International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,828–34,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:36
34,648
-18
8 Nov 2026, 14:54
34,666
-2
7 Nov 2026, 08:08
34,668
+13
6 Nov 2026, 09:49
34,655
+9
5 Nov 2026, 09:49
34,646
+104
4 Nov 2026, 08:29
34,542
+361
3 Nov 2026, 05:18
34,181
-14
2 Nov 2026, 08:20
34,195
-14
1 Nov 2026, 06:56
34,209
-16
31 Oct 2026, 06:00
34,225
-15
30 Oct 2026, 07:54
34,240
-13
29 Oct 2026, 09:39
34,253
-7
28 Oct 2026, 11:39
34,260
-14
27 Oct 2026, 08:59
34,274
-18
25 Oct 2026, 08:19
34,292
+13
24 Oct 2026, 06:07
34,279
-1
23 Oct 2026, 03:47
34,280
+30
22 Oct 2026, 00:17
34,250
+201
20 Oct 2026, 20:36
34,049
+257
19 Oct 2026, 16:11
33,792
first reading
Engagement
239 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 34,648 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,630
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 239 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
239 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
470,880
Reactions total
7,997
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,040
Videos
≈558
Links
≈3,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
48m 05s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 65 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,550 reactions across 238 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,075
41.7%
❤
3,922
14.8%
🔥
2,663
10.0%
🤔
2,481
9.34%
😁
1,593
6.00%
⚡
806
3.04%
🤣
763
2.87%
🤬
724
2.73%
🤡
685
2.58%
🙏
443
1.67%
🤓
332
1.25%
👏
325
1.22%
👎
247
0.93%
🤯
196
0.738%
😱
135
0.508%
🤮
71
0.267%
🕊
62
0.234%
😢
17
0.064%
😭
10
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 239 of the 239 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,608 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 239 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 239 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @parbut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 239 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (29.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Украина должна изменить административные границы областей, предлагают американские переговорщики. Косвенно эту идею уже подтвердил Трамп, заявив, что Украина по итогам войны «станет немного другой формы».
Ну как бы понятно, на что нацелены американцы — и волки сыты, и овцы целы. Но ведь совсем глупость получается. Одно дело — разыгрывать пропаганду, в которой Россия якобы действительно борется за территорию Украины …
Европейскую делегацию не пустили на переговоры в Абу-Даби. В зале только представители России, Украины и США. Явились англичане, немцы и французы, но их попросили удалиться.
Что ж, стоит зафиксировать красоту момента — на международной сцене сейчас ситуация, когда хохлов, которых, вообще-то, "забыли спросить", ценят и слушают больше, чем европейцев.
А мы еще ругаем криворожскую школу дипломатии, Украина теперь боле…
Скандал с главой Nvidia Дженсеном Хуангом сильно повлияет на расклад сил в технологической гонке ИИ между США и Китаем.
Хуанг уже вызван на ковер республиканскими конгрессменами на закрытый брифинг, чтобы оценить потенциальный ущерб технологической безопасности. Nvidia, на минуточку, является главным производителем чипов для ключевой ИИ-инфраструктуры США, в том числе и для компаний, напрямую взаимодействующих с Пен…
Ролик с пропагандой против допуска сборной России на чемпионат мира по хоккею.
А мы точно обидеться должны? Вышло-то довольно пророссийски, гордиться хочется.
Макс. TG.
Да, США в статусе внутренней холодной войны сами с собой. Белый дом контролирует Трамп, ему противостоят демократы с обеими палатами конгресса. Ключевая волна противостояния — контроль за внешней политикой.
И демократы, и трамповские республиканцы абсолютно верно полагают, что ключ к окончательной победе на выборах через 2 года будет у тех, кто сможет правильно выйти из сложной геополитической ситуации.
Переговоры …
Новая тактика ВС РФ против энергетики Украины — что изменилось?
Российские удары теперь чаще затрагивают не только объекты, производящие электричество, но и инфраструктуру, через которую оно поступает потребителям. Речь идет о смещении акцента с уничтожения электростанций на нарушение передачи и распределения электричества.
Идея довольно проста и элегантна — электричество может быть в энергосистеме, но вот доставит…
Стрелок из Кракова ожидаемо становится частью политической пропаганды. Сам он — классический "одинокий стрелок" с конкретной такой шизой. Психопатик будто бы вылез из этого вашего нижнего интернета — целое бинго юного террориста неомарксиста.
На его аккаунте обнаружили:
1) фотографии с флагом запрещённой в России организации ЛГБТ (поддержка меньшинств ради их превращения в революционный актив потом);
2) он высмеива…
Команду Трампа загоняют в угол
Чуть более полутора месяцев осталось до старта работы нового состава Конгресса США, а значит, что у Трампа осталось совсем немного времени на реализацию мирного плана по Украине, пока ему и его команде не начали заламывать руки.
В Палате представителей демократы уже нацелились на козла отпущения Хегсета
и прямо говорят об его импичменте за проведение Иранской операции. И, конечно, одн…
Киевляне выходят перекрывать дороги уже как минимум четвертый раз за последние дни. В Киеве критическая ситуация с электроэнергией, без света уже 3 дня.
На этом фоне традиционно разгорится главная баталия между Зеленским и Кличко. Зеленский будет выступать как военный правитель, Кличко — отстаивать гражданскую сферу. Традиционно будет передел ответственности, где каждый будет пытаться обвинить другого в неисполнении…
4 года назад удар ВС РФ по поселку Камышеваха вызвал бы международный скандал. Теперь же — пустота, за исключением дежурных эмигрантских СМИ, которые перепечатывают методички ВСУ.
И за это надо благодарить исключительно самих хохлов — за то, что открывают миру глаза на их тактику ведения войны. В начале СВО очень много было критики о том, почему ВС РФ бьет по школам. Знающие люди утверждали, что ВСУ сами используют …
Вчера состоялась встреча главы Высшего совета нацбезопасности Ирана Али Резаи и Путина, в ходе которой представитель Исламской Республики вручил президенту послание верховного лидера Хаменеи.
Тегеран держит руку на пульсе и наверняка хотел не только подтвердить дальнейшее военное сотрудничество, но и узнать позицию России по встрече спецпредставителя Дмитриева с Трампом и по всему переговорному треку украинского кон…
В отношении школ запрет пиццы — совершенно иной разговор. Одним из преимуществ российской и советской системы образования является горячее питание, которое в свое время заново ввел Владимир Путин.
Пицце не место в российских школах, заявила советник президента РФ Елена Ямпольская.
Что же выводит российское школьные завтраки и обеды на мировой уровень — его стремление к «здоровому питанию», или, как сейчас говорят — …
🤡69👍47❤5👏3🔥3🤔1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 239 posts we hold for @parbut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@parbut edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Чёрный Лебедь @swaneconomy · 140,991 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Дмитрий Никотин @dmitrynikotin · 695,868 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Парламент с Кнопкой” (@parbut), 34,648 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parbut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
