2 measurements taken within a single day, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211–245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:15
241
+26
12 Aug 2026, 03:01
215
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
263.0%
avg views ÷ 241 subscribers
Avg views / post
634
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
8 (11 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
3,803
Reactions total
82
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
65.9%
👍
24
29.3%
🕊
4
4.88%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Anthropic이 이제 클로드가 생성한 글에 사람 눈에는 보이지 않는 워터마크를 심기로 했습니다. 복사해 붙여넣거나 가볍게 손보는 정도로는 지워지지 않고, 이전 모델까지 순차적으로 도입된다고 합니다. 다만 많이 고쳐 쓰거나 번역을 거치면 신호가 옅어질 수 있다고 하네요.
작문의 과정을 즐기는 사람을 빼면, 이제 글쓰기는 뜻만 전달하면 되는 기능이 되어버린 것 같아 조금 안타깝습니다.
이 채널에 계신 분들은 학창 시절 내내 작문과 논술 교육을 받으며 스스로 글 쓰는 연습을 해오셨을 겁니다. 그런데 우리 자녀 세대는 스스로 글을 쓸 능력도, 그럴 기회도 점점 잃게 될 것 같아 마음이 쓰입니다.
제가 열다섯에 처음 교환학생으로 미국에 갔을 때가 떠오릅니다. 덧셈과 뺄셈을 하려고 계산기에 손을 뻗던 친구들이 꽤 많았는데요. 어릴 때부터 암산을…
알렉스님은 저에게 감사한 분입니다.
크립토 업계에서 좋은 사람을 만나 믿고 함께 일하기는 쉽지 않습니다. 포필러스 안팎의 동료들을 제외하고 업계에서 진심으로 믿고 즐겁게 교류하는 분을 꼽으라면, 저에게는 알렉스님입니다.
그와중에 작년에 아시아 기관들을 모아 올바른 방향으로 이끌고 싶다는 공통된 고민이 있었고, 좋은 타이밍에 알렉스님, 100y님을 비롯한 모예드, 동이, 스튜와 함께 ASA를 시작하게 되었습니다. 시장 상황과 무관하게 즐겁게 할 수 있는 것은 결국 함께하는 사람들 덕분인 것 같네요.
요즘은 저희 스티브님과 Face Podcast도 함께 하고 계십니다. 많은 관심 부탁드립니다!
https://x.com/face_east_
안녕하세요!
레이어제로의 아시아 총괄을 맡고 있는 알렉스입니다. 이번에 용기를 내어 저의 텔레그램 채널을 만들게 되었습니다.
저를 처음 뵙는 분들을 위해 간단히 소개드리자면, 저는 B2B 사업개발 업무를 좋아하고, 특히 블록체인 업계에 6년 넘게 있으면서 스테이블코인이 우리 삶에 가져다줄 기술적 혁신을 믿고, 이를 함께 만들어나가고 싶은 사람입니다. 제가 몸담고 있는 레이어제로, 그리고 아시아스테이블코인얼라이언스(ASA)를 통해 특히 아시아 금융권에 유의미한 변화를 만들고 싶습니다. 저의 장기적인 꿈은 교육혁신에 있습니다. 종국에는 학교를 세우고 새로운 시대에 맞는 교육을 디자인하는 꿈을 갖고 있습니다. 두 딸의 아빠로서 바람직한 아빠의 역할과 육아방식, 그리고 미래 아이들의 교육에 대해 고민하는 것을 좋아합니다.
이 채널을 만들게 된 …
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mosaicalex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 194,516 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“알렉스의 모자이크 🧩” (@mosaicalex), 241 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mosaicalex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.