https://t.me/+kR7oFAxbUC0zN2I1 Join for private guys
❤1🔥1

Channel
@RFD_ERC20
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001727695868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RFD_ERC20 |
| Created | 25 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RFD_ERC20 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 76 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 76 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
176 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 65 | 36.9% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 16.5% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 11.9% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 11.4% | |
| 💩 | 18 | 10.2% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 4.55% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 3.98% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 3.41% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.568% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.568% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2023 to 27 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/+kR7oFAxbUC0zN2I1 Join for private guys
❤1🔥1
REFUND $RFD pinned Deleted message
Join our Best Meme Contest! Share your creative meme about the REFUND on Twitter. Tag our main account @xxx, use the hashtag $RFD, and tag your favorite three influencers for a chance to win 100-300$! We're looking forward to your entries! https://twitter.com/rfd_erc20_?s=21&t=U7ML_969ifW4-rfOGzvdRQ 🥇 : $300 🥈 : $200 🥉 : $100
🔥21💩8❤7💯6🤮4
https://t.me/Shark_Channels/486
🔥8👍2💩2
Buy back and burn 🔥🔥 https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1f4dafb67afb2f6ff622c2f635338720f404544e73f2ee0ae52b22b228db59ea
🤮3❤2👍2
流量置顶 🎒REFUND 🎒$RFD 🎒APED 🎒TRIBUTE TO RFD 🎒NEW REFUND https://www.tradingview.com/x/KNIs5XES/ All the massive run projects from May are running it back, aped $RFD Refund degen for now at just 10k MC We've seen Pepe, Wojak, and several memes revive let's see if REFUND follows suit. Dex: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4A5F741e4F9A18A21F9DD04c37dDb479FAe9788a?chain=ethereum Telegram : https://t.me/RFD_ERC20 Tw…
💩4
Godamnnnn this is sending hard!!!! Clean 10x for @chadleycalls fam. Props to the team & community for pushing this. Cmc has been applied too!! Can see this starting new meta , let’s see!! Am full ready for it🚀🚀 https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4A5F741e4F9A18A21F9DD04c37dDb479FAe9788a?chain=ethereum
👍7🤡6💯5❤3
REFUND $RFD pinned a photo
REFUND CMC SUBMIT !!!
🔥25💯6🫡6❤4💩1🤡1
$RFD Aped 200k MC Exciting news! The original $RFD has been launched by Blurr.eth, an OG whale with a net worth of 9 figures! His wallet is known all over Twitter as a top whale, and he's famous for doing a wash sale of his #9998 Punk for 124k ETH. This revival of $RFD is a tribute to him, and we can't wait to see where it goes! Telegram : https://t.me/RFD_ERC20 Twitter : https://twitter.com/RFD_ERC20 Website : h…
🔥10💯2❤1🤮1😁1
Gambled $RFD here in this dip, heard good team behind it. Decent narrative they got!! Taxes 2/2 Mcap 75k$ Chart : https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4A5F741e4F9A18A21F9DD04c37dDb479FAe9788a?chain=ethereum Tg : https://t.me/RFD_ERC20 Website : http://refundcoin.top/ Dyor / Nfa
👍2❤1💩1
🎒REFUND 🎒$RFD 🎒APED 🎒TRIBUTE TO RFD 🎒NEW REFUND https://www.tradingview.com/x/KNIs5XES/ All the massive run projects from May are running it back, aped $RFD Refund degen for now at just 10k MC We've seen Pepe, Wojak, and several memes revive let's see if REFUND follows suit. Dex: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4A5F741e4F9A18A21F9DD04c37dDb479FAe9788a?chain=ethereum Telegram : https://t.me/RFD_ERC20 Twitter …
❤5👍2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @RFD_ERC20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,095,728 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REFUND $RFD” (@RFD_ERC20), 76 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RFD_ERC20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.