Channel
@presales
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
634subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002228250661 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @babydoge @crypt0 @cryptochannel @cryptomarketing @cryptotips @presales @reminder @techbot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| On Telegram | t.me/presales |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 634 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 634 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 638 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 638 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 638 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 635 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 634 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 634 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 634 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 633 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 630 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 630 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Adamity | $ADAMITY (SOL) Called by Doraemon of X100 CALLS Age: 5 Hours 5 Minutes | MC: $103.63K | Liq: $26.25K Price Volume B/S 5M: 14.9% $5K 71/30 1H: 32.7% $45K 473/317 1D: 193.0% $805K 7K/6K CA: EfupM6buY9QeqVHYcB9Se5ukhavggEkdaxyAWdfKpump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPOR…
❤2👍2
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Burnie Senders | $BURNIE (SOL) Called by Doraemon of X100 CALLS Age: 8 Days | MC: $5.10M | Liq: $254.57K Price Volume B/S 5M: 0.6% $4K 15/30 1H: 1.5% $203K 907/637 1D: 109.0% $2M 8K/8K CA: CGEDT9QZDvvH5GmVkWJH2BXiMJqMJySC9ihWyr7Spump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: …
🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $BURNIE 👉 +0.05X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 2. $RAM900 👉 -0.09X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 3. $crowneck 👉 -0.11X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $LFG 👉 -0.32X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 5. $ADAMITY 👉 -0.38X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 6. $emi 👉 -0.78X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS (Last 24 hours)
@callers pinned «🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $BURNIE 👉 +0.05X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 2. $RAM900 👉 -0.09X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 3. $crowneck 👉 -0.11X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $LFG 👉 -0.32X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 5. $ADAMITY 👉 -0.38X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 6. $emi…»
@callers pinned «🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $testicle 👉 +0.09X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 2. $neet 👉 +0.03X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 3. $crowneck 👉 +0X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $RAM900 👉 -0.01X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 5. $TripleT 👉 -0.17X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 6. $LFG 👉 -0.18X ♻️ …»
🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $testicle 👉 +0.09X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 2. $neet 👉 +0.03X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 3. $crowneck 👉 +0X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $RAM900 👉 -0.01X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 5. $TripleT 👉 -0.17X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 6. $LFG 👉 -0.18X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 7. $Peepa 👉 -0.7X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 8. $emi 👉 -0.78X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS (Last 24 hours)
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL crowneck | $crowneck (SOL) Called by THE EYE 👀 Age: 7 Days | MC: $62.50K | Liq: $21.31K Price Volume B/S 5M: 2.6% $2K 17/12 1H: 66.6% $13K 101/74 1D: 91.4% $34K 492/461 CA: 7VDixmZkVK9UYf6cLJWz3Vid6CUEtC6RHNeJsfJypump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot provides…
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 4th CALL RAM900 | $RAM900 (SOL) Called by BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 Age: 1 Day | MC: $99.05K | Liq: $25.96K Price Volume B/S 5M: -1.1% $291 3/8 1H: 5.2% $8K 93/105 1D: 55.3% $395K 6K/7K CA: FCbkxpEMKRJLw8kikXN6VwTZbKzvuWRdqcLaBpz6pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot provides no…
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Lets Fucking Go | $LFG (SOL) Called by Pow's Gem Calls Age: 8 Days | MC: $309.58K | Liq: $50.29K Price Volume B/S 5M: 21.7% $13K 51/41 1H: 45.5% $20K 77/95 1D: 77.2% $154K 1K/1K CA: Fh5fNaGMHQfencSGj83kyp26RrB3fCoYtYuLvXaRpump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot …
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Doomer Wojak Girl | $emi (SOL) Called by Doraemon of X100 CALLS Age: 11 Hours 20 Minutes | MC: $171.04K | Liq: $34.65K Price Volume B/S 5M: 4.3% $3K 39/22 1H: -22.8% $74K 747/674 1D: 393.0% $1M 15K/11K CA: EQUU2gdzvmabX36rCxKSRSNJKtAedRHEiP8pikC8pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $T…
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 3rd CALL RAM900 | $RAM900 (SOL) Called by Bossy Gambles 🎲{LockedIn ARC} Age: 1 Day | MC: $99.18K | Liq: $25.34K Price Volume B/S 5M: 3.8% $5K 68/100 1H: 49.2% $38K 566/892 1D: 125.0% $230K 7K/6K CA: FCbkxpEMKRJLw8kikXN6VwTZbKzvuWRdqcLaBpz6pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: T…
NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL RAM900 | $RAM900 (SOL) Called by BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 Age: 1 Day | MC: $115.25K | Liq: $27.29K Price Volume B/S 5M: 0.1% $5K 57/61 1H: 63.1% $21K 303/415 1D: 146.0% $213K 7K/6K CA: FCbkxpEMKRJLw8kikXN6VwTZbKzvuWRdqcLaBpz6pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot provides …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @presales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 351,837 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@presales named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@callers” (@presales), 634 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/presales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.