🔅$plumber +1 call at $133K mc : ├KOL: Unc Coco Journal | CPW: 414/1000 ├♻️Stats 0xb20000000000000000000029440A9564B59129B1 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️

Channel
Call Analyser (BASE only)
@CallAnalyserBase
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,223subscribers
+121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001948900072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CallAnalyserBase |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CallAnalyserBase |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 5,223 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 5,224 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 5,225 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 5,226 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:04 | 5,233 | +54 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 5,179 | +44 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 5,135 | +22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 5,113 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 5,104 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 5,100 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 5,096 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 5,101 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 5,102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 5,102 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔅$sami +1 call at $593K mc : ├KOL: BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 | CPW: 526/1000 ├♻️Stats 0x7f7A0A49BfdA13f149f3320eE09edF37A8ABCBA3 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$1F916 +1 call at $383K mc : ├KOL: Maniac Degen Apes | CPW: 485/1000 ├♻️Stats 0x9E00FC92493451EBA1c63DD3880D68b622037bA3 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$RSYST +1 call at $23K mc : ├KOL: 🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews) | CPW: 524/1000 ├Total calls: 4 ♻️Stats 0x74bb664783299f78F24A4d54c30993CF56e4678e 🎯Score: 36/100 🎯BUY: GMGN | Sigma | Maestro | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$RA +1 call at $685K mc : ├KOL: BAEL CALLS 🇮🇩 | CPW: 473/1000 ├♻️Stats 0x9951ADf71Fd6B9A7ceE2f1604D30B9762DF39111 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
Call Analyser (BASE only) pinned a photo
More than a year of strengthening the foundation of our product, it's time for the next step. We chose to begin this chapter on Robinhood. A new era of trading agents is about to begin. $DEFAI Creator No code platform to build, trade, and monetize AI agents powered by DeFi analytics and caller consistency data. CA 0x4d36aF9E9EB72752670cB2C45b0B7D6E0f6B4548 26/07/22 13:15:55 🔐 Items in Cache 📊 💬 1,612 Channels 🪙…
🔅$MEOW +1 call at $25K mc : ├KOL: Blessed labs 𓃵 | CPW: 415/1000 ├♻️Stats 0xb200000000000000000000B8d3746D2E56596578 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
Call Analyser (BASE only) pinned «⭐️Now supports #ROBINHOOD on @TokenPingBot. ⭐️ Give quality calls to your groups/channels. These calls are filtered by @CallAnalyser based on your configuration. ⚡️Detail is here»
⭐️Now supports #ROBINHOOD on @TokenPingBot. ⭐️ Give quality calls to your groups/channels. These calls are filtered by @CallAnalyser based on your configuration. ⚡️Detail is here
🔅$BRIAN +1 call at $2M mc : ├KOL: Onyxx's Gems | CPW: 667/1000 ├Total calls: 22 ♻️Stats 0xB2000000000000000000007BF6D5cBb0E24cB301 🎯Score: 100/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
❤1
🔅$BRIAN +1 call at $3M mc : ├KOL: Gubbins Calls | CPW: 486/1000 ├Total calls: 21 ♻️Stats 0xB2000000000000000000007BF6D5cBb0E24cB301 🎯Score: 100/100 🎯BUY: Sigma | Maestro | GMGN | Photon 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CallAnalyserBase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@CallAnalyser · 49,64520 postsCall Analyser Announcement
@CallAnalyserPortal · 8,13219 postsPIRBView
@coinscan · 37,35118 postsMaestro
@maestro · 45,34218 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 15,12418 postsBAEL CALLS 🇮🇩
@baelcalls · 12,2143 postsBagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 59,8011 postBen Based - GRAM 💎
@BenBasedGambles · 2,5071 postBlessed labs 𓃵
@Blessedmemecalls · 24,6611 postUnc Coco Journal
@crypt0coc0 · 7,1151 postCryptoCat 🀄️🐈⬛
@cryptocatcalls · 8,1511 postDEFAI Creator
@defaicreator · 3,2851 postDEFAI - Hall of Fame 🥇
@defaihalloffame · 1,6781 postDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,2711 postDream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 10,7551 postThoth Gems 🌙
@explorer_gems · 3,8931 postGubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,9001 post🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 90,3881 postManiac Degen Apes
@maniacapes · 10,8681 postNeo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,4831 postOnyxx's Gems
@OnyxxGems · 3,3631 postGay calls only, buy if ur gay.
@wifechangingcallss · 6,2561 post🐋鲸鱼,投资者之家 ZORO☎️🐋📢
@ZoroChinese_Calls · 10,5141 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CallAnalyserSol · 26,053
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Call Analyser (BASE only)” (@CallAnalyserBase), 5,223 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CallAnalyserBase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.