤫 Рабочие ссылки и исходный файл оставлю в описании
❤31🔥15😁4
Что делаем?
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤17🔥9custom 53305243825424488215
Вчера был первый и последний ивент в этом году по некоторым приятным для меня причинам, на котором мне удалось поделиться чем-то важным (помимо вебинаров инсеки, есессна) И да-да, зарекалась не выступать больше, но формат живого кулуарного общения соблазнил меня. Не буду скрывать, что чаще всего хожу на такие мероприятия с конкретной целью – познакомиться с новыми классными людьми. А иногда даже заранее прикидываю «…
🔥24❤7
➖ Методы обнаружения: • Нестандартные пути в InprocServer32 для системных CLSID (указывают не на System32). • Наличие ключа TreatAs у системных COM-объектов DLL почти всегда являются признаком компрометации, так как легитимные установки Windows его не используют для системных компонентов. • DLL, загруженные в svchost.exe или explorer.exe, расположенные вне System32 или Program Files — даже если DLL физически лежит…
🔥14❤4
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @s3Ch1n7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что делаем?
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,111,583 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“README.hta” (@s3Ch1n7), 3,189 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s3Ch1n7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.