ELON UNFOLLOWED LMAO

Channel
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,621subscribers
-6,086 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001225991487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bagcalls |
| Description | The OG of OGs. X: https://x.com/Bagcalls TG: @bitbaggerr DOUBLE TRIPLE CHECK Main - @Bagcalls Gambles - @Bagscasino BD: @Humanjoe https://pump.fun/u/bagcalls https://proxima.tools/@bags |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bagcalls |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 53,621 | -889 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 54,510 | -1,945 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:51 | 56,455 | -638 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:38 | 57,093 | -153 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:15 | 57,246 | -642 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:56 | 57,888 | -545 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:38 | 58,433 | -202 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:38 | 58,635 | +6,395 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 52,240 | -989 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:48 | 53,229 | -663 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 53,892 | -1,612 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 55,504 | -1,307 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 56,811 | -1,766 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 58,577 | -176 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 58,753 | -635 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 59,388 | -152 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 59,540 | -267 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 59,807 | -810 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 60,617 | +6,523 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:35 | 54,094 | first reading |
Engagement
707 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.86%
- avg views ÷ 53,621 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,540
- 194 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 194
- of 707 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 707 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 297,884 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,050
- Videos
- ≈1,100
- Links
- ≈20,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 194 posts held from the last 30 days (1.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
HE LOCKED LMAO https://solscan.io/tx/4DuhRGfXU1NNXTemzCr2BuMqWahfqSVMp8Mp5im2zLdYgyxp8Tap24SVtvrMMVKX9ZPB1Nmmio428pSmWSgsyu4G
https://x.com/ChainChomp131/status/2120629501805961561
God bless this kid
I'm literally up genny
Oh my god
I give it a 90% cahnce of being a hack but fuck it
Holy shit did I just ape Elon son's coin
10 free combos on Totalis https://totalis.trade/r/bagcalls Meaning u get to make a 5-leg combo and they will pay you if it his for free They hooked this up for us so enjoy fam
$NEBULA Hype NFT platform very early and good mc 0x8007567d13f61c81caf5ea6af38c187d02699122 https://x.com/pairnebula Pair any collection with RWAs, stocks or Elysium coins Leverage from 1x to 50x, so the mint price moves with it Coin + NFT launches where holders earn 25% of every mint Bridge in from 50+ chains
https://x.com/bagcalls/status/2120524100686729372
Already buying the next Argus Volta Elysium hype should be done this year
Showing the 12 most recent of 707 posts we hold for @bagcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @bagcalls as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 5 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 25 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bagscasino · 2,64120 postsTreasure Hoard Announcements
@TreasureHoardAnnouncements · 42 postsALL CALL CHANNELS
@allcallchannels · 32 postsBitcoinEthereumTetherXRPCardanoDogeCoinSolanaTron - $BIGCOIN
@BigcoinERC20 · 91 postCHEDDAR BOB 100X CALLS
@CHEDDARBOBCALLS · 11 postElon's 420 Calls
@Elons420calls · 11 postG O R O N
@GORON_erc20 · 251 postHoodie Cat
@HoodieCatCoin · 891 postInfluencer Post Alert [Free Version]
@InfluencerPostAlert · 3,2671 postPEPE CLASSIC
@PEPECLASSIC_ERC20 · 71 postPepe❤️PEPSI - $PEPSI
@PEPSI_erc20 · 161 postQuality Control
@QualityC0ntrol · 1191 postREFUND $RFD
@RFD_ERC20 · 751 postTheCatWorld Official Announcement
@TheCatWorldAnn · 311 postThe Den
@TheSamuraiDen · 291 postᘔOGGEᗪ ᑭEᑭE ($ZEPE)
@ZEPE_erc20 · 151 postGEMS LORD
@gemslordcom · 21 postMiniDraft Alpha
@minidraftgamble · 29,4071 postCalls baby
@skylarscalls · 731 postSGE NEWS
@sogefinancenews · 1281 postSAJA - spanish community
@tctspanish · 31 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CallAnalyser · 50,31434 postsiToken Locked - Ethereum
@iTokenLockedEthereum · 6,22023 posts@callers
@presales · 62318 postsCall Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,0679 postsiToken - Ethereum
@iTokenEthereum · 15,5478 postsiToken Verified - Ethereum
@iTokenVerifiedEthereum · 8235 postsФильтр
@asdfsdafa2 · 14 postsSpyDefi
@spydefi · 41,8684 postsbooferyfloo
@booferyfloo · 13 postsjunction_output
@junctionoutput · 13 postsBags Casino 🎒🎒🎒🎲
@bagscasino · 2,6412 posts测试用转发
@ceshiyongzhuanfa · 12 postsTrav’s Diary
@DiaryOfTrav · 12,2992 postsjunction_output_birdman
@junctionoutputbirdman · 12 postsProtoVerse News
@News_PVR · 3452 postsTravladd Crypto Hub
