Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoDays 2.0 #MTONGA

@cryptodays

3 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,171subscribers

-133 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002096842173
TypeChannel
Usernames@crocotyping @cryptod_a @cryptodays
DescriptionАвторский шизоблог о криптовалюте и не только. Сотрудничество: @heydenis Реклама: @Boss_kfc / @r4cc00n Не финансовые рекомендации. @GAMBLEBARBER - колы На вопросы отвечаем в чате. Чат: https://t.me/INOTAROBOT?start=Cryptoids
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptodays

Growth

31,10131,30431,202.56 August 2026 — 31,304 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,299 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,304 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,297 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,102 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,101 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,146 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,146 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,146 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,189 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,188 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,200 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,200 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,192 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,195 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,194 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,189 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,184 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,187 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,184 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,177 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,170 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,171 subscribers31,1716 August 202612 August 2026
25 measurements spanning 7 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,071–31,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:3531,171+1
12 Aug 2026, 17:2231,170-7
12 Aug 2026, 16:2431,177-7
11 Aug 2026, 19:4231,184-3
11 Aug 2026, 18:1631,187+3
11 Aug 2026, 17:3631,184-5
10 Aug 2026, 20:5531,189-5
10 Aug 2026, 16:3131,194-1
10 Aug 2026, 14:2431,195+3
9 Aug 2026, 21:3131,192-8
9 Aug 2026, 15:3231,200no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:1131,200+12
9 Aug 2026, 00:5231,188-1
8 Aug 2026, 19:0031,189+6
8 Aug 2026, 16:0231,183+37
8 Aug 2026, 03:3631,146+6
7 Aug 2026, 20:3331,140-6
7 Aug 2026, 17:3031,146no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:2631,146+45
7 Aug 2026, 00:3131,101first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.94%
avg views ÷ 31,171 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held44 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total79,570
Reactions total1,029
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,170
Videos
429
Links
5,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

724 reactions across 31 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁26035.9%
14019.3%
👍11215.5%
custom 52266352654554332207510.4%
🤡557.60%
🤣364.97%
🔥172.35%
💊121.66%
👎81.10%
custom 531911172672403009070.967%
🗿20.276%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,029reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
114
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 43 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
104
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptodays. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC674 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁5custom 531911172672403009021💊1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC676 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну всё пиздец Террорграм

😁5💊1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,180 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мтонга к нам приходит Мтонга к нам приходит

17🤡14💊5

12 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Node Update TON 2026.08 Following the deployment of TON 2026.07 on August 4, the block production rate and other network metrics returned to their normal levels. The next update, TON 2026.08, will activate collators on TON mainnet. Currently, validators both assemble blocks from user transactions and validate them. After the update, these responsibilities will be separated. Dedicated collator nodes will assemble b

7🤡3

11 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,430 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

😁93

11 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC≈1,580 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пока вы не позволяете негативным эмоциям овладеть вами и не определяете себя ими, вы всегда можете придерживаться стратегии "коктейля" (смешанных инвестиций) до тех пор, пока не добьетесь значительного успеха. Я имею в виду, что для этого достаточно всего одной удачной сделки. Удача – это навык; вам нужно достаточно подготовиться, чтобы оказаться в благоприятной ситуации. Думаете, если поймали волну и череду удачны

👍215🔥5

10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,800 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если на этой неделе не будет мтонги, то я буду вынужден наложить себе в руки.

😁3719

9 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,080 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Количество валидаторов в тоне падает вслед за курсом..

custom 522663526545543322013🔥72

9 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,320 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вопросов не имею.

custom 52266352654554332209😁4

7 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈2,190 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @metavlogePhoto

100% прогноз по GRAM’у. Компания-эмитент 21Shares, которая позволяет инвестировать в GRAM (ETP), опубликовала документ с тремя прогнозами стоимости GRAM. По их информации возможны три сценария. Самый печальный - GRAM теряет в цене 98%. Умеренный - GRAM растет на 42%. Благоприятный - GRAM растет на 1337%. Полностью с ними согласен, мы однозначно окажемся в промежутке от -98% до +1337%. Аналитики получают деньги не

😁59custom 5226635265455433220154

7 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,170 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

И снизу победа Тани ммм

😁22custom 52266352654554332204

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,960 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Факт «залета» признан Вот этот пост у меня уже вызывает уважение и возвращает веру в светлое будущее Давайте строить светлый комму телеграм вместе!

🤡16😁3👍2💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @cryptodays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 264,470 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇷🇺 The Club 100 - Криптовалютый окоп, нейро полигон, геймерская усадьба, технический момент
@crypto_okop · 148,771
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
логово ромчика
@togetupblud · 210,393
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
Ондрей Гойчев (DFW Bals)
@ondreigoichev · 162,334
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
GasPump Announcements
@gaspump_tv · 199,707
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
POVEL DUREV / TON memecoin
@poveldurev · 307,867
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoDays 2.0 #MTONGA” (@cryptodays), 31,171 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptodays.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.