Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мыслить как безопасник

Channel

Мыслить как безопасник

@artemov_security

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,211subscribers

+187 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001259937631
TypeChannel
Username@artemov_security
DescriptionМои размышления про корпоративную безопасность, расследования, профайлинг, OSINT, ИБ и самооборону Сайт: https://artemov-security.ru Читайте закреп
Created4 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/artemov_security

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,9519,2299,0906 August 2026 — 9,024 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,024 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,985 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,984 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,974 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,963 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,957 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,952 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,951 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,022 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,036 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,029 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,043 subscribers29 September 2026 — 9,063 subscribers6 October 2026 — 9,174 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,165 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,158 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,155 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,169 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,176 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,183 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,226 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,229 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,217 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,213 subscribers10 November 2026 — 9,211 subscribers9,2116 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,909–9,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 12:209,211-2
6 Nov 2026, 21:209,213-4
3 Nov 2026, 23:499,217-12
1 Nov 2026, 10:109,229+3
29 Oct 2026, 09:359,226+43
26 Oct 2026, 18:389,183+7
24 Oct 2026, 04:209,176+7
21 Oct 2026, 05:099,169+14
18 Oct 2026, 10:099,155-3
15 Oct 2026, 18:489,158-7
12 Oct 2026, 22:379,165-9
6 Oct 2026, 21:409,174+111
29 Sept 2026, 18:009,063+20
19 Sept 2026, 10:429,043+14
15 Sept 2026, 00:599,029-7
11 Sept 2026, 19:019,036+14
7 Sept 2026, 10:369,022+71
2 Sept 2026, 05:278,951-1
30 Aug 2026, 13:548,952-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:348,957first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 9,211 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held45 (18 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total14,481
Reactions total283
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈922
Videos
≈60
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

928 reactions across 45 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29031.3%
🔥15716.9%
❤15016.2%
👏12113.0%
🤣818.73%
🎉303.23%
🫡202.16%
🤔192.05%
🙏171.83%
💔111.19%
👎70.754%
🥰70.754%
😐60.647%
🤮50.539%
😭40.431%
🤯30.323%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 928 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 45 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artemov_security. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC230 views15 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Коллеги, всех причастных, с праздником! 12 ноября отмечается "день специалиста по безопасности". Всем нам интересных кейсов, побольше глупых жуликов и понимания со стороны руководства 😎️️️️️️ #asc_security 📱 Канал | 🌐 ВК | 🔷 Сайт

🎉6👍4❤3👏2

11 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC510 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @ebanistikaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣8❤3🔥2👍1👏1

9 Nov 2026, 07:35 UTC694 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Social_engineeringPhoto

• Огромный лонгрид по исследованию безопасности macOS: от архитектуры системы и директорий до статического анализа, Gatekeeper и других механизмов защиты. • По сути, это настоящая шпаргалка и отличное руководство для Red Team-специалистов, реверс-инженеров и security ресерчеров. Забираем по ссылке ниже: ➡ https://redteamrecipes.com/blog/osmrnotes/ S.E. ▪️ infosec.work ▪️ VT

👍6🤔3🔥2🎉1👏1

5 Nov 2026, 10:10 UTC977 views21 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @profiling_srccsPhoto

Давайте представим. Вы слушаете коллегу, которая рассказывает о том, чем она занималась, когда в офисе произошло воровство. Как понять, в полной ли мере она искренна или что-то недоговаривает? Один из методов, который можно использовать — оценка валидности утверждений (ОВУ), он позволяет системно анализировать рассказ человека о конкретном событии. Но важно понимать: ОВУ не дает точного ответа на вопрос, врет челов…

👍8👏4🔥4❤2🙏2🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,020 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

💼 "Мы маленькие, нас не тронут!" — очень плохой миф в безопасности Частенько такое слышу от представителей малого бизнеса, у которых нет бюджетов на безопасность. В чем заключаются риски такого мышления? 🔹Иногда данные, которые есть у конкретного бизнеса (даже очень не большого) могут иметь ценность просто из-за специфичности. Тогда злоумышленников вообще не будет волновать большие вы или маленькие - взломали и м…

👏10🔥6❤3👍2🫡1🙏1

1 Nov 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,020 views28 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Вот так выглядит идеальный выходной! Жаль, что сейчас не получается это делать так часто, как хотелось бы. Потестил, наконец, облегченный комплект снаряги: Плитник "СЛИК TV-119" и варбелт "КОНТУР TV-144". Впечатления самые лучшие, но, как видно на фото, на плитнике у меня еще модуль (разгрузка) тоже от wartech "КОЧЕВНИК TV-101". Прекрасно работает со "Сликом", когда не хватает подсумков под магазины. Короче, впечатл…

