not every app asks you to spend money before you can explore what it offers. came across Ember, and so far I love what I see it’s a free-to-play app that streams sats to your phone every hour, you can use those sats to play games, rip collectible packs and collect rewards. no initial deposit needed to get started (so refreshing lmao) definitely worth checking out. Code: MNGLQHIKNWC Join here: https://emberfund.…

Channel
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 🐧
@brookcalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,712subscribers
-917 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001829968037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brookcalls |
| Description | Hunting for daily alpha plays | Nothing is FA, sharing my trades and convicitions. Admin: @Brookxbt Gamble: https://t.me/Brookriskyplays X: https://x.com/Brookxbt |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brookcalls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 04:09 | 29,712 | -18 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:19 | 29,730 | -10 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:45 | 29,740 | -28 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 29,768 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 29,781 | -85 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:36 | 29,866 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:40 | 29,874 | -116 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 29,990 | -19 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 30,009 | -95 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 30,104 | -116 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 30,220 | +1,100 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 29,120 | -811 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 29,931 | -729 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 30,660 | -65 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 30,725 | -54 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:25 | 30,779 | -494 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:34 | 31,273 | -163 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 31,436 | -43 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 31,479 | -163 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 31,642 | first reading |
Engagement
276 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.5%
- avg views ÷ 29,712 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,120
- 55 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.045%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 55
- of 276 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 276 (26 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 171,670 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,250
- Videos
- ≈304
- Links
- ≈5,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 20s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 72 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 64.0% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 276 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 276 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 274 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brookcalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 276 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Aped here $AMERICA First on Robinhood We use trading fees to fund trump accounts. We have a federally approved 501c3 non profit as well. Token name: America first. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x780580482be0d4c77f5bb5d9a6bef8c79db8b3ecd27d38983f0fdbee0d55721e 0x985b409bf89848611645F784f047e8408D1Ae9B5
kinetiq’s mascot 0x547A2a9C5AF6E4372EAD794e80EaF3F42dbBaaaC https://x.com/kinetiq_xyz/status/2109983025450844430?a=5ljLfH2YGTblsamltcU&s=46
🤯1
Looking for a trading tool on Elysium Chain? Cove is worth checking out. It’s multichain, so you don’t need to worry about swapping or bridging assets. You can trade using USDC across Robinhood, Solana, Ethereum, and other supported chains, with zero gas fees. Pretty convenient if you ask me. Try Cove here: https://t.me/cove_trading_bot?start=ref_brookxbt Not a paid ad, just sharing a cool product we’ve been us…
Gelysium
👏1
Achievement Unlocked: x3! ☝️ @brookcalls made a x3+ call on Big Titty Coin. $816K ➡️ $2.4M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts
C5xph2yL6gMdxmuLGxJBkGpmuDFfyi5fqkBNhvL6pump
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2119137465323708895?a=jrwju2YcicujSD234uc&s=46 sending
87CQtouHSb6YCXaPZ1pp8jD56VudRMXBVqU3oDMD1UJT everyone in
Stank the next stonk runner?
5wsjHxT5nW5jQuVupXUNnYszF3WoWCfGGk9LMcsCJzY8 watching for dip entry
Gm gm
Showing the 12 most recent of 276 posts we hold for @brookcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @brookcalls as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 3 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@arcanegems · 46,6634 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,2893 poststhe js cult 🔱
@jsdao · 34,2242 postsMarcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,9212 postsA’s alpha
@missorplays · 34,2972 postsNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,1781 postProfits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,7241 postTruthMarketNews️
@TruthMarketNews · 9101 postAhboyash Reads
@ahboyashreads · 15,9501 postIan's Intel
@iansintel · 15,5781 post.
