+108%: число высококритичных веб-атак выросло более чем вдвое За январь — сентябрь 2026 года Solar WAF зафиксировал 24,7 млн высококритичных атак на веб-ресурсы российских компаний. Годом ранее — 12,1 млн. Такие атаки могут привести к утечкам данных, проникновению в инфраструктуру и выполнению команд на сервере. Эксперты «Солара» связывают рост с применением ИИ-сканеров: они упрощают поиск уязвимостей и помогают м…

Channel
Солар
@solar_security
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,636subscribers
+105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001541351706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solar_security |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solar_security |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 20:57 | 6,636 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:47 | 6,639 | +6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:14 | 6,633 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 6,632 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 6,636 | +91 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 6,545 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 6,547 | +12 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 6,535 | +30 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 6,505 | +13 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 6,492 | +3 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 6,489 | +12 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 6,477 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 6,480 | -12 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 6,492 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 6,499 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 6,503 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 6,507 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 6,518 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 6,521 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 6,526 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.4%
- avg views ÷ 6,636 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,020
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (14 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 12,269 |
| Reactions total | 125 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 16:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
267 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 104 | 39.0% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 21.7% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 9.74% | |
| custom 5195001937967200137 | 25 | 9.36% | |
| 😎 | 15 | 5.62% | |
| 😐 | 10 | 3.75% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 3.37% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.375% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.375% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solar_security. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
От DNS до переписки: новые возможности защиты Собрали обновления и интеграции, которые расширяют возможности ИБ-команд. ☀️ Solar SIEM: ИИ помогает расследовать инциденты В версии 2026.3 появился ИИ-помощник, который анализирует результаты реагирования и предлагает дальнейшие шаги расследования. А мультитенантность позволяет работать с несколькими компаниями или филиалами в одной инсталляции, изолируя их данные. ☀️…
❤3
«Не делайте так никогда». Как уничтожить IT-инфраструктуру компании одним паролем 🔘 Каждый шестой киберинцидент в России связан с действиями сотрудников — случайными или умышленными. Достаточно одной неосторожной ошибки, чтобы открыть хакерам путь в корпоративную сеть. 9️⃣ Антон Ефимов, директор департамента архитектуры стратегических проектов ГК «Солар», рассказал о двух таких случаях в рамках форума «Цифровые реш…
❤10👍2🔥2
Как не превратить быстрый анализ в утечку конфиденциальных данных Сотруднику нужно быстро проанализировать договор. Он открывает внешний ИИ-сервис и собирается загрузить файл. Что должна проверить компания перед отправкой — и как контролировать обмен данными? Разбираем этот сценарий с учетом приказа ФСТЭК России № 117 и рекомендаций по защите информации при использовании ИИ. Показываем, какие задачи помогает решит…
❤5👍2💯1
Не нужно отказываться от новых технологий. Нужно уметь управлять рисками: контролировать доступ к данным, защищать инфраструктуру и вовремя выявлять угрозы. AI на вашей стороне, когда безопасность за «Соларом». ✅ Узнайте больше о нашем подходе AI First
🔥8❤3🎉1👀1
Договоры и код — в нейросети, корпоративные файлы — в доступе ИИ-агентов. Как сохранить контроль? Представляем Solar AI Firewall — специализированную систему для безопасного взаимодействия сотрудников, ИИ-агентов и приложений с внешними и внутренними ИИ-моделями. Проверяет запросы, передаваемые документы и ответы моделей, помогает защищать чувствительные данные и контролировать обращения сотрудников, приложений и И…
❤5🔥4custom 51950019379672001371
RestИИk by Solar — место встречи на SOC Forum 2026 ❤️ 27 и 28 октября подаем AI-технологии с характером в кластере «Ломоносов». Вот что вас ждет: ✅ Продуктовые корты: знакомьтесь с решениями «Солара» для защиты бизнеса от киберугроз. ✅ Два необычных выступления: шеф-повар Константин Опескин расскажет о гастрономии и ИИ, а судебно-медицинский эксперт Данила Мальцев — о криминалистике без высоких технологий. ✅ Кибе…
❤6custom 51950019379672001374🔥3
🔥 На SOC Forum спойлерят будущее Как будем работать, учиться и жить рядом с ИИ? 👀 Прямо сейчас на SOC Forum 2026 выступает Чэнь Цюфань — писатель и футуролог. В книге «ИИ 2041» он представил десять возможных сценариев будущего. Заглянем туда вместе? ➡️ Подключиться к трансляции
❤6🔥2custom 51950019379672001371
Распаковываем Solar JSOC: меньше рутины — больше защиты Как запустить мониторинг и реагирование без большой ИБ-команды? Чем отличаются JSOC One Start и Smart и как они помогают усилить защиту бизнеса? Разбираем облачную линейку сервисов на базе флагманского Solar JSOC. ☀️ Полная распаковка — в видео. А 27–28 октября приходите в специальную зону JSOC One в пространстве RestИИк by Solar на SOC Forum. Познакомим с се…
❤9custom 51950019379672001374🔥3😐1
Вы уверены, что Джима Кэрри не подменили? А Винисиуса Жуниора? А ваш сайт? Проверьте сами! Введите адрес в форму экспресс-проверки угроз и узнайте, есть ли в сети ресурсы с похожими доменами, публикации утечек аккаунтов или упоминания компании в даркнете. Если проверка покажет наличие угроз, можно обратиться к сервису Solar AURA. Он круглосуточно мониторит широкий спектр источников по всей сети, выявляет цифровые р…
❤8👍4🔥3😁1😎1
Оставьте фудкорты подросткам — собираемся в RestИИке 💅 Это мы про наше пространство для SOC Forum. В RestИИk by Solar вы сможете попробовать угощения и отдохнуть между активностями. А их будет много! ✅ Продуктовые корты — познакомьтесь с технологическими ИБ-решениями и загляните в специальную зону JSOC ONE. ✅ Киберчекап и интерактивы — проверьте данные на утечки, пройдите квест Solar 4RAYS, составьте учебное фишин…
❤5👍2😈2😐2
Российский Красный Крест усилил защиту персональных данных жертвователей и благополучателей с помощью DLP-системы Solar Dozor. 💡 Это новый этап сотрудничества с «Ростелекомом». После DDoS-атак на сайт Красного креста в 2024 году партнеры усилили защиту информационных ресурсов организации. Теперь Solar Dozor помогает защищать конфиденциальные данные и выявлять попытки их утечки в реальном времени. «Солар» адаптиров…
🔥7❤2custom 51950019379672001371
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @solar_security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
@Positive_Technologies · 29,449
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
@alukatsky · 38,431
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
@positivehackmedia · 30,043
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
@SecLabNews · 86,532
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@cyber_cabb · 81,673
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@rostelecomofficial · 23,372
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
@bureaucraticsecurity · 19,134
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Солар” (@solar_security), 6,636 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solar_security.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.