Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for YAH

Channel

YAH

@YAH_Channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,632subscribers

+108 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001358881130
TypeChannel
Username@YAH_Channel
DescriptionYet another hacker Я Егор Богомолов, с 2015 в кибербезе, основатель проектов Singleton Security и CyberEd. На канале разбираю новости из мира кибербезопасности через призму личного опыта, делюсь инсайтами, шучу шутки. Для связи - @bogomolove
Created28 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/YAH_Channel

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5247,6447,5846 August 2026 — 7,524 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,524 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,529 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,527 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,526 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,536 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,546 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,567 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,559 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,558 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,553 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,558 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,556 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,565 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,567 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,569 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,577 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,585 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,583 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,588 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,594 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,604 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,606 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,630 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,637 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,644 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,632 subscribers7,6326 August 20267 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net +108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,506–7,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 16:587,632-12
4 Nov 2026, 18:117,644+7
1 Nov 2026, 16:287,637+7
29 Oct 2026, 17:367,630+24
26 Oct 2026, 12:167,606+2
23 Oct 2026, 17:467,604+10
20 Oct 2026, 07:567,594+6
17 Oct 2026, 17:107,588+5
15 Oct 2026, 02:517,583-2
11 Oct 2026, 16:407,585+8
5 Oct 2026, 00:397,577+8
26 Sept 2026, 02:197,569+2
17 Sept 2026, 12:207,567+2
13 Sept 2026, 10:197,565+9
9 Sept 2026, 13:397,556-2
4 Sept 2026, 01:187,558+5
31 Aug 2026, 22:057,553-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:497,558-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:187,559-8
22 Aug 2026, 19:067,567first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 7,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.393%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held42 (26 May 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total19,865
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
291
Videos
21
Links
554

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

474 reactions across 36 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡11824.9%
❤9520.0%
🔥9219.4%
👍459.49%
💩326.75%
😁224.64%
custom 5362053342325385009153.16%
👎132.74%
❤‍🔥51.05%
💯40.844%
🤮40.844%
🤷‍♂40.844%
🍌30.633%
🎉30.633%
💊30.633%
🖕30.633%
🤣30.633%
👌20.422%
👏20.422%
🕊10.211%
5 further kinds51.05%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 474 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 42 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @YAH_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.76%
2 of 42 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
613
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,830
over 40 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvwcGu9128 August 202628 August 2026
2W5zFHwGNnd122 June 202622 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC945 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Вчера вышел офигенный подкаст 🎙 С Владимиром Дрюковым из Innostage проверили, что AI уже меняет в работе инженера по информационной безопасности (ИБ) и за что этому инженеру будут платить дальше. - Когда проще собрать свой инструмент с агентом, чем продлевать подписку на чужой софт. - Какие задачи в защите первыми уйдут к агентам и почему в расследованиях всё ещё важны опыт и контекст компании. - Зачем разбираться …

❤7👍2😱1

28 Oct 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,830 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Куда устраиваться в ИБ и как оставаться востребованным, когда на рынок пришёл ИИ Приходи на эфир про индустрию — вместе с Антоном Кузьминым, отраслевым техническим директором Positive Technologies, обсудим, как меняется рынок и какие навыки по работе с AI развивать, чтобы не остаться позади. Начало сегодня в 19:00 МСК, участие бесплатное. 👉 Ссылка на регистрацию 👉 Подключиться

28 Oct 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,530 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥5

28 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @forumsocVideo

38% обращений к публичным нейросетям содержали конфиденциальные данные Такие данные привел «Солар» за первое полугодие 2026 года. А еще — представил на SOC Forum Solar AI Firewall: шлюз безопасности для работы с внешними и внутренними ИИ-сервисами. Он проверяет запросы и ответы моделей, применяет политики ИБ и помогает выявлять атаки на ИИ-инфраструктуру. Что еще можно контролировать с его помощью: 📌 Доступ к моде…

28 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

SOC Forum 2026: ИИ перестал быть темой для слайдов Второй день на SOC Forum, и ловлю себя на мысли: впервые про AI на ИБ-конференции рассказывают в прошедшем времени. Что внедрили, где обожглись, сколько это стоило. Цифра для масштаба: в трек AI & Cybersecurity прилетело 126 заявок из 400+, в 2,5 раза больше прошлого года (данные оргкомитета). Качество докладов радует. Практика применения уже сформировалась, и люд…

26 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,200 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @sentra_teamPhoto

🟪-агенты ускоряют пентест, но сами могут стать точкой входа для атакующего. Максим Брагин, технический лидер и генеральный директор Sentra, выступит с докладом на SOC Forum, одном из крупнейших мероприятий в рамках Российской недели кибербезопасности. 28 октября 🟡11:00–11:30 | зал Архангельск “Ваш AI-пентестер теперь наш: практика атак на вайбхакинг-харнесы” Системы AI-пентеста дают агентам доступ к терминалу, сети…

