Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝

@J7tradingjournal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,513subscribers

+1,262 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001732578503
TypeChannel
Username@J7tradingjournal
DescriptionI share some of the stuff I buy DM @J777OTC for any enquiries
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/J7tradingjournal

Growth

16,25117,51316,8827 August 2026 — 16,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,251 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,787 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,119 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,002 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,324 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,053 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,115 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,513 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,062–17,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:2417,513+398
13 Aug 2026, 04:0817,115+62
12 Aug 2026, 03:0517,053-271
11 Aug 2026, 03:3517,324+322
10 Aug 2026, 04:2017,002-117
9 Aug 2026, 06:4117,119+332
8 Aug 2026, 04:1816,787+536
7 Aug 2026, 10:4516,251no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3716,251first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 17,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,130
116 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.968%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 116 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held116 (6 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total363,630
Reactions total2,258
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,870
Videos
202
Links
2,940

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,258 reactions across 75 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,258100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,258reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 14 August 2026

To add you guys think crime only happens in BNB wait till you see Solana foundations money Imo it’s became a really big problem for SOL eco since RH came and STONK is their calling for market share from them so I believe wen the time is right the crime will happen I’m all hands on deck for the moment

14 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://x.com/solana/status/2088314091144433797 Solana keeps giving hints and people still don’t understand how huge is this Just wait till the mass integration happens

14 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈2,860 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Closed $AI here was a solid trade I held all the way down and back up was a hella of a ride But with cashcat looking shakey I hope to re-enter sub 10m ranges again Trade on fomo with me and follow me there https://fomo.family/r/J777Crypto

7

14 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈2,720 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

1

14 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,210 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://x.com/blknoiz06/status/2088234194929357009?s=46&t=G-f7PWqROgW5EdxDP3hoDA

14 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,040 viewsread 14 August 2026

Looks like it’s kicking in for $VIBE just broke ATH’s

14 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,860 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: Conviction! 👩‍🎓 @J7tradingjournal had the conviction to call Fren Pet at a higher marketcap and it just hit x2+. $1.5M ➡️ $3.8M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔹 FWA - TRENDING #2

13 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈3,760 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

If you read properly they basically have so many connects from Solana and Solana itself also RT-ed about them If Solana foundation does pick this up and shill it and don’t take stonk as their RWA play to compete with RH then idk what is I keep telling everyone around me this is the easiest layup I’ve seen in a long time compared to cashcat If you don’t understand, you soon will https://x.com/launchonsf/status/208

1

13 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,010 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @sugarydickPhoto

Balls tingling All in on crime Hearing saylor is gonna rotate his $BTC to $BTC to earn more interest in $BTC

13 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈4,310 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Idk some peeps still don’t understand how huge is stonk it’s literally a billion dollar protocol larping at 11m I’ll just simply stack more

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @J7tradingjournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 87,877 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝” (@J7tradingjournal), 17,513 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/J7tradingjournal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.