Channel
@SaiCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,996subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001603996487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SaiCalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SaiCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 2,996 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 2,998 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 2,996 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
221 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 33.5% | |
| custom 5864027176893943469 | 44 | 19.9% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 19.9% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 6.33% | |
| 🏆 | 10 | 4.52% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 4.07% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 2.71% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.71% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 2.71% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 2.26% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 1.36% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SaiCalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 January 2025 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
July rally is here! Well, I am up a decent amount already. But yea i deployed only 46% of my stables instead of my original 60% target before July rally. I'm waiting for a local top to take some quick profits however just for the sake of it 😂 October and November will be the real test. Either we get a higher low, or we get the painful 40K to 50K bottom. If you are mentally stuck waiting for the absolute bottom ever…
❤8
We are close. I am out but once I'm home, time to get ledger out and go atleast 50-60% in during this dump. July will be green. I am hoping October/November is higher low but who knows what will happen by then. 😶
👍7❤5custom 58640271768939434693
Potential bottom of this bear in June/Early July OR October/November according to most TA Experts. Historically, most bear phases last around 20–25 weeks from the ATH. We are currently in week 17. That said, I am not overly concerned with pinpointing the exact bottom, these prices are good if you can hold long term. I swung my previous entries on the rally and now looking to size in again. Maybe 60% of stables in du…
👍10❤4🔥1
Deployed 10% stables in at these prices. Will ape the rest over the next few months. Back in the day I used to panic at these moments, not anymore. Just remember, all these prices are free if you can hold for the next 3-4 years. Same shit all over again. PS: 20% in now
❤13
Holding that line for a month and a half. Didn’t catch the precise top ofcourse, but exited roughly 80–90% of ATH prices. BNB and ETH were the main errors. Fumbled m's coz of latter. No regrets now. Plan is simple now: sit tight until mid-2026, rotate out of stables, stake, and step away from the space.
🏆10👍7❤5
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 58640271768939434698👏5😡5😱1
34% tethered for now. Will gradually exit upto 80% by August-September. Hoping for last 15-20% push here in coming months. Not being a moonboy. Once bear starts in 2026, will start accumulating BTC only on SPOT again. (65-75k) I wonder how many people will retire by end of this year or will they stay addicted to this life. Not sure about me.
❤27🔥5
🫥
custom 586402717689394346910
Well at this point, i am accepting my L strategy this bullrun and will just long term hold everything until next. Stabled only 25% and that too invested more than half of it back in the dump just to go more lower. Retirement funds delayed by 4 years. 😢 Saw this trash somewhere, if it happens, i am stabling all: https://x.com/intocryptoverse/status/1905495819593093134
custom 58640271768939434698
4107 ATH This was a bit off, everyone had too much hopium lol. Totally ruined here as well.
custom 58640271768939434697
109k ATH.. was right and still messed it up and didn't sell 😂
custom 58640271768939434695
Plan failed 🤕
😱8❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SaiCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 728,513 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SaiCalls” (@SaiCalls), 2,996 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaiCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.