🔥13👍7❤3👏2🤣1🤮1🫡1

31 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,100 views20 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

👽 «После работы нас тошнило». Полицейский, который 15 лет ловил пе**филов (18+) 💬 "Пе**фила сложно распознать. На лбу ни у кого не написано. Рогов и хвоста у него нет». Так полковник полиции в отставке Алексей Родин говорит о тех, на кого охотился большую часть жизни. В 2000 году Алексей пришел в полицию, а последние 15 лет службы он посвятил борьбе с преступлениями против детей. Он стал первым начальником отдела…

💔7👏6👍2🙏2❤1🔥1😐1

29 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,060 views20 reactions2 Starsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Belyaev_STPhoto

🔥[Belyaev_Podcast]🔥 - Выпуск №29: "Что изменилось в ИБ за 20 лет,а что осталось неизменным" 🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜 🤝🤝🤝 📺 [YouTube] 💙 [VK Video] 🎵 [Яндекс Музыка] 💬 [Mave в Tg] 📺 [RuTube] - Нажми кнопку «В ТОП🚀» 🎬 [Другие платформы] 🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜 🤝[О партнерах]: 1️⃣Генеральный медиа-партнер:😎КИБЕР Медиа 2️⃣ Медиа-партнер:🔊Global Digital Space 3️⃣ Медиа-партнер:☁️Компьютерра 4️⃣Медиа-партнер:🙂CISOCLUB 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 💌Стать партнером 🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜 Гость:🔥А…

👍8❤5🔥3👏2🎉1🤮1

26 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,700 views30 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Немножко из рабочего про собеседования Мне по работе периодически приходится проводить собеседования, причем, не только в безопасность, но и на разные другие роли в компании. Есть один вопрос, который очень рекомендую всем собеседующим, который я спрашиваю всегда, вне зависимости от конкретного поведенческого профиля кандидата: 💬 "Расскажите случай/кейс, когда вы ошиблись и к чему это привело" Что оно нам дает…

👍12🔥8❤4🫡2🎉1👏1🤔1😐1

24 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,510 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

🎬 Подразделение специального назначения / GIGN (сериал 2026) Жанр: боевик Описание: Опытный командир спецназа Давид (Томер Сисле) возвращается к оперативной службе, когда неизвестный враг с украденной военной взрывчаткой наносит сокрушительный удар по элитному подразделению. Ему предстоит выследить террориста и защитить молодого крестника Макса, скрывая при этом тайны своего прошлого. https://www.film.ru/serials/p…

👍8🔥5❤4👏2😐2🤔1🤯1

20 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,470 views27 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @profiling_srccsPhoto

Колонка Анны Кулик для РБК До тех пор, пока машины окончательно не заменят людей, главным уязвимым местом любой системы безопасности будет оставаться человек. Именно он придумывает самые технически совершенные средства защиты и хитроумные способы их обхода. Именно он пишет пароли на стикерах, которые попадают на фото с хештегом #ялюблюсвоюработу. Такие риски принято считать непрогнозируемыми, именовать их «человече…

👏9🔥6👍4❤3🎉2🙏2🫡1

16 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,620 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

💙 Лекция для Российского общества «Знание»: "Грани безопасности | Киберпространство как поле боя" В очередной раз поучаствовал в прекрасном проекте Общества "Знание". Предыдущие мои лекции можно посмотреть в этом посте На этот раз - это отдельная ветка "Грани безопасности", в рамках которой поговорили о том, что такое кибервойна в современном мире и почему это касается нас всех. 📺 Смотреть В лекции я постарался…

👍10❤4👏2🔥2🤣2🫡2🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @artemov_security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,889
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
OSINT mindset [ENG]
@osint_mindset_eng · 20,680
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 September 2026
КиберДед official
@deedcoin_club · 23,011
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
PulSe
@Pulsechanel · 20,018
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
Разведка в интернете
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,167
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,629
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Mycroft Intelligence
@mycroftintel · 20,680
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,728
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 45,710
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Social Graph News
@social_graph_channel_ru · 24,442
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 September 2026
Mr. Robot
@elliot_cybersec · 38,905
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
🕵️ Telescan вещает
@tele_scan · 100,414
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 August 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
S.E.Book
@S_E_Book · 23,084
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Cyber Detective
@cybdetective · 28,057
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Бункер Хакера
@book_academ · 21,293
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 September 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,155
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Лаборатория хакера
@lab_hack · 25,404
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
infosecurity
@tg_infosec · 26,845
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
no system is safe // cybersec
@nsis_cybersec · 21,145
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
ZeroDay | Кибербезопасность
@cybersec_academy · 42,579
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 63,440
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мыслить как безопасник” (@artemov_security), 9,211 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemov_security.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.