Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,492–20,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:17
20,552
+11
17 Sept 2026, 08:56
20,541
+3
15 Sept 2026, 06:21
20,538
-6
13 Sept 2026, 15:59
20,544
+3
11 Sept 2026, 17:37
20,541
-24
9 Sept 2026, 06:15
20,565
+17
5 Sept 2026, 21:36
20,548
+7
3 Sept 2026, 16:17
20,541
-1
2 Sept 2026, 08:06
20,542
+2
1 Sept 2026, 10:56
20,540
+9
31 Aug 2026, 11:44
20,531
+7
30 Aug 2026, 12:58
20,524
+19
29 Aug 2026, 12:25
20,505
+2
28 Aug 2026, 14:36
20,503
-10
27 Aug 2026, 12:34
20,513
-8
25 Aug 2026, 15:12
20,521
-4
24 Aug 2026, 14:13
20,525
-13
22 Aug 2026, 20:29
20,538
+35
21 Aug 2026, 09:57
20,503
+1
20 Aug 2026, 09:48
20,502
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 20,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,460
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
60 (23 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
40,160
Reactions total
1,411
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 35s
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,735 reactions across 45 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,748
40.5%
🔥
2,414
20.6%
💯
1,766
15.0%
👍
1,140
9.71%
❤🔥
417
3.55%
👏
242
2.06%
😱
163
1.39%
😁
159
1.35%
🙈
113
0.963%
💔
107
0.912%
😢
69
0.588%
👌
61
0.52%
💘
56
0.477%
😍
54
0.46%
💋
41
0.349%
🤯
33
0.281%
😭
24
0.205%
🤗
20
0.17%
🤔
15
0.128%
💊
14
0.119%
14 further kinds
79
0.673%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,735 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть ловушка, в которую, даже если почитать ваши комментарии тут или в Инстаграм вы попадаете все.Вот вообще все.
Само словосочетание «хороший мужчина» у вас ассоциируется не с
•умный,
•чувствующий,
•с чувством юмора, •ответственный, •внимательный,
•адекватный,
•состоявшийся,
•честный,
•смелый,
•амбициозный, •великодушный,
•тактичный
•с силой воли
(что вообще-то и есть показали «хорошести»)
А со словами
унылый, нев…
Плохая новость: если вы хоть раз побывали в отношениях с эмоциональными качелями- вас будет туда тянуть, даже если вам не понравилось.
Это как с индейцами и «огненной водой» (ромом): им хватало одного стакана, чтобы превратиться в законченных алкоголиков. То же самое и с нашей психикой : даже одноразовый контакт с эмоциональными качелямм делает нормальное скучным.
Почему? Потому что дофамин.
Так вот, про выбор мужч…
Дорогие те, у кого уже есть билет - дойдите, пожалуйста, до закрытого канала🙏🏻
Для тех, у кого билетов ещё нет - их можно купить вот здесь до 12:00
Если вы чего-то не понимаете, или что-то не получается и вы не знаете, куда идти и нажимать - ссылка на техподдержку в первом комментарии 💋
Любое долгосрочное планирование всегда и без исключений- не планирование, а трёп.
Любое «как-нибудь» - это всегда «никогда»
Да, разумеется, вам могут наврать с три короба и с точными сроками и датами, но когда это общие слова и «конда-нибудь» - это вообще нельзя рассматривать ни как правду, ни как истину, ни как обещание.
«Мы с тобой как-нибудь съездим на море»,
«Париж прекрасен осенью, тебе обязательно нужно …
Дамы и котики, настал тот момент, когда мне очень-очень нужна ваша помощь.
Может быть вы, или ваши близкие/близкие друзья работают в системе среднего образования.
Директорами московских или подмосковных школ, или завучами.
Мне очень -очень нужна ваша помощь и ваши контакты:
мой прекрасный сын хочет поступать со второго курса колледжа в институт, но это не возможно сделать без школьного аттестата.
ЕГЭ сдать он может…
Романтическая история с розовыми флагами и без счастливого конца. Хотя кто знает?
Сегодня в 20:00, дамы и котики.
да, запись будет - запись это сейчас проще, чем гарантировать, что на эфире будет звук 😭
Девочки (и мальчики) мне очень приятно, что вы за меня горой (правда!) но хейта много всегда, и дело вовсе не в нём.
Я писала пост про другое.
Про правила жизни, так сказать….
❤206👍67👏16💯15🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @tania_govorit_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Канал Елизаветы Устюговой @ElizavetaUstyugova · 25,222 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
МАРИЯ ЛОГВИНОВА | Радикальная женственность @Marialogvinovaofficial · 31,215 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Ярослав Самойлов | Канал @yaroslav_samoylov · 41,827 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Записки Василиски @vasilisa_delicia · 24,006 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
INNA DE ALMEIDA @inna_de_almeida · 61,358 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Екатерина Любимова ♥️ @lubimova_kate · 33,827 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Психолог Александр Шахов @alex_shahov_fg · 34,096 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Записки какого-то мужика @zapiski_man3 · 31,606 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Бачинская @bachinskaya_oxana · 69,728 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Модная истерика @fashionisterika · 110,038 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
O svidaniyah 🖤 @o_svidaniyah_tg · 28,194 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Инна Белова @belovainnapsy · 79,073 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Артем Репецкий @artemrepetskyi · 25,425 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Психолог Сексолог МАКС БЛЭК @m_sovetnik · 59,602 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Психолог Марк Бартон @markbarton_mb · 88,659 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TANIA_GOVORIT” (@tania_govorit_channel), 20,552 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tania_govorit_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.