Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6

Channel

Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6

@f6_cybersecurity

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,363subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140131646
TypeChannel
Username@f6_cybersecurity
DescriptionОстросюжетный Telegram-канал компании F6 об информационной безопасности, хакерах, APT, кибератаках, мошенниках и пиратах. Расследования по шагам, практические кейсы и рекомендации, как не стать жертвой. № 6884137476 № 6884168720
Created26 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/f6_cybersecurity

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,26722,37422,320.522,3636 August 20269 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,251–22,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 20:0822,363-8
8 Nov 2026, 12:4922,371+6
7 Nov 2026, 09:1622,365-2
6 Nov 2026, 09:4822,367+6
5 Nov 2026, 07:2722,361-1
3 Nov 2026, 07:4022,362-1
2 Nov 2026, 11:0122,363-1
1 Nov 2026, 13:1622,364-4
31 Oct 2026, 12:5622,368-2
30 Oct 2026, 15:3922,370-4
29 Oct 2026, 18:5922,374+1
28 Oct 2026, 18:0022,373+9
27 Oct 2026, 19:0122,364+5
26 Oct 2026, 20:5722,359-3
25 Oct 2026, 23:3622,362-2
25 Oct 2026, 03:0422,364-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:0022,370-2
23 Oct 2026, 02:4622,372+10
22 Oct 2026, 01:5922,362-6
20 Oct 2026, 19:1722,368first reading

Engagement

128 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.60%
avg views ÷ 22,363 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 128 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held128 (20 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total70,838
Reactions total965
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 15:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,350
Videos
≈145
Links
≈2,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 58s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,999 reactions across 121 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,46636.7%
👍70917.7%
❤62015.5%
👏3047.60%
😱2596.48%
✍1894.73%
😢952.38%
🤩882.20%
😁852.13%
custom 5300938831036444108711.78%
🎉531.33%
custom 5303084910230135846461.15%
custom 5303477676399418592140.35%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,217 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 128 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @f6_cybersecurity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 128 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (15.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC972 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📢 В новой статье Forbes CEO F6 Валерий Баулин рассказал, зачем компании выходить на биржу. Главное ⬇️ ▪️ Новый уровень узнаваемости и доверия к бренду F6, который появился на рынке в начале 2025 года: статус публичной компании подразумевает большую прозрачность и ответственность — перед инвесторами, клиентами и партнерами. ▪️ Инструмент мотивации команды: возможность участвовать в капитале напрямую связывает резуль…

🔥13👏11❤7👍2😁1

10 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,280 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Как «Промагролизинг» обнаружил забытые ИТ-активы и наладил контроль внешнего периметра. Новые сервисы появляются, проекты завершаются, а часть цифровых ресурсов продолжает работать. Со временем компания может потерять их из виду, хотя они по-прежнему доступны в интернете и могут содержать уязвимости. С такой проблемой столкнулся «Промагролизинг» — одна из крупнейших лизинговых компаний Беларуси. Чтобы разобрать…

🔥7👍6👏3

10 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,460 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔴 Ваши данные утекли. Что могут сделать мошенники и как от этого защититься? Утечки могут затронуть даже тех, кто не пользуется взломанным сервисом. Попавшая в открытый доступ информация может стать инструментом для целевых атак злоумышленников. Благодаря накопленной информации мошенники формируют досье на пользователя — это необходимо для большей убедительности. Как злоумышленники используют чужие данные и что дел…

❤7✍4👍4🔥3👏1

9 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,650 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Реальный кейс F6 MXDR: 20 000+ устройств, EDR и NTA. Как распознать APT-группировку, которую годами не замечают в инфраструктуре? Один подозрительный процесс на хосте не отражает реальный масштаб атаки. Пока ИТ-сервисы работают штатно, APT-группировка может месяцами или годами изучать инфраструктуру и создавать новые точки доступа. В новом блоге F6 разбираем реальный кейс и показываем, как EDR и NTA помогают оце…

🔥14❤7👍7👏3🤩1

9 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,650 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Покупайте индийское»: как устроена новая схема криптоскама? Специалисты Fraud Protection F6 обнаружили новый сценарий мошенничества с цифровыми валютами. ▪️ Злоумышленники действуют от имени менеджера HR-агентства — якобы подбирают «партнеров для коммерческих направлений», связанных с торговыми операциями между Россией и Индией. ▪️ Пользователю пишут в Telegram и предлагают стать участником программы развития «ци…