❤1

26 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,130 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Ваш AI-хакер. Теперь наш. В среду на SOC Forum мой коллега покажет, как это делается 🤖 Максим Брагин, Sentra: "Ваш AI-пентестер теперь наш: практика атак на вайбхакинг-харнесы". 28 октября, 11:00, зал Архангельск. AI-пентестеру выдают терминал, сеть и учетки, а читает он код, файлы и ответы сервисов, которые контролирует цель. Один отравленный ответ - и агент работает на другую сторону с вашими же доступами. Макс п…

25 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

Завис на этом графике: https://craci.com/resources/CVE-publication-trends Гифка в тему... CRACI - финский стартап, который матчит SBOM против фида CVE под европейский Cyber Resilience Act. Ребята каждый день пересобирают статистику из официального cvelistV5, так что цифры не из пресс-релиза, а из первоисточника. Цифры За весь 2025 год вышло 47,8 тыс. CVE. Это уже было рекордом. В 2026 к 24 октября - 85,4 тыс. CR…

25 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,210 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Полностью согласен с популярным вариантом 😂 Те, кто хоть как-то пытается с этим справляться, идут по схеме "не можешь запретить - возглавь": раздают корпоративные харнессы (обертки над моделью с правилами и доступами), поднимают AI Hub с корпоративными скилами, запускают remote MCP с проверкой подписи - чтобы сервис можно было легально вывесить и легально же подключить. Но ничего из этого не мешает коллеге поднять …

custom 53620533423253850093❤1👎1🤮1

23 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,470 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Как ИБ узнает о новом вайбкод-сервисе коллег?

  1. До запуска, есть процесс ✅9%
  2. Из сканирования периметра 🔍10%
  3. Когда приходит счет за API 💸14%
  4. После инцидента 🙈67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣2👍1👎1🤮1custom 53620533423253850091

23 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,410 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

За последний год вайбкодинг тихо вышел за пределы разработки. Себе инструменты собирают аналитики, менеджеры, финансы 🧑‍💻 Обычно это выглядит безобидно: дашборд по продажам, бот для разбора заявок из почты, скрипт сверки с выгрузкой из 1С. Без ТЗ и ревью, зато работает, и коллеги просят доступ. Риск появляется в момент, когда такой инструмент начинают использовать всерьез. Сотрудник подключает его к CRM или 1С свои…

🔥3

21 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,720 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Про удары по ЦОДам Яндекса за две недели написали все. Мне интересно другое: а что в это время происходит у самих ЦОДов? Как реагируют операторы и что реально поменялось на рынке за эти 14 дней? Собрал топ-3 факта о происходящем: 1. Физика. Операторы модернизируют защиту внешнего инженерного оборудования и закупают средства против БПЛА. Требования расплывчатые, поэтому каждый делает по своему пониманию и бюджету. М…

❤7💩3👍1👎1💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @YAH_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@YAH_Channel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @YAH_Channel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTCAnonymous Poll275 voters

Как ИБ узнает о новом вайбкод-сервисе коллег?

  1. До запуска, есть процесс ✅9%
  2. Из сканирования периметра 🔍10%
  3. Когда приходит счет за API 💸14%
  4. После инцидента 🙈67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTCAnonymous Poll327 voters

Как вы думаете, сколько времени в день вам экономит AI?

  1. ⏱️ Меньше 30 минут9%
  2. 🕐 1-2 часа24%
  3. 🕒 3 часа и больше50%
  4. 📉 Скорее теряю на перепроверке17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTCAnonymous Poll230 voters

Опрос: с кем бы вы меньше всего хотели иметь дело?

  1. С вымогателями 😡29%
  2. Со следствием 👮🏻‍♂️71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTCAnonymous Quiz579 voters

Ты кто?

  1. Я только смотрю на кибербез со стороны17%
  2. Я тот самый Джун15%
  3. Я уже шарю в этой теме (2+ года опыта)19%
  4. Я Олд (5+ лет кушаю и не жалуюсь)22%
  5. Я банан26%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,043
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,728
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,449
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
КиберДед official
@deedcoin_club · 23,008
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
S.E.Reborn
@S_E_Reborn · 22,459
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,194
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Offensive Xwitter
@OffensiveTwitter · 21,323
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,021
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
IT и безопасность
@tg_security · 26,812
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,431
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
infosecurity
@tg_infosec · 26,845
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,748
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,889
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 63,401
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
The Bug Bounty Hunter
@thebugbountyhunter · 52,140
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
Этичный Хакер
@hack_less · 243,065
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
S.E.Book
@S_E_Book · 23,090
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Kaspersky
@kasperskylab_ru · 28,873
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YAH” (@YAH_Channel), 7,632 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YAH_Channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.