@missorgambles · 8,8801 postMlm onchain
@mlmonchain · 28,7481 postSpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,4841 postTheo's Journal
@theosjournal1 · 6,8111 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@spydefi · 41,86815 postsPhanes [Gold]
@PhanesGoldBot · 19,16611 postsMaestro
@maestro · 28,5159 postsRick
@rick · 54,6038 postsBasedBot
@based_eth_bot · 40,8317 postsBloom EVM
@BloomEVMbot · 11,6426 postsTEST CHANNEL
@hookah · 1,7604 postsBloom Solana
@BloomSolana_bot · 14,7043 postsSpyDefi Live
@SpyDefiLive · 1,9113 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,2893 postsRick’s Lab
@rickburpbotnews · 75,9562 posts方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,3781 postChump Coin Official Announcement Channel
@CHUMPCOIN21B · 9,4781 postDarkSwap official support
@DarkSwapApp · 4,5931 postNear Intents
@near_intents · 3,3131 postПродаж техніки📲
@povmarket · 81 postTruthMarketNews️
@TruthMarketNews · 9101 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@brookcalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mad_apes_gambles · 98,187#1
@TheReaperGems · 14,045#2
@bagcalls · 53,621#3
@PowsGemCalls · 111,030#4
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,662#5
@DreamCalls100x · 11,654#6
@DizzyWhaleCalls · 6,766#7
@mad_apes_call · 78,667#8
@TBGgambLes · 5,565#9
@AnimeGems · 9,605#10
@batman_gem · 19,093#11
@buythedipcall · 1,697#12
@LevisGemCalls · 12,092#13
@JulzLabs · 4,628#14
@FrenzGems · 4,975#15
@BasedDegenGems · 2,676#16
@luigiscalls · 8,599#17
@GemsmineEth · 5,718#18
@maythousdegens · 15,256#19
@Jeetycallss · 3,862#20
@ProwerCalls · 15,276#21
@ElonMuskCallz · 3,131#22
@RiskyGemsHuntersCalls · 3,025#23
@archercallz · 2,685#24
@GundamZone · 1,551#25
@TopCallersChannel · 3,494#26
@aliceandrave · 1,433#27
@GabbensCalls · 10,825#28
@ThanosGems · 10,510#29
@MakeMoneyWithMattTG · 28,194#30
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,776#31
@CallAnalyserEth · 4,996#32
@smartmaxidegens · 2,179#33
@itachigems · 2,557#34
@ApeWizardCalls · 1,762#35
@MarkDegens · 23,194#36
@Archerrgambles · 5,588#37
@ryoshigamble · 36,608#38
@DegenSeals · 34,141#39
@Maestrosdegen · 35,486#40
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,090#41
@arcanegems · 46,663#42
@walloftrophies · 16,171#43
@gubbinscalls · 25,821#44
@BrainstormAlphas · 6,212#45
@degensgems · 14,854#46
@printspress · 18,789#47
@CallAnalyserTRX · 4,132#48
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 24,158#49
@ZionGems · 2,501#50
@SapphireCalls · 12,102#51
@crypt0coc0 · 7,378#52
@bunnycalls · 9,295#53
@MaybachCalls · 31,443#54
@CraftyGambles · 10,869#55
@watisdes · 29,870#56
@TERPS_X100_CALLS · 3,250#57
@mooneagle_call · 3,178#58
@GenesisChain_Calls · 14,207#59
@metacaller · 41,074#60
@xraygambles · 11,534#61
@sugarydick · 33,013#62
@rollingapes_calls · 3,199#63
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,765#64
@DeezeSignal · 3,630#65
@crismooncalls · 1,375#66
@kobesgambles · 15,696#67
@Noah_crypto_calls · 9,049#68
@maythouscalls · 35,107#69
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,281#70
@NeoCallss · 17,518#71
@QuartzAlphaX · 7,946#72
@Chadleycalls · 6,199#73
@Paradoxes1 · 8,996#74
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,580#75
@NFG_GAMBLES · 4,180#76
@veigarcalls · 24,799#77
@spidersjournal · 32,484#78
@zacsjournal · 6,735#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MaybachCalls · 31,443
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@batman_gem · 19,093
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
@Bigbulloficial · 63,522
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 🐧” (@brookcalls), 29,712 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brookcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.