Slow cooking up- just talked w dev about some 🔥 ideas that will make orchard blow up imo… gunna be some exciting news to drop soon

Channel
Based Launches Only
@BasedLaunches
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,835subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001661509297 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BasedLaunches |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BasedLaunches |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 3,835 | -26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 3,861 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 3,870 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:46 | 3,865 | +43 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 3,822 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 3,824 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 3,825 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 3,836 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 3,843 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 3,850 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 3,841 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 3,847 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 3,850 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 3,850 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 5 | 62.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Orchard Buy! 🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏 💰 0.10 ETH ($189.79) 🪙 1,326 SEED 🏷️ Price: $0.1438 🔼 Mkt Cap: $143,828 💧 Liquidity: $48,595.85 🔍 0x776f...0003 ⬆️ Position: +50.29%! Tx | Chart | Web | X | Trending
Also FWIW… If you know orchard dev- done like 10 tokens over 10m one hit 80 and a shit load of shitters since… well earned moniker of serial dev but he does always grind before giving up which is why I call… That being said, he told me + everyone else he’s done launching shitcoins and is in Orchard for the long haul.. and so far seems to be coming through on it. He’s rich and gunna dump money into pushing orchard …
👍1😁1
https://t.me/cove_trading_bot?start=ref_based_launchescb Finallyyyy there’s a bot you can just deposit Usdc and ape every chain, no need to bridge or anything.. been waiting for this for years, missed so many gainzz cause im too lazy to bridge… word on the street this is the best TG bot going for trading
🔥2
https://robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/token/0xaF3D76f1834A1d425780943C99Ea8A608f8a93f9?tab=holders That is pretty crazy tbh
Orchard protocol is the top #9 holder of AAPL on Robinhood!
Jackpot almost 9 appl stocks= $3000 jackpot… chart slowly climbing as more people starting to play the game… nice slow cook here https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x31331be922EA75707b31802b19097332ad9d9026
🔥2
If you waited / DCA’d you’d of done well, coming back now - China waking up?
Aped real smol- call a lil late but let’s see
0x095576f441006679a79a53ddf9136b550095dd1c Gamble here DCA Cz tweet- when he uses common crypto terms the tokens usually do well
Eth actually has a mooner? Lol
🔷 Fake World Assets ($FWA) 🔥#5 ├ 0xa0df17b5ac76ababa36e1450e2cbcd18a620c845 └ #ETH | 9d | 👁️963 📊 Stats ├ USD $0.0261 (+148%) ├ MC $26.12M ├ Vol $5.78M ├ LP $531.1K ├ 1H -19% 🅑114 Ⓢ163 └ ATH $32.95M (-21% / 36m) 🔗 Socials └ 𝕏 [♽] • Web DEF•DS•GT•EXP•𝕏s GM•AXI•OKX•BSD•MAE TRM•PHO•BAN•SIG•COV 😈 dontlookatme1 @ $7.63M [3.4x] (2d) ________________ 05:52 PM · 7/25 UTC
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @BasedLaunches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@CrestTrending · 1,5252 postsBanana Gun Sniper Bot
@BananaGunSniper_bot · 35,8011 postBasedBot
@based_eth_bot · 172,1571 postMaestro
@maestro · 45,3421 postOrchard
@OrchardDotGold · 1261 postPhanes
@Phanes_bot · 70,6801 postPhanes [Gold]
@PhanesGoldBot · 26,6871 postWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,5161 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ETHTRENDING · 43,378
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Based Launches Only” (@BasedLaunches), 3,835 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BasedLaunches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.