😱5✍3🔥3❤2😢2👍1👏1🤩1

6 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,880 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Как устроен бизнес на кибербезопасности? Большое интервью CEO F6 Валерия Баулина. Кибератаки становятся более сложными и персонализированными. С помощью ИИ злоумышленники создают убедительные фишинговые письма, имитируют деловую переписку и адаптируют сценарии под потенциальных жертв. Как в этих условиях развивается бизнес в сфере кибербезопасности и какие технологии помогают компаниям противостоять угрозам? В …

🔥10👍6❤5😁1

6 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,770 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ключи от сейфа не оставляют в замке. А токен от интернет-банка? Сотрудник отошёл, а на компьютере осталось открыто ДБО и подключён токен. Даже короткое отсутствие оставляет рабочее место без контроля. Атака может начаться и раньше: с письма, замаскированного под сообщение банка, файла с бухгалтерским шаблоном или неожиданного запроса на удалённый доступ. В чек-листе «Как защитить доступ и платежи в ДБО» собрали 5 …

👏6✍5❤4🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,840 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎥 Пиратам не сидится на берегу: «Вышка 2» и «Глубина» возглавили рейтинг фильмов и сериалов за октябрь. Каждый месяц F6 по просьбе «Бюллетеня кинопрокатчика» составляет список фильмов и сериалов, наибольшее количество нелегальных копий (не просмотров) которых было обнаружено в этом месяце. Топ-5 копируемых фильмов за октябрь ⬇️ 1️⃣ «Вышка 2» 2️⃣ «Человек-паук: Новый день» 3️⃣ «Курьер» 4️⃣ «Собачьи звёзды» 5️⃣ «Жив…

🔥10👍5✍3❤2

5 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,910 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Сколько подрядчиков имеют доступ к вашей инфраструктуре? 📍 19 ноября на вебинаре специалисты F6 разберут реальные кейсы атак через подрядчиков и представят новое решение для мониторинга и оценки их защищенности. Почему это важно? У каждого контрагента своя инфраструктура, интеграции с вашими системами и потенциальные уязвимости. При этом об уровне его защиты часто можно судить лишь по анкете. Взломать небольшую ко…

🔥15✍8👍5

5 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,890 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔍 Как устроен инвестскам? Первая часть большого исследования от департамента расследований F6. История инвестиционного мошенничества насчитывает уже больше четырех столетий. В наши дни одна из самых популярных схем в этой сфере — фейковые брокеры. В первом блоге эксперты F6 рассказали о технологической стороне социальной инженерии — в частности, о торговых платформах, которые используют скамеры, и о связях разработ…

🔥9👍7😱3

3 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,140 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👀 Атака на корпоративное ДБО может начаться задолго до попытки платежа. Новое устройство, необычное поведение в сессии, признаки удаленного управления — важно не только заметить эти сигналы, но и учесть их при принятии решения по операции. Мы подготовили экспресс-тест из 9 вопросов, который поможет проверить, насколько корпоративный интернет-банк защищен от подобных угроз. После прохождения — результат, рекомендац…

🔥5👍3custom 53030849102301358463❤2

3 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,390 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

😧 Киберпреступники приглашают на секретный концерт в рамках новой мошеннической схемы. F6 совместно со специалистами Минобороны России обнаружили новый сценарий атак на родственников участников СВО. От имени вымышленного «Комитета по делам семей участников СВО» злоумышленники создали сеть как минимум из 11 сайтов. Они оформлены как приглашение на концерт-награждение «в память о героях СВО». ▪️ На сайтах указана да…

😱11👍7✍4😢3❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @f6_cybersecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@f6_cybersecurity edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 October 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

