Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Плавучая редакция

Channel

Плавучая редакция

@editboat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,546subscribers

-248 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001126630993
TypeChannel
Username@editboat
DescriptionЗаметки UX-редактора Вовы Лалоша. Советы по интерфейсным текстам и редактуре, примеры, фейлы, контент-гайды. Вопросы, предложка: @editboat_bot Cотрудничество: @maratele Потыкать: #совет #ответ #разбор https://lalosh.taplink.ws в реестре clck.ru/3FfHCr
Created28 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/editboat

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,53212,79412,66312,5466 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net -248. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,493–12,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:1012,546-5
7 Nov 2026, 22:5012,551+6
6 Nov 2026, 21:3212,545-1
5 Nov 2026, 21:4612,546-3
4 Nov 2026, 23:2812,549+3
4 Nov 2026, 02:2112,546+14
3 Nov 2026, 03:0512,532-6
2 Nov 2026, 06:0812,538-3
1 Nov 2026, 07:1412,541-3
31 Oct 2026, 05:1912,544-5
30 Oct 2026, 08:4912,549-4
29 Oct 2026, 06:4612,553-4
26 Oct 2026, 22:5512,557-6
25 Oct 2026, 02:0812,563-6
24 Oct 2026, 00:0612,569-5
23 Oct 2026, 02:5612,574-4
22 Oct 2026, 03:0712,578-7
20 Oct 2026, 21:2012,585-5
19 Oct 2026, 16:5012,590+1
18 Oct 2026, 16:4812,589first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 12,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held43 (2 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total8,020
Reactions total174
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 09:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈44
Links
≈399

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,221 reactions across 43 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤94242.4%
😁68831.0%
👍1486.66%
🔥853.83%
💯693.11%
🤣632.84%
🤯632.84%
❤‍🔥361.62%
🤔341.53%
✍130.585%
💘130.585%
🥰120.54%
🤝100.45%
👻60.27%
😢60.27%
🫡60.27%
👾50.225%
🤗50.225%
👎30.135%
😍30.135%
6 further kinds110.495%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @editboat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.33%
1 of 43 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,320
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,970
over 42 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vfnxvw2KW312 July 20262 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,100 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Так карта бесплатная? Или за 1 ₽? Или это товары за 1 ₽? Что-то как-то сложно прям. спасибо за скрин Полине

🤯33👍3

23 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,970 views42 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Бывало и смешнее Но ничего — скоро ребята подключат клод! Вот заживём тогда, насмотримся с вами шуточек. #пятничное прислал Виталий

😁37👻3🤣2

22 Oct 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,780 views26 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Опасаться, тревожиться → бояться #микросовет Почему? Просто это слабые и уклончивые глаголы. Да, может быть они помогают точнее показать выраженность страха в серьёзной прозе. Но в разговоре мы почти всегда возьмём более простой и бинарный вариант «боюсь — не боюсь», независимо от уровня угрозы. Мы одинаково скажем: боюсь древнего хтонического бога, непостижимого человеческому разуму и боюсь опоздать на работу. …

❤17👍7👾2

20 Oct 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,670 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Автоматическое пополнение глоссария #микросовет Нашёл для себя ещё один интересный способ использования памяти агента. Теперь он ищет в наших чатах с ботом термины, названия и прочие частые выражения — чтобы раз в неделю складывать их в корпоративный глоссарий или предлагать как примеры для ToV. Обычно это делается ручками, но можно что-то пропустить. А раз все тексты так или иначе прогоняются через LLM, то почему…

❤15👍5

18 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,500 views50 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Ночью в холодильнике Не понял, а почему в холодильнике должно быть пусто ночью? Разве холодильник как раз не придумали, чтобы ночью продукты не портились? А куда жать, чтобы добавить что-то вкусное? Так много вопросов, так мало ответов. спасибо Татьяне за скрин

😁41❤9

12 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,930 views24 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Свой личный → свой #микросовет «Свой» и «личный» — практически синонимы. Лучше оставить что-то одно: Вы можете удалить свои личные данные в любой момент ↓ Вы можете удалить свои данные в любой момент Есть другой вариант: Вы можете удалить личные данные в любой момент Но важен контекст. Если бы на экране кроме личных упоминались ещё и данные членов семьи, то фразу можно было бы понять неправильно: удалить личные д…

❤14👍9👾1

9 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,800 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Привет, ты! Где-то на холоде, одинокий, стареющий, ты слышишь меня? за #пятничное спасибо Маше

😁31❤4🙈1

8 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,920 views62 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Пляшем от радости Не знаю, как относиться к этому сообщению. С одной стороны, явно кто-то ошибочно увидел в экране успеха свой звёздный час (порядочные люди для этого заводят телеграм-канал). С другой стороны — это мягкие игрушки. И подписчик Игорь, приславший скрин, не так уж неправ в том, что в мире мягких игрушек все средства хороши. Поэтому давайте зачморим их только за «Вам» с большой буквы.

😁59👻2🎃1

7 Oct 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,950 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Ловушка вайбкодинга Кажется, у нас появился ещё один рабочий скилл, который нельзя игнорировать. Я долго пытался его не замечать, но вайбкодинг в итоге пришёл ко мне сам — позвали на мини-курс Boost от Школы Вани Замесина. На второй день курса мы уже вовсю фигачили свои проекты: калькуляторы ипотеки, тесты, учебные платформы и даже раскладки таро, прости господи. Вайбкод-эксперты же были рядом и отвечали на бесконе…

❤10🔥7👎1🤩1

6 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,680 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Удачное время #мысливслух Большая удача, конечно, участвовать во всей этой нейродвижухе с рабочими задачами, на которых можно все эти новинки испытывать. Представьте сейчас взять саббатикал? Возвращаешься на работу через год, а коллеги уже силой мысли контент редактируют 😵‍💫

😁43💯4🔥2❤1🎃1😐1

1 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,390 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Самоирония 500-го уровня Приложение Acctual пишет: Что-то пошло не так: Возможно, мы не оплатили счёт... Но главная ирония в том, что это приложение для... создания и оплаты счетов! 😅

😁38❤10❤‍🔥4

29 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,970 views30 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Сохранять примеры #совет из старого фонда Примеры — самая трудоёмкая часть любой презентации, гайда, портфолио или статьи. Всё остальное можно как-то доработать, придумать, изучить. Примеры — нет. Это как невосполнимые организмом витамины. Отсюда простой вывод: видите что-то хоть немного интересное в рабочем проекте, чужом приложении, просто в телеге — сохраните себе в папочку. Можно даже без какой-то специальной …

❤26🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @editboat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @editboat as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,474
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,201
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,195
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,912
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 19,986
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Записки редакторки
@zapiski_redaktorki · 93,608
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,403
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,076
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,003
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Паша и его прокрастинация
@abbsol · 29,402
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,316
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 42,695
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,268
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,102
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 104,828
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,384
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Грамотность на «Меле»
@gramota_mel · 20,075
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 62,857
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,709
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
The Content is The Queen
@thecontentisthequeen · 21,451
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Редакция Рыба
@ryba_team · 20,254
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 September 2026
Вредный корректор
@julia_v_redcor · 19,953
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Работа в медиапроектах Т-Банка
@tj_collega · 31,955
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
Это работа для редактора
@glvrd_job · 22,905
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Плавучая редакция” (@editboat), 12,546 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editboat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.