2it43obQHUmfK4x8swUF8ncwPyRkCpb6CVU3tGefpump This guys my spirit animal 60k degen play

Channel
Patty's Trap House
@pattystraphouse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,933subscribers
+399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002044250771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pattystraphouse |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pattystraphouse |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 2,933 | +399 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 2,534 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 2,534 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.2%
- avg views ÷ 2,933 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 709
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 March 2026 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 709 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
This is the closest thing you’re ever going to get to free money in gambling… It’s confirmed that MetaWin is doing another $4M USDT airdrop in July. Everyone who deposits on metawin.com before the drop qualifies for part of the $4M. So what you should do is go deposit and do 1 spin. That way you guarantee yourself the airdrop. And if you get lucky you turn $2.50 into $18k like this guy just did in the process.
✅ Iconic meme launched on ETH in 23. More powerful than Wojak and in the same family. Meme recently tweeted by the White House. Elon uses short replies and reposts with "Yes" all the time, very similar to Chad. Engagement is a no brainier especially with the political landscape as it is. Memes and memecoins will be used to push narratives popular with the powerful and Chad it at the center of the zeitgeist of the da…
Just study his Twitter. He’s relentless. Top 5 bull posters
https://x.com/gigagriff/status/2055377594892128399?s=46&t=XNC3mM_C1ZLLv0jLlMLwag
Photo, posted without a caption
AXQyzYRdk6ebp3VdwSNNNFR5Ssm5rMVTP84EEg98pump $dca One simple thesis Giga griff bull posted one coin in two years $giga He’s now bull posting $dca I bought 1% I will explain no further
you cant stop the $bull one of the stronger coins ive seen in months Next leg up will melt faces
Market loking great and $bull is best mascot for a bull market Chart reflecting it and much higher from here!
https://x.com/specialist_a_/status/2049216878095016018?s=46&t=XNC3mM_C1ZLLv0jLlMLwag
0x5cc0846ea203ffdad359ad4c31a7dfb2f62e1110 $clippy but on eth Hearing team behind it is solid as well 200k rn
bottom was in and indeed just almost touched 8 mill Congrats to all the bulls Higher and to the right i say!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pattystraphouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,142,915 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Patty's Trap House” (@pattystraphouse), 2,933 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pattystraphouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.