BI.ZONE
@bizone_channel · 11,624
#1
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,465
#2
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,213
#3
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
#4
Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,469
#5
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 117,675
#6
AM Live
@anti_malware · 13,159
#7
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
#8
Похек
@poxek · 17,321
#9
ESCalator
@ptescalator · 8,385
#10
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
#11
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 124,696
#12
Солар
@solar_security · 6,636
#13
НеКасперский
@NeKaspersky · 16,203
#14
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
#15
RED Security
@redsecurity_co · 5,199
#16
Порвали два трояна
@kasperskyb2b · 9,461
#17
YAH
@YAH_Channel · 7,632
#18
CyberCamp
@CYBERCAMP_ONLINE · 8,742
#19
Kaspersky
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
#20
README.hta
@s3Ch1n7 · 3,241
#21
Sachok
@CyberSachok · 11,349
#22
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,610
#23
APT
@APT_Notes · 17,360
#24
Pandora's box
@pandora_intelligence · 4,154
#25
T.Hunter
@tomhunter · 14,174
#26
Cybred
@cybred · 11,435
#27
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,021
#28
AlexRedSec
@alexredsec · 4,030
#29
CISOCLUB - кибербезопасность и ИТ
@cisoclub · 7,191
#30
Positive Events
@PositiveEvents · 6,116
#31
Inside
@in51d3 · 7,962
#32
S.E.Reborn
@S_E_Reborn · 22,449
#33
КИБЕР МЕДИА
@secmedia · 6,091
#34
Makrushin
@makrushin · 4,100
#35
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,728
#36
SOC FORUM | Неделя кибербезопасности
@forumsoc · 3,193
#37
Blue (h/c)at Café
@bh_cat · 4,007
#38
Мыслить как безопасник
@artemov_security · 9,211
#39
Топ кибербезопасности Батранкова
@safebdv · 9,995
#40
PR machine
@PR_machine_Nika · 3,713
#41
Angara Security
@angarasecurity · 1,603
#42
PurpleBear
@purple_medved · 4,667
#43
R-Vision
@rvision_pro · 2,519
#44
Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,748
#45
infosecurity
@tg_infosec · 26,845
#46
Код ИБ: ИИ & КиберБезопасность
@codeibnews · 7,007
#47
CyberED
@cyberedrussia · 5,071
#48
OFFZONE
@offzone_moscow · 7,536
#49
RuSecJobs Channel
@RuSecJobs · 11,614
#50
CyberSquatting RU Alerts
@CyberSquattingChannel · 2,512
#51
Group-IB
@Group_IB · 2,659
#52
Управление Уязвимостями и прочее
@avleonovrus · 12,628
#53
Кибервойна
@cyberguerre · 8,923
#54
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#55
Вакансии в ИБ | infosec
@infosec_work · 16,358
#56
Hacker News
@HNews · 7,261
#57
МемыСкрепы 2
@memiskrepi2 · 2,229
#58
infosec
@it_secur · 63,440
#59
BI.ZONE Bug Bounty
@bizone_bugbounty · 6,732
#60
Багхантер 2.0
@bughunter_circuit · 18,747
#61
Резбез
@Rez_in_Bez · 2,643
#62
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,021,350
#63
CTT Report Hub
@aptreports · 3,547
#64
БДУ ФСТЭК России
@bdufstecru · 10,641
#65
Банкста
@banksta · 439,838
#66
PRO:PENTEST
@pro_pentest · 10,223
#67
ГосСОПКА Центр
@sopkacentr · 6,134
#68
Илья Сачков
@Ilya_Sachkov · 7,314
#69
Солдатов в Телеграм
@soldatov_in_telegram · 2,290
#70
PT SWARM
@ptswarm · 7,613
#71
Кибербез образование | cybersecurity-roadmap.ru
@cyber_edu · 6,012
#72
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 232,434
#73
Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,042
#74
Мероприятия по ИБ
@InfoBezEvents · 5,693
#75
purple shift
@purpleshift · 3,191
#76
k8s (in)security
@k8security · 13,332
#77
Анонсы ИБ мероприятий
@secwebinars · 6,137
#78
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,889
#79
True OSINT
@trueosint · 10,103
#80
Positive Development Community
@POSIdev · 3,243
#81
BeholderIsHere Media HUB
@BeholderIsHereHub · 3,252
#82
Security Vision
@svplatform · 5,461
#83
Information Security Memes
@infosecmemes · 9,619
#84
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,872
#85

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Утечки информации
@dataleak · 117,675
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Ленинградский Cyber - страж
@LenCyber78 · 150,796
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 August 2026
Kaspersky
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,469
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,213
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Вестник Киберполиции России
@cyberpolice_rus · 82,852
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
IT и безопасность
@tg_security · 26,805
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,465
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,042
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,021
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,889
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 124,696
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
КиберДед official
@deedcoin_club · 23,011
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
Листок бюрократической защиты информации
@bureaucraticsecurity · 19,134
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6” (@f6_cybersecurity), 22,363 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f6_cybersecurity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.