🔅$plumber +1 call at $133K mc : ├KOL: Unc Coco Journal | CPW: 414/1000 ├♻️Stats 0xb20000000000000000000029440A9564B59129B1 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️

Channel
Call Analyser (BASE only)
@CallAnalyserBase
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,096subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001948900072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CallAnalyserBase |
| Description | All channels: https://t.me/addlist/rV1KJiyIYTdkMTM1 Bot: @TokenPingBot | @CallAnalyserBot Listing: @tomriddle010 | Owner: @basedev0x Calls from qualified channels only. X: https://x.com/CallAnalyser0x NFA & DYOR. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CallAnalyserBase |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 5,096 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 5,101 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 5,102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 5,102 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.54%
- avg views ÷ 5,096 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 78.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.794%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (17 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,570 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈53
- Videos
- ≈15
- Links
- ≈7,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔅$sami +1 call at $593K mc : ├KOL: BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 | CPW: 526/1000 ├♻️Stats 0x7f7A0A49BfdA13f149f3320eE09edF37A8ABCBA3 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$1F916 +1 call at $383K mc : ├KOL: Maniac Degen Apes | CPW: 485/1000 ├♻️Stats 0x9E00FC92493451EBA1c63DD3880D68b622037bA3 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$RSYST +1 call at $23K mc : ├KOL: 🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews) | CPW: 524/1000 ├Total calls: 4 ♻️Stats 0x74bb664783299f78F24A4d54c30993CF56e4678e 🎯Score: 36/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$RA +1 call at $685K mc : ├KOL: BAEL CALLS 🇮🇩 | CPW: 473/1000 ├♻️Stats 0x9951ADf71Fd6B9A7ceE2f1604D30B9762DF39111 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
Call Analyser (BASE only) pinned a photo
More than a year of strengthening the foundation of our product, it's time for the next step. We chose to begin this chapter on Robinhood. A new era of trading agents is about to begin. $DEFAI Creator No code platform to build, trade, and monetize AI agents powered by DeFi analytics and caller consistency data. CA 0x4d36aF9E9EB72752670cB2C45b0B7D6E0f6B4548 26/07/22 13:15:55 🔐 Items in Cache 📊 💬 1,612 Channels 🪙…
🔅$MEOW +1 call at $25K mc : ├KOL: Blessed labs 𓃵 | CPW: 415/1000 ├♻️Stats 0xb200000000000000000000B8d3746D2E56596578 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
Call Analyser (BASE only) pinned «⭐️Now supports #ROBINHOOD on @TokenPingBot. ⭐️ Give quality calls to your groups/channels. These calls are filtered by @CallAnalyser based on your configuration. ⚡️Detail is here»
⭐️Now supports #ROBINHOOD on @TokenPingBot. ⭐️ Give quality calls to your groups/channels. These calls are filtered by @CallAnalyser based on your configuration. ⚡️Detail is here
🔅$BRIAN +1 call at $2M mc : ├KOL: Onyxx's Gems | CPW: 667/1000 ├Total calls: 22 ♻️Stats 0xB2000000000000000000007BF6D5cBb0E24cB301 🎯Score: 100/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
❤1
🔅$BRIAN +1 call at $3M mc : ├KOL: Gubbins Calls | CPW: 486/1000 ├Total calls: 21 ♻️Stats 0xB2000000000000000000007BF6D5cBb0E24cB301 🎯Score: 100/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CallAnalyserBase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,051,067 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@CallAnalyser · 49,44620 postsCall Analyser Announcement
@CallAnalyserPortal · 7,51819 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 14,63718 postsBAEL CALLS 🇮🇩
@baelcalls · 12,2223 postsBagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 58,5441 postBen Based - GRAM 💎
@BenBasedGambles · 2,3781 postBlessed labs 𓃵
@Blessedmemecalls · 24,6561 postUnc Coco Journal
@crypt0coc0 · 6,2971 postCryptoCat 🀄️🐈⬛
@cryptocatcalls · 8,3801 postDEFAI Creator
@defaicreator · 3,3621 postDEFAI - Hall of Fame 🥇
@defaihalloffame · 1,7421 postDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 33,7981 postDream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 10,7251 postThoth Gems 🌙
@explorer_gems · 3,4911 postGubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 24,1791 post🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 93,3201 postManiac Degen Apes
@maniacapes · 10,8351 postNeo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,1191 postOnyxx's Gems
@OnyxxGems · 3,6731 postGay calls only, buy if ur gay.
@wifechangingcallss · 6,0551 post🐋鲸鱼,投资者之家 ZORO☎️🐋📢
@ZoroChinese_Calls · 10,3751 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Call Analyser (BASE only)” (@CallAnalyserBase), 5,096 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CallAnalyserBase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.