Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Золотые пуши

Channel

Золотые пуши

@goldpush

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,155subscribers

+55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735724681
TypeChannel
Username@goldpush
DescriptionЛучшие (и не только) пуши мира, для вдохновения, красоты и насмотренности Мы запатентовали слово Пушолог По рекламе и вопросам: @maxnatty РКН — https://clck.ru/3FtPPG
Created27 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/goldpush

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,07614,16414,1206 August 2026 — 14,100 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,100 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,097 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,096 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,095 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,089 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,088 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,081 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,083 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,090 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,087 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,092 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,093 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,091 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,086 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,084 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,089 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,087 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,085 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,076 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,081 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,091 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,089 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,086 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,077 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,079 subscribers1 October 2026 — 14,117 subscribers6 October 2026 — 14,138 subscribers10 October 2026 — 14,149 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,148 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,152 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,151 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,144 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,138 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,139 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,148 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,146 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,151 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,152 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,155 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,160 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,152 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,154 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,158 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,159 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,163 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,164 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,160 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,159 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,158 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,156 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,157 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,154 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,155 subscribers14,1556 August 20269 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,063–14,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:2014,155+1
7 Nov 2026, 08:5614,154-3
6 Nov 2026, 11:5614,157+1
5 Nov 2026, 13:5614,156-2
4 Nov 2026, 17:1514,158-1
3 Nov 2026, 15:3614,159-1
2 Nov 2026, 18:5514,160-4
1 Nov 2026, 21:3014,164+1
31 Oct 2026, 18:4014,163+4
30 Oct 2026, 19:4914,159+1
29 Oct 2026, 22:3714,158+4
28 Oct 2026, 20:1814,154+2
27 Oct 2026, 17:0514,152-8
26 Oct 2026, 15:5614,160+5
25 Oct 2026, 18:0914,155+3
24 Oct 2026, 18:4714,152+1
23 Oct 2026, 19:3714,151+5
22 Oct 2026, 17:4114,146-2
21 Oct 2026, 11:4914,148+9
20 Oct 2026, 08:2714,139first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 14,155 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,390
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held67 (7 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total127,850
Reactions total2,776
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,460
Videos
≈12
Links
≈82

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,108 reactions across 66 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5,40353.5%
😭1,36413.5%
❤9379.27%
🥴8808.71%
🌚4824.77%
😍3583.54%
🔥2692.66%
🤔2102.08%
👍960.95%
❤‍🔥570.564%
🐳520.514%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 67 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goldpush. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,990 views145 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ждем ук рф в формате манги ✨

😭91😁53❤1

5 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC≈5,360 views258 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

О, вот эта хорошая 👀

😁210❤31❤‍🔥12🥴3🌚2

30 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈6,490 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

5 ноября в Москве соберутся те, кто принимает маркетинговые решения на основе данных Уже в шестой раз Brand Analytics Conference объединяет специалистов, которые привыкли опираться на цифры, а не на интуицию. Один день, четыре зала, и из каждого можно уйти с готовыми идеями для работы. Что в программе: — Соцсети России: свежие данные о том, где сейчас аудитория, и прогноз на 2027 год от самих платформ. — Нейросети…

❤3😭3🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 08:27 UTC≈4,840 views87 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Рифмы нет, ну и ладно

🥴56😁26🤔5

26 Oct 2026, 14:45 UTC≈6,470 views64 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

пуш предназначен для киборгов 🩼 🤖

😁46🌚14❤4

23 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC≈9,070 views291 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Спасибо, конечно, но не от всего сердца

😁211🥴72❤8

22 Oct 2026, 08:31 UTC≈6,670 views95 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ЗЯ решил напомнить, что ностальгия, вообще-то, штука бесплатная ✨

🥴53❤32❤‍🔥7🔥2🌚1

21 Oct 2026, 11:45 UTC≈6,340 views144 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Саша, это по-настоящему

😁124❤17🌚3

20 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC≈8,350 views143 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Опрос для московских трансов о состоянии плитки в этом сезоне. 10к на Тройку по результатам опроса 🙃

😁128❤9🥴4🐳2

20 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC≈6,410 views110 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Пробка образовалась в пуше. Ждем пока загорится 🟢

😁71😍18🔥11❤‍🔥6❤4

17 Oct 2026, 08:35 UTC≈6,830 views95 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ура, выходные!

😁65❤24🤔6

16 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC≈6,860 views109 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Даже не знаю, что лучше > Почувствовать себя сударыней > Или тот факт, что они сделали блины фрамбини

😁90🤔9👍5❤4🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @goldpush. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,719
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Что вы мне рекламируете?
@honestmarketing · 30,483
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,198
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 106,829
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,311
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Лингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,379
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Зашкваркетинг
@dankmarketing · 58,627
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,912
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,275
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
ХОТ ДИДЖИТАЛ от Влада Ситникова
@HotDigital · 22,426
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Креативный Маркетинг
@AdPoster · 20,871
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 September 2026
гура́
@creativeee · 59,594
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Кинжал
@Le_kinzhal · 46,010
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,007
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Партизанский Маркетинг
@GuerrillaMarketing · 105,260
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Котлер.Media
@atlasonair · 31,886
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Беседки наседки
@besedki_nasedki · 60,189
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,488
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Связь Вишневского
@pokamojno · 23,322
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,540
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Это работа для редактора
@glvrd_job · 22,891
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,102
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Золотые пуши” (@goldpush), 14,155 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldpush.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.