Channel
@crypto_bobles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,599subscribers
-680 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001310651773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_bobles |
| Description | ⚠️ Be aware of scammers! The real channel only: @crypto_bobles The real admin (me) only: @radarplot The real TikTok (940k followers) only: https://tiktok.com/@cryptobobles ❗️Check my Telegram username against my official TikTok at BIO to avoid scam. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_bobles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 49,599 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 49,623 | -43 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 49,666 | -66 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 49,732 | -47 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 49,779 | -34 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 49,813 | -49 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 49,862 | -35 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 49,897 | -18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 49,915 | -47 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 49,962 | -47 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 50,009 | -68 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 50,077 | -24 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 50,101 | -57 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 50,158 | -40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 50,198 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 50,221 | -34 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 50,255 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 50,279 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 50,279 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,597 reactions across 19 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 388 | 24.3% | |
| ❤ | 345 | 21.6% | |
| 🔥 | 208 | 13.0% | |
| ⚡ | 165 | 10.3% | |
| 👀 | 59 | 3.69% | |
| 👏 | 52 | 3.26% | |
| 👌 | 50 | 3.13% | |
| 🤯 | 49 | 3.07% | |
| 🏆 | 46 | 2.88% | |
| 💯 | 28 | 1.75% | |
| 😱 | 28 | 1.75% | |
| 🤩 | 25 | 1.57% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 1.50% | |
| 🤔 | 23 | 1.44% | |
| 😐 | 18 | 1.13% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 1.00% | |
| 🤨 | 15 | 0.939% | |
| 🌚 | 14 | 0.877% | |
| 🍌 | 13 | 0.814% | |
| 👻 | 9 | 0.564% | |
| 7 further kinds | 22 | 1.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 22 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔 According to Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan, Bitcoin’s growth is driven by the fact that the current economic policy under Trump has “broken the economy.” 🧪He also believes that the rally will only strengthen once Trump’s team starts “cleaning things up.”
⚡63❤35🔥29👍28🤔17🤨10🌚6😈6
🔼BTC 90k
❤124👍18🔥13😱12👌8👻8🤩8⚡6
🐳 A whale who staked 991,000 SOL four years ago (worth $26 million at the time) has earned a total profit of $153.5 million. 🤑 Profit from staking Solana over 4 years: • $111.4 million from SOL price appreciation (from $27 to $140). • $42.08 million from staking rewards on 300,000 SOL.
👏37❤18🤯14👍6🏆3⚡2🎉2😁2
🧪 Gold hit a new all-time high of $3500 per ounce.
⚡23❤14🔥8🙏5💯3🍌2👌2👍2
💰 An ATM in China that melts gold. 👀 It works simply: you put a gold object into the machine, it determines the grade and melts the metal in 30 minutes, after which you are credited for the pure weight of the gold.
⚡29❤20😱12🔥7👍6👌3🏆1
🤔 Arthur Hayes thinks now may be the last chance to buy BTC below $100,000
👍29🔥9🍌4⚡3👌2👏2😁2❤1
🧪Altseason usually begins approximately 340 days after the BTC halving. In the meantime, Bitcoin has finally broken upward and is now trying to hold above the next key level at $87K.
👍67🔥30❤17🤩6🙏5👀4👌4💯4
🧪Analysts at Cryptollica believe that Bitcoin could reach $155,000 by the end of 2025, citing its correlation with gold. 🟡Historically, Bitcoin lags behind gold by approximately 100–150 days. Additionally, BTC is mirroring the pattern of the M2 money supply, which is also signaling potential growth.
👍39❤12⚡9👀3🔥3🙏3🌚1🍌1
🪀 Tether has frozen 870,000 USDT across three wallet addresses, according to analysts from MistTrack. – The first address on the TRON network is linked to wallets that previously interacted with WhiteBIT and OKX. – The second address, on Ethereum, was reportedly involved in fraudulent activities including phishing, theft, and scams such as Pig Butchering. – The third address is associated with the Gate.io exchange. …
👌19❤6👀3👍3💯3🌚2😁2🤔1
🚀 $bobls listed on Coinranking https://x.com/mrboblles/status/1913147247769903368?s=46 What’s the next one… 👀
🔥57❤8🏆5👍4🍌3⚡2👌2💯1
⚡️ Zach Shapiro, head of the Bitcoin Policy Institute, believes that if the United States were to acquire 1 million BTC — worth approximately $83.5 billion at current prices — it could push the price of Bitcoin to $1 million. 👀 He notes that such a move would likely prompt other countries to follow suit and begin building their own BTC reserves in order to keep pace with this emerging global trend. 🟡 At the same ti…
🔥19❤10👍5⚡2🌚2👏2😁2💯1
🐳 A whale who received 76,000 ETH through the ICO has sold 3,000 ETH ($4.78M) after three years of dormancy. 👀 Today, a whale transferred 6,000 ETH to a new address, and it’s expected that the second batch of 3,000 ETH will also be sold soon. 🤑 At the time of the ICO, they acquired ETH at just $0.3109.
⚡18❤11👀5👍5🔥4🍌2👌2🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_bobles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,613,050 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boblles Channel” (@crypto_bobles), 49,599 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_bobles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.