Channel
@hockscalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
968subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001883720132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hockscalls |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hockscalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 968 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 968 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 40.0% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 20.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We’re about to walk into the most abundant, balanced, wealthy, and successful period of our lives. We naturally attract good fortune, and we are wealthy in more ways than one. We give ourselves permission to prosper, and we have the power to build the lives that we desire. Bullieve
❤🔥3
Signed Pauuu $USDT
I can feel we are near the bottom.
❤1
Signed Pauuu $USDT
I made a plan, and i didnt follow hahaha. Well now lets grind back since its bear.
❤1👍1
Signed Pauuu $USDT
This is insane! Instead of taking profits after the $ETH pump, this #BitcoinOG(1011short) doubled down on his long — now holding 85,001 $ETH($280M) with over $16M in unrealized gains. https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1998421812305363024
Signed Pauuu $USDT
Eth looking bullish. Hope onchain follows
Signed Pauuu $USDT
JUST IN: $155,000,000 worth of crypto shorts liquidated in the past 60 minutes. @WatcherGuru
Signed Pauuu $USDT
Gas fees on eth is very low now https://x.com/etherscan/status/1996336953781031338?s=46&t=Vy6qoWSnWc6RmTvOfDVwqA
Signed Pauuu $USDT
https://x.com/ethereum/status/1996226190399455358?s=46&t=Vy6qoWSnWc6RmTvOfDVwqA
Signed Pauuu $USDT
Take a look at the old og memes in $ETH folks. Not just recovering but also performing really well. If it continues we might be busy again 🙂
🥰1😍1
Signed Pauuu $USDT
Perma bear now bullish short term, lfg!
Signed Pauuu $USDT
https://x.com/cryptocapo_/status/1995853682190287140?s=46&t=Vy6qoWSnWc6RmTvOfDVwqA
Signed Pauuu $USDT
I AM ABOUT TO WALK INTO THE MOST ABUNDANT BALANCED WEALTHY AND SUCCESSFUL PERIOD OF MY LIFE. I NATURALLY ATTRACT GOOD FORTUNE, AND I AM WEALTHY IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE. I GIVE MYSELF PERMISSION TO PROSPER, AND I HAVE THE POWER TO BUILD THE LIFE THAT I DESIRE.
❤6🏆1👏1
Signed Pauuu $USDT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hockscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 525,598 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hocks Journal” (@hockscalls), 968 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hockscalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.