Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for T.Hunter

Channel

T.Hunter

@tomhunter

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,174subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372839806
TypeChannel
Username@tomhunter
DescriptionTom Hunter news | tomhunter.ru 📔 https://dzen.ru/tomhunter 🤳 https://vk.com/tomhunter 📱 +7 (812) 677-17-05 📧 [email protected] Хэштеги: #news #cve #article Номер заявления: 6780098298
Created3 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tomhunter

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,16914,28314,2266 August 2026 — 14,276 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,277 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,278 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,271 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,261 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,260 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,264 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,268 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,270 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,269 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,265 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,268 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,274 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,279 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,283 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,277 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,279 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,277 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,266 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,267 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,264 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,260 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,250 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,247 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,250 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,246 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,238 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,235 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,234 subscribers29 September 2026 — 14,226 subscribers5 October 2026 — 14,216 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,194 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,184 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,181 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,180 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,176 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,177 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,179 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,184 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,185 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,190 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,185 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,184 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,185 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,184 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,181 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,182 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,187 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,177 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,175 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,171 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,172 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,171 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,173 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,169 subscribers10 November 2026 — 14,174 subscribers14,1746 August 202610 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 96 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,152–14,300 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 15:1914,174+5
9 Nov 2026, 06:0914,169-4
7 Nov 2026, 20:5114,173+2
6 Nov 2026, 18:2814,171-1
5 Nov 2026, 19:0114,172+1
4 Nov 2026, 20:2614,171-4
3 Nov 2026, 20:2014,175-2
2 Nov 2026, 18:2814,177-10
31 Oct 2026, 17:1814,187+5
29 Oct 2026, 14:3714,182+1
28 Oct 2026, 16:0114,181-3
26 Oct 2026, 16:5114,184-1
25 Oct 2026, 19:4814,185+1
24 Oct 2026, 18:0014,184-1
23 Oct 2026, 17:4614,185-5
22 Oct 2026, 20:4714,190+5
21 Oct 2026, 15:3614,185+1
20 Oct 2026, 11:1714,184+5
19 Oct 2026, 12:0214,179+2
18 Oct 2026, 14:2714,177first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 14,174 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.406%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held55 (29 May 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total25,840
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,070
Videos
≈16
Links
≈3,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

666 reactions across 54 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20130.2%
🔥14922.4%
👍12318.5%
😁10115.2%
😱162.40%
💯142.10%
🤡142.10%
🤬142.10%
🤝121.80%
🤔91.35%
🎉81.20%
😢30.45%
👎20.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 685 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚨 NetScaler: отключить DTLS недостаточно Восемь уязвимостей в одном бюллетене Citrix. Две уже используют в атаках. Но одинаковая оценка 9,5 по CVSS 4.0 скрывает разные условия 🔴 CVE-2026-88771 Выполнение команд без авторизации. Дополнительные функции включать не нужно: уязвимая версия опасна и со стандартной конфигурацией 🔴 CVE-2026-88772 Переполнение памяти с возможностью выполнения кода или отказа в обслуживании…

❤2👍2

7 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,470 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Сервер еще не загрузился. Чужой код уже может работать Кнопка питания ↓ Прошивка запускает загрузку по сети ↓ Атакующий присылает специально сформированный пакет ↓ Выполнение кода до старта ОС Такой сценарий описывает CVE-2026-97631 в PXE-драйвере TianoCore EDK II, код которого используется в UEFI-прошивках. Бюллетень опубликован 22 октября, оценка CVSS 4.0: 9,5 Ошиб…

👍3🔥2❤1

4 Nov 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,820 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🧩 Пропустили бы такой JWT? К API платежей приходит токен доступа: ✅ Подпись корректна ✅ Издатель доверенный ✅ Срок действия не истек 📌 В aud указан только сервис отчетов Принимать? Нет. Этот токен предназначен другому сервису Поле aud (audience) указывает получателей JWT. Если оно присутствует, а идентификатора вашего API среди значений нет, токен нужно отклонить. Правильная подпись этого не меняет Если API прове…

❤5👍4🔥3

2 Nov 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,010 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔓 «Разрешить приложению читать вашу почту?» Кнопка «Принять» — и у чужого приложения появляется доступ к переписке. Без кражи пароля Так может выглядеть consent phishing. Сотруднику предлагают подключить «помощника для встреч». Он попадает на настоящую страницу Microsoft, входит в аккаунт и видит запрос разрешений. Все выглядит привычно Но за безобидным названием скрывается вредоносное приложение. Если политики к…

👍5❤2🔥2🤔1🤬1

30 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,520 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔥 GitLab: две уязвимости на 10.0 за девять дней 🗓 12 октября CVE-2026-97229, CVSS 10.0. Переполнение в компиляторе регулярных выражений CI/CD при определенных условиях дает выполнение кода на сервере без авторизации. Уязвимы версии с 19.2 по 19.4 🗓 13 октября Rapid7 публикует PoC для уязвимости CVE-2026-97229: команды выполняются от пользователя git. Censys находит около 26 тыс. хостов с уязвимой версией 🗓 21 октя…

