https://x.com/protoverse_ai/status/1741579320298991943
❤9🕊3🥰3🔥2👍1

Channel
@News_PVR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
359subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001957014389 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @News_PVR |
| Description | Announcement channel for @ProtoVerse_ai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/News_PVR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 359 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 359 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 360 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,053 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 472 | 44.8% | |
| ❤ | 336 | 31.9% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 11.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 93 | 8.83% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 0.76% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.665% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.57% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.475% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.475% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.095% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,053reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2023 to 31 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/protoverse_ai/status/1741579320298991943
❤9🕊3🥰3🔥2👍1
Merry Christmas if you celebrate Christmas. 💙 https://x.com/protoverse_ai/status/1738857609497637358
❤10🔥1
🫵 Your opinion is required on essential matters! Make sure to join the 🔵 @ProtoVerse_ai VC on the 13th of December at 5.30 PM UTC.
🔥15
💡💡💡 🔔 UPDATE: We are in close contact with CertiK and are assisting them. The challenge seems to be that the comprehensive answer our Chief Duck sent to CertiK in 2022 is playing hide and seek. Rest assured, we are pushing hard. https://x.com/ProtoVerse_AI/status/1733079866235633968
❤43💯3👍2❤🔥1
🆘 ATTENTION $PVR Community 🔵 We owe you our gratitude for the past few years, and we are happy to let you know that we are in discussions with a CEX known from Crypto Twitter (CT), which extended an incredible offer for hosting an IEO for $PVR after the PinkSale presale, and a direct listing afterward on their exchange. This would bring $PVR to the doorsteps of millions of users! 🔥 We also met with nearly all of th…
❤58🔥5👍4💊1
💡💡💡 The team is waiting on 🛡CertiK to update the 🔵$PVR audit report. That will enable 😊PinkSale to add the audit badge 🚀, as they only accept audits made by their partners. 😊PinkSale is not yet partnered with 🛡Salusec.io, which has already updated and released its audit. https://t.co/mjYBrssul6
❤44👍3
💡💡💡 📌 We are eager to announce that Salus Security released their audit ✅ The supply was minted, as planned, to the 3/6 MultiSig Vault and will today be distributed and locked according to the WP. More is coming… ⚡️ Find the audit report and MultiSig vault links on X🔽 https://x.com/protoverse_ai/status/1731952731563139104
🔥47❤5💯5👍1
Faaaam😏🔥 https://cryptopanic.com/news/19084527/ProtoVerse-PVR-Fundamental-Analysis-Empowering-Everyone-to-Build-Powerful-DApps-on-the-WixCOM-of-Web3
🔥46❤8
Buuuuuullish Fam🔥🔥 CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/656e333c6265555c7e2ba148/
🔥46🏆5❤4👍1
💡💡💡 ‼️ ATTENTION We want to thank everyone, especially the OGs, for supporting us since 2020! 🥰 Separately, we wish to address some FUD floating around about PVR. We want to clarify that the team has been working hard for years with the support of our incredible OGs and community! 💻 We built multiple products as permissionless and self-custodial utilities for any project and received no funds from the community f…
❤59❤🔥5🔥4
💬 Fam, we need to hear your opinions! We regularly perform AAII (Analyse - Adapt - Improve - Implement) to ensure we always stay relevant and on top of everything. It is a powerful tool and a vital strategy, especially in fast-evolving industries such as Web3. After the latest analyses, it has become evident that many projects are moving their presales and token launches to 🔹ETH to benefit from the higher traction.…
🔥56❤2
▶️ SPACE IS LIVE!! Join now: https://x.com/i/spaces/1BRJjPdnyjdKw
🔥43❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @News_PVR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 716,853 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@News_PVR named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProtoVerse News” (@News_PVR), 359 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/News_PVR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.