✍️✍️✍️
❤5

Channel
@GakesBakes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
26,881subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002040892468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GakesBakes |
| Description | gmgn: https://gmgn.ai/r/gake Trojan: https://t.me/menelaus_trojanbot?start=r-gakeyyy X: @Ga__ke Discussions here are not financial advice, Ape at own risk. No other TG Chat. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GakesBakes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 26,881 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 26,883 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 26,887 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 26,886 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 26,888 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:20 | 26,881 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 26,882 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 26,882 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (28 May 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 49,700 |
| Reactions total | 946 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,620 reactions across 26 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 372 | 23.0% | |
| 😭 | 325 | 20.1% | |
| 🤣 | 243 | 15.0% | |
| 👎 | 148 | 9.14% | |
| 👍 | 102 | 6.30% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 3.40% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 3.27% | |
| 🤡 | 53 | 3.27% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 2.41% | |
| 🤮 | 33 | 2.04% | |
| 🤬 | 24 | 1.48% | |
| 🖕 | 22 | 1.36% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 1.30% | |
| 💩 | 17 | 1.05% | |
| ✍ | 10 | 0.617% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 0.556% | |
| 🌭 | 8 | 0.494% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 0.494% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 0.494% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 0.432% | |
| 22 further kinds | 63 | 3.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,620reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GakesBakes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✍️✍️✍️
❤5
Wow deep
❤4👏1
There is no perfect trader. In a domain this noisy, perfection isn't a coherent target. The target is a robust process with survivable variance. Chasing perfection is itself a psychological failure mode — it's perfectionism, and it reliably produces overtrading, revenge trading, and an inability to accept the losses that a correct strategy generates by design.
❤47✍10🤡4😭4🤣2
Well copy pastaed onto stonks hahaha - ok not in the same format / tokenomics design but still leveraged positions in a way There is no moat until your pad has any mindshare so game is game Also good to see things managed to get some integration with terminals to increase visibility but uh as per perpspad the difficulty is how to get any mindshare / relevance still https://x.com/thingsmarket/status/208729783109049…
👍5🤡5❤3👎2
Same narra but now the pad works and sol is going up amidst people more interested in novel tokenomics and experiments 😊
❤7🔥4🦄3👀1
reading the whole fomo vs pump fun x timeline
😭32🤣19❤8💔1😇1
Can’t believe b sol front ran me
😭9❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤19🤓6👎1🤩1
Mitch lied.
🤣57😭14❤7👎4😁4🤡3💘2🤬1
things looking better on chain, hopefully it continues to get more abundant for everybody regardless of whatever chain you're on and best of luck! I do think somewhere along the way with how dead / pvp on chain was I became less of a dreamer; which paradoxically made me miss / midcurve coins for an extended period as well - but maybe just maybe its still important to always try to make the bull/bear case for any/eve…
❤77👍11🔥8🖕3😭3👎2🤣2🥰1
it appears many of you like the pfp
👎24🖕19❤17🤮12👍8🤣5🤡3🥰3
Sob if u like the pfp 👍🏻
😭227👎98👍38🤮21🤡19🤣15❤9🥴9
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @GakesBakes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Are you having fun on RH
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gake’s Bakes” (@GakesBakes), 26,881 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GakesBakes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.