5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,437–5,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:54
5,438
-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:28
5,440
-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:33
5,442
+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:00
5,441
no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:48
5,441
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 5,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
571
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
25 (28 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
14,281
Reactions total
594
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
594 reactions across 25 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
192
32.3%
👍
102
17.2%
💯
94
15.8%
custom 5271630485309640106
73
12.3%
❤
58
9.76%
❤🔥
40
6.73%
😍
13
2.19%
🤔
5
0.842%
🤩
5
0.842%
🕊
4
0.673%
👏
3
0.505%
🥰
3
0.505%
👌
2
0.337%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 594reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
494
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
588
over 24 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJwCyiZ
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
💡 В двух словах: Security Vision SIEM
Как собрать события из разных источников, увидеть взаимосвязь между ними и оперативно обнаружить подозрительную активность в инфраструктуре?
В новом выпуске рубрики «В двух словах» эксперт Security Vision Яна Барсукова рассказывает о возможностях Security Vision SIEM и показывает, как решение помогает специалистам контролировать события информационной безопасности.
ℹ️ В выпу…
❗️ Почему браузеры считают сайты банков небезопасными?
Эксперт Security Vision Павел Винокуров в беседе с Агентством городских новостей «Москва» обсудил проблему доступа к отечественным ресурсам через зарубежные браузеры и объяснил, с чем связаны уведомления о небезопасном соединении.
Специалист раскрыл техническую причину появления подобных предупреждений и перечислил доступные варианты решения проблемы для польз…
⚡️ Новые требования к защите персональных данных: что изменится для компаний
ФСТЭК России опубликовала проект приказа, который масштабнo обновляет требования к защите персональных данных. Директор департамента мониторинга кибербезопасности Security Vision Николай Гончаров выступил экспертом в материале издания «Коммерсантъ», посвященном грядущим изменениям. Вместе с другими участниками рынка он обсудил, какие новые…
❗️ Red Teaming: когда компании пора проверять защиту в реальных условиях
Насколько действительно эффективны инвестиции в кибербезопасность? Чтобы это понять, недостаточно просто найти уязвимости в ИТ-инфраструктуре. Важно проверить, сможет ли организация обнаружить и нейтрализовать действия реального мотивированного злоумышленника.
💬 В своей новой статье Руслан Рахметов, генеральный директор Security Vision, расс…
🔤 Экспертный взгляд на искусственный интеллект
В рамках социальной миссии по повышению киберграмотности Security Vision регулярно делится своей экспертизой и помогает широкой аудитории ориентироваться в мире цифровых угроз. Генеральный директор компании Руслан Рахметов запустил серию авторских публикаций на портале «АиФ», где простым языком разбирает важные и актуальные вопросы кибербезопасности, с которыми ежеднев…
⭐️ Партнёрский воркшоп для инженеров: обмен опытом и знакомство с новыми продуктами
Security Vision уделяет особое внимание выстраиванию крепких и долгосрочных отношений со своими партнёрами.
Глубокое знание продуктов помогает обеспечивать заказчикам самый высокий уровень сервиса и поддержки на всех этапах работы с решениями Security Vision. Именно в рамках этой работы 29 июля состоялся второй очный партнёрский вор…
🔄 Security Vision SIEM: современная система для полного цикла работы SOC
Современный центр мониторинга информационной безопасности ежедневно обрабатывает огромный объем событий. Но сам по себе сбор журналов не гарантирует защищенность: если часть источников перестала передавать данные, правила корреляции создают слишком много шума, а аналитикам приходится вручную восстанавливать цепочку атаки, критически важный ин…
⚡️ Степан Клепиков рассказал АГН «Москва», чем опасны зарубежные нейросети для корпоративных данных
В беседе с Агентством городских новостей «Москва» эксперт Security Vision Степан Клепиков обсудил угрозы, которые несут иностранные ИИ-платформы для информационной безопасности отечественных организаций.
🔍 Специалист проанализировал недавний громкий случай увольнения сотрудницы из-за передачи рабочих документов в …
⚡️ Реальные границы и скрытые риски применения ИИ в государственном управлении
На фоне принятия нового рамочного закона об искусственном интеллекте и активных дискуссий о цифровизации госсектора эксперты всё чаще оценивают реальные возможности и ограничения алгоритмов в принятии управленческих решений. Директор департамента мониторинга кибербезопасности Security Vision Николай Гончаров в беседе с деловым изданием «…
🔤 В двух словах: Security Vision SOAR
Как превратить множество сигналов от средств защиты в единый процесс управления инцидентами и быстрого реагирования на киберугрозы?
В новом выпуске рубрики «В двух словах» эксперт Security Vision Дарья Перова знакомит с флагманской платформой компании — Security Vision SOAR.
ℹ️ Всего за один выпуск вы разберетесь в ключевых возможностях решения и принципах его работы.
Дарь…
🔥11custom 52716304853096401069👍7❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @svplatform. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 944,000 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Security Vision” (@svplatform), 5,438 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svplatform.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
