lit on fire rn
π₯43β€7π6π3π1

Channel
@danscryptorants
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
11,524subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001631368049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @danscryptorants |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/danscryptorants |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 11,524 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 11,532 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 11,538 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 11,544 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 11,546 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 11,548 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 11,553 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 11,559 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
691 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 293 | 42.4% | |
| π₯ | 155 | 22.4% | |
| π | 74 | 10.7% | |
| β | 26 | 3.76% | |
| π | 25 | 3.62% | |
| π | 25 | 3.62% | |
| β‘ | 23 | 3.33% | |
| π― | 17 | 2.46% | |
| π | 10 | 1.45% | |
| π | 9 | 1.30% | |
| π | 6 | 0.868% | |
| πΏ | 6 | 0.868% | |
| π | 5 | 0.724% | |
| π» | 3 | 0.434% | |
| π | 3 | 0.434% | |
| π€ | 3 | 0.434% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 0.289% | |
| π | 2 | 0.289% | |
| π₯° | 2 | 0.289% | |
| π | 1 | 0.145% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.145% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 691reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
lit on fire rn
π₯43β€7π6π3π1
btc bottom probs in
β€55π18π10π9π6π―6πΏ5π»3
https://x.com/cryptodan19/status/2072400472573718780?s=20
π₯23β1πΏ1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯14β€4
+75% from entry for $LIT
π₯25
https://x.com/Lighter_xyz/status/2072401921659277595?s=20
https://x.com/ashwathbk/status/2070016222528499866?s=20 really good summary of why hype rallies from buybacks and pump doesn't
β€14π2
tough wall to break $BTC
β‘18β€6
alpha drop on how to analyse l1's (story driven) vs on-chain businesses (fundamentals driven)π
β€19π₯4π1
Voice message, posted without a caption
β€24π3π₯3π3π―2
the more a token looks like a business, the more investors start valuing it like a business. the more it looks like a monetary/network asset, the more it can trade on belief, mindshare, narrative, and terminal optionality
β€27π5π2
unfortunately depin and these other real usecases can't see the same occur without making a ton of money
β€21
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @danscryptorants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 354,015 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βDaniel McEvoyπ°πβ (@danscryptorants), 11,524 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danscryptorants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.