❤3🔥2😁2🤝1

28 Oct 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,410 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🛡 Приказ ФСТЭК №60: пентест стал частью аттестации С 1 сентября 2026 действует приказ №60, который изменил порядок аттестации объектов информатизации (приказ №77). Сравним: ❌ Было: пентест при аттестации прямо не требовался ✅ Стало: обязателен для ГИС и систем госсектора 1 и 2 класса с выходом в интернет или связью с другими ИС, включая системы подрядчиков ❌ Было: методы периодического контроля не назывались ✅ Ста…

❤5😱2👍1🔥1🤔1

26 Oct 2026, 12:31 UTC≈2,380 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔥 PHP2Shell: проверьте себя 21 октября закрыли две критические уязвимости в PHP (CVE-2026-109618 и CVE-2026-109619, CVSS 9.2): выполнение кода без авторизации. Cloudflare видит миллионы попыток атак, успешных взломов пока не подтверждено 🔺 Где у вас PHP? Сайты, панели хостинга, контейнеры. Обновить CMS и плагины мало, нужен патч самого PHP 🔺 Какая версия? Исправлены 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 и 8.2.35. php -v не покаж…

👍4❤2🔥1

23 Oct 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,430 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

❓Что логировать, чтобы расследование состоялось Инцидент случился, аналитик открывает логи, а там пусто или одни входы на firewall. Понять, как злоумышленник прошел по сети, нечем. Чаще дело не в злоумышленнике, а в том, что нужные события не писались Минимум, без которого расследование не строится: 🔹 Запуск процессов. Что, кем и с какими аргументами (Windows Event 4688 или Sysmon). По нему видно цепочку 🔹 PowerShe…

👍4❤2🔥1

21 Oct 2026, 12:36 UTC≈2,700 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎯 Threat hunting по MITRE ATT&CK: с чего начать Threat hunting это проактивный поиск злоумышленника, который уже внутри, но тревогу не поднял. Не ждем алерт, а сами проверяем гипотезы. MITRE ATT&CK здесь каркас: база знаний о тактиках и техниках реальных атак С чего начать: 1. Проверьте, что видите. Поиск без данных невозможен. Сопоставьте техники ATT&CK с тем, что реально пишется в логи (процессы, PowerShell, сет…

❤4🔥2🤝1

19 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,350 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔐 Фишинг-устойчивая аутентификация Многофакторная аутентификация давно обязательна. Но защищает не сам второй фактор, а то, какой он и как настроен. Коды из SMS и push-уведомления «подтвердите вход» закрывают простые атаки, но в некоторых случаях не спасают Где это не усиливает защиту: 🔹 Код из SMS пользователь вводит сам. На поддельной странице его перехватывает прокси и подставляет на настоящий сайт 🔹 Push с одно…

👍4❤2🔥2😁1😱1

16 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,480 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💾 Бэкап, который переживет шифровальщик Перед шифрованием данных злоумышленники ищут и удаляют резервные копии, чтобы не оставить вам выбора. Копия «в соседней папке» под той же учеткой это не страховка, а еще одна жертва Правило 3-2-1-1-0: 🔹 3 копии данных 🔹 на 2 разных носителях 🔹 1 копия вне площадки (offsite) 🔹 1 копия офлайн или неизменяемая (air-gap / immutable) 🔹 0 ошибок при тесте восстановления Ключевые д…

👍6❤5🔥2😁2💯1

14 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,240 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🏢 Свой SOC или аутсорс (MSSP): когда что SOC нужен всем, но строить с нуля — не всегда оправдано. Вопрос не «что лучше», а «что под вашу зрелость и бюджет» 🔻 Свой SOC оправдан, когда: — есть ограничения на вынос данных вовне (гостайна, отдельные контуры, спецтребования) — инфраструктура большая и специфичная, внешней команде ее долго изучать — есть люди и бюджет на круглосуточные смены (это 12+ человек: L1/L2, и…

🔥3❤2🤝1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @tomhunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,748
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
🕵️ Telescan вещает
@tele_scan · 100,614
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 August 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,194
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
S.E.Reborn
@S_E_Reborn · 22,459
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6
@f6_cybersecurity · 22,363
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,313
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Разведка в интернете
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,184
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 45,728
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Лаборатория хакера
@lab_hack · 25,423
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
CYBER HUNTER - Кибербезопасность
@cyberbezopasno · 58,602
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 26 August 2026
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,873
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
Кладовка Pavlu
@KladovkaPavlu · 64,668
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,532
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Этичный Хакер
@hack_less · 243,065
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,555
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Mycroft Intelligence
@mycroftintel · 20,691
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
Cyber Detective
@cybdetective · 28,012
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
Social Graph News
@social_graph_channel_ru · 24,458
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 September 2026
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 117,768
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
no system is safe // cybersec
@nsis_cybersec · 21,166
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
Mr. Robot
@elliot_cybersec · 38,923
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“T.Hunter” (@tomhunter), 14,174 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomhunter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.