Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Robo Calls

Channel

Robo Calls

@robogems

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,106subscribers

+626 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001712204022
TypeChannel
Username@robogems
Descriptionowner: @robo_pboc gambles channel: @robo_gambles Disclaimer: nothing posted in here is financial advice. memecoins and prediction markets trading is risky. always dyor everything in here is just me sharing my journey and thoughts
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/robogems

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@robogems/8995 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC@veigarcalls/162333 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC1.0012 minutes
@robogems/9002 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC@veigarcalls/162343 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC1.0023 minutes
@robogems/9021 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 22:12 UTC@veigarcalls/162393 Nov 2026, 22:36 UTC1.0023 minutes
@robogems/9058 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC@veigarcalls/162656 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC1.002.7 hours
@robogems/9134 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC@veigarcalls/1630010 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC1.006 minutes
@robogems/9058 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC@ShakerCalls/185166 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC1.003.0 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@veigarcalls5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0023 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@ShakerCalls5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0082 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 36 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,47117,84517,15817,1067 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 95 days, net +626. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,265–18,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:1617,106-12
9 Nov 2026, 07:0617,118-15
6 Nov 2026, 16:4417,133-11
5 Nov 2026, 17:1817,144-11
4 Nov 2026, 17:4717,155-9
2 Nov 2026, 19:2017,164+5
1 Nov 2026, 21:2617,159-27
31 Oct 2026, 18:5817,186-26
30 Oct 2026, 16:3017,212-23
29 Oct 2026, 16:5617,235+12
28 Oct 2026, 19:2017,223-2
27 Oct 2026, 22:0717,225-32
26 Oct 2026, 18:0717,257-9
25 Oct 2026, 19:5517,266-15
24 Oct 2026, 20:3917,281-253
23 Oct 2026, 22:2717,534-19
22 Oct 2026, 21:5817,553-10
21 Oct 2026, 22:2617,563-25
20 Oct 2026, 15:5517,588-13
19 Oct 2026, 13:4517,601first reading

Engagement

387 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.44%
avg views ÷ 17,106 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
184 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
185
of 387 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 180 of 184 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held387 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total202,687
Reactions total2,279
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
184
Links
42

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
54s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,751 reactions across 381 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,88850.2%
🔥70512.3%
🐳4778.29%
👍4047.02%
🏆3826.64%
💯3215.58%
🙏2003.48%
⚡1061.84%
🎃470.817%
🍾440.765%
💊420.73%
✍350.609%
🤝320.556%
🫡290.504%
😎250.435%
🎉50.087%
👾50.087%
🍓40.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 381 of the 387 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,751 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 387 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 385 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @robogems. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 387 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 185 posts held from the last 30 days (2.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 23:41 UTC518 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

ansem on a bad streak lately. he wouldn’t hard shill like this and risk more aura betting that this is the comeback play

👍8❤3

10 Nov 2026, 23:40 UTC530 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

4CxjZyMNoF1p6eXHXHv1TWpS2X47CuUmLwtGe18spump

🙏7🔥3❤1

10 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC578 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

btw entry on $stank but probs wont last a sniper full stacked and its being instantly bought up lol

❤9💯3

10 Nov 2026, 22:41 UTC585 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

solstice now blasting stank too entire stonk and fomo cabal

🔥8❤2🙏1

10 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTC581 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏4👍2❤1

10 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC532 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026

6 million and it hasn’t even started yet that’s the funny thing fartcoin did 400 million in a month and trenches need it more than ever right now

👍6🔥4❤2💯1🙏1

10 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC482 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🆕 | STANK BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 🔷 STONK 3695.1464 ($188.57) 🪙 STANK 31256.97 (Tx) 🔎 Position: New Holder (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $6,031,224 🦅🦅🦅🦅 📊 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁 💲 𝗕𝘂𝘆

❤7

10 Nov 2026, 21:24 UTC606 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

stank is about to be a 100x call on the gambles channel

🔥10❤5

10 Nov 2026, 21:23 UTC538 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🆕 | STANK BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 💨💨 🔷 STONK 7235.8329 ($370.81) 🪙 STANK 66055.72 (Tx) 🔎 Position: New Holder (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $5,611,940 🦅🦅🦅🦅 📊 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁 💲 𝗕𝘂𝘆

❤8🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 387 posts we hold for @robogems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 24,640
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 39,558
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Blessed labs 𓃵
@Blessedmemecalls · 24,054
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
100x Calls 💎
@x100xcallz · 22,966
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 28,843
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,544
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
HD’s Crypto Casino
@wallethuntersio · 22,952
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 September 2026
Phanes Hub
@PhanesHub · 46,378
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 26,457
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,328
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,921
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Meta Gambler
@MetaGambler · 26,844
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,298
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,709
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 September 2026
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,541
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,570
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 25,176
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,281
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Cooker's Cooks
@CookersCooks · 18,772
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
Cold’s Calls 🧊
@coldsdiary · 31,775
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 9 September 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 81,853
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,131
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 44,269
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,842
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Robo Calls” (@robogems), 17,106 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robogems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.