@travladdcryptoinvesting · 7,4612 postsVaultboy Degen Calls
@vaultboydegencalls · 582 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 16,1712 posts🔆BSC CALLERS LIST🔆
@bsccallerlist · 21 postCall Analyser (BASE only)
@CallAnalyserBase · 5,3251 postCall Analyser (TRX only)
@CallAnalyserTRX · 4,1321 post🔆ERC CALLERS LIST 🔆
@erccallerlist · 21 postSpyDefi Hub
@SpyDefiHub · 1,2721 postThunders Marketing (Web3)🌛
@thundersmarketing · 7561 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bagscasino · 2,64112 postsSpyDefi
@spydefi · 41,8687 postsSpyDefi Live
@SpyDefiLive · 1,9112 postsdreamcoinclub
@dreamcoinclub · 31 postTEST CHANNEL
@hookah · 1,7671 postRobin the Frog
@robincoinrbh · 2,7121 post$SWAPPY Portal
@swappyportal · 1,4121 postTrench with Trav
@trenchwithtrav · 6,4891 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PowsGemCalls · 111,030#1
@x666calls · 17,561#2
@Maestrosdegen · 35,456#3
@ryoshigamble · 36,545#4
@mad_apes_call · 78,667#5
@maythouscalls · 35,084#6
@maythousdegens · 15,250#7
@senzu_calls · 6,601#8
@watisdes · 29,838#9
@venomcalls · 34,692#10
@printspress · 18,774#11
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,765#12
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,580#13
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,000#14
@DreamCalls100x · 11,654#15
@GemsofRa · 17,601#16
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,662#17
@sugarydick · 33,013#18
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,694#19
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,776#20
@NeoCallss · 17,514#21
@AnimeGems · 9,605#22
@TBGgambLes · 5,565#23
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,767#24
@Archerrgambles · 5,588#25
@chiggajogambles · 8,837#26
@gubbinscalls · 25,777#27
@TheDonsCalls · 12,350#28
@senzugambles · 1,827#29
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 24,158#30
@ETHTRENDING · 41,763#31
@ASTRAL_GAMBLES · 3,568#32
@Acidonmeliketheraincalls · 3,334#33
@thecallercrosschain · 7,921#34
@walloftrophies · 16,171#35
@crypt0coc0 · 7,378#36
@thecasinoeye · 6,319#37
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,888#38
@eyecrosschain · 12,129#39
@lucasapeeth · 3,096#40
@TERPS_X100_CALLS · 3,250#41
@HardSnipe · 11,639#42
@brozinkers · 52,224#43
@primegems · 18,558#44
@eezzyjournal · 40,047#45
@cryptopunters · 2,292 (as read 22 August 2026)#46
@GabbensCalls · 10,812#47
@FrenzGems · 4,975#48
@BasedLaunches · 3,731#49
@TheBlockchainGods · 6,482#50
@mad_apes_gambles · 98,187#51
@arcanegems · 46,632#52
@DegenSeals · 34,123#53
@TheReaperGems · 14,045#54
@SapphireCalls · 12,102#55
@spydefi · 41,868#56
@TheIllestShills · 5,009#57
@kobesgambles · 15,696#58
@degensgems · 14,854#59
@diaryofapes · 4,572#60
@MarkDegens · 23,173#61
@WatcherGuru · 632,776#62
@kvontrades · 3,500#63
@Luffysgemcalls · 10,865#64
@spidersjournal · 32,484#65
@engineercalls · 7,295#66
@michacalls · 7,856#67
@JulzLabs · 4,628#68
@NFG_GAMBLES · 4,180#69
@trendingssol · 132,162#70
@CraftyGambles · 10,869#71
@MultiChain1000x · 9,358#72
@jamiescave · 13,270#73
@DoxxedChannel · 17,094#74
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,067#75
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,171#76
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,296#77
@GenesisChain_Calls · 14,207#78
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,667#79
@KobesCalls · 17,530#80
@iTokenEthereum · 15,547#81
@waldosalpha · 4,948#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@brookcalls · 29,674
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@LionCALL · 68,066
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@MaybachCalls · 31,365
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@cryptogems555 · 23,504
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
@LionJUNGLE · 23,168
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
@mad_apes_call · 78,667
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@batman_gem · 18,875
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
@dr_crypto_channel · 17,301
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
@EZMoneyCalls · 22,872
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@ETHTRENDING · 41,763
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@Maestrosdegen · 35,456
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@maythouscalls · 35,084
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@ryoshigamble · 36,545
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,067
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@veigarcalls · 24,799
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
@dogendojo · 27,113
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@gogetacalls · 61,941
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
@venomcalls · 34,692
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@Crypto_KingCall · 150,286
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@MarkDegens · 23,173
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@trendingssol · 132,162
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@mad_apes_gambles · 98,187
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@ChinapumpWXC · 109,052
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,123
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒” (@bagcalls), 53,621 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bagcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.