Channel
@ivf_rt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,423subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001684692400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ivf_rt |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ivf_rt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 1,423 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 1,422 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 1,422 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,702 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
30 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 36.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5220113606724557083 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 3.33% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 5 индустриальных задач Татарстана, которые ждут своих фаундеров В Татарстане сильная промышленная база, но у бизнеса остаются задачи, для которых пока не хватает готовых решений. Собрали пять направлений, где новые технологии могут стать основой для нового бизнеса. ◼️ Кадры для промышленности и инжиниринга Предприятиям нужны специалисты с конкретными производственными компетенциями. Возможность для HR-tech, EdTec…
📹 Несколько дней назад мы предложили вам представить себя инвестором. Сегодня раскрываем ответ. Это был Trigga 2.0 — AI-платформа для B2B-продаж, которая помогает находить ЛПР, формировать базу контактов и запускать персонализированный email-аутрич. ✈️ Команда выбрала путь универсального продукта. Вместо того чтобы сосредоточиться на одной нише, Trigga сделала ставку на широкий B2B-рынок: сервис подходит агентствам…
🇷🇺🇨🇳 Инвестиционное партнерство России и Китая: встречаемся на «РОСТКИ» 17 августа ИВФ РТ примет участие в форуме «РОСТКИ: Россия — Китай», где обсудим инвестиционные проекты с перспективой выхода на китайский рынок. 📍 МВЦ «Казань Экспо», зал 10 🕔 15:00–16:30 ▶️Поговорим о том, какие возможности открывает китайский рынок для российских технологических компаний, как инвесторам оценивать проекты с международным поте…
🌱 ИВФ РТ принял участие в форуме «БиоАгро 2026: Технологии будущего для сельского хозяйства России» В Москве обсудили, как биотехнологии меняют АПК и какие решения помогут российскому сельскому хозяйству двигаться к технологическому суверенитету. 🎙 Первый заместитель директора ИВФ РТ Азат Фазулов выступил в качестве спикера с темой «Агробиотехнопарки как новый формат внедрения практико-ориентированных технологий». …
🌐 Технологический дайджест: главное за июль Собрали несколько событий и цифр, которые характеризуют технологическую и венчурную повестку месяца. ◼️ Татарстан — в тройке инновационных регионов России Москва в девятый раз возглавила рейтинг инновационного развития субъектов РФ. В тройку лидеров также вошли Татарстан и Томская область. ◼️ Венчурный рынок стал осторожнее За первое полугодие 2026 года объём венчурных ин…
✈️ «Я выбираю небо!» — встречаемся в Казани 1 августа в Казани пройдёт авиационный фестиваль «Я выбираю небо!». Одной из площадок станет Технопарк «Идея», где гости смогут познакомиться с авиамоделированием и узнать больше о техническом творчестве. В программе: ▪️ автограф-сессия с Сергеем Богданом — Героем Российской Федерации, заслуженным лётчиком-испытателем; ▪️ бесплатные мастер-классы по сборке авиамоделей; ▪️…
Чем инновационный рынок Татарстана отличается от соседних регионов? 🚀 Когда говорят, что Татарстан — один из лидеров инновационного развития, за этим стоят вполне конкретные результаты. ◾️ Татарстан стабильно входит в число лидеров страны. По итогам 2025 года республика заняла 2-е место в рейтинге инновационного развития регионов России (НИУ ВШЭ). Особенно высоко эксперты оценили инновационную активность и качество…
🚀 Большие инновации редко начинаются с больших проектов. Чаще всего всё начинается с простой задачи внутри компании: сократить издержки, ускорить процесс, автоматизировать рутинную операцию или повысить качество работы. Дальше появляется пилот — небольшой эксперимент, который помогает проверить идею в реальных условиях. Если решение показывает результат, вокруг него формируется продуктовая команда, а затем оно масш…
Какой путь выбрали бы вы?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚀 Представьте стартап, который решил изменить рынок B2B-продаж. Команда создала ИИ-платформу, которая сама находит потенциальных клиентов, готовит персонализированные письма, запускает цепочки коммуникаций и помогает вести переписку с заказчиками. Идея простая: заменить сразу несколько сервисов одним инструментом. Продукт только выходит на рынок. Первые клиенты уже есть, но впереди главный вопрос — как масштабирова…
🚀 Команда ИВФ РТ приняла участие в стратегической сессии «Разумный венчур: от конкуренции к кооперации» , организованной ПАО «Газпром нефть» и экосистемой промышленных инноваций «Перспектива». Главная тема - как бизнесу, государству и стартапам эффективно кооперироваться для создания технологических лидеров. 🗣 Обсудили ключевые запросы компаний - проекты, которые помогут снизить издержки (в условиях ограничений на…
🚀 XXI Российский венчурный форум пройдёт в Казани 8–9 апреля 2027 года. Соответствующее распоряжение подписано Кабинетом Министров Республики Татарстан. Форум ежегодно объединяет стартапы, инвесторов, корпорации, институты развития и представителей органов власти, становясь одной из ключевых площадок для развития технологического предпринимательства в России. 💡 Для стартапов это возможность представить проект инв…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ivf_rt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой путь выбрали бы вы?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 58,631 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИВФ РТ” (@ivf_rt), 1,423 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivf_rt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.