Polishing the ClaudeWar.info AI OPERATIVE BETA Dashboards Read more https://x.com/i/status/2086338928089383256 https://x.com/i/status/2086336706207179025 💥 ☝️ 👉 https://ClaudeWar.info/OPERATIVE Monday: All FREE registered accounts upgrade to AI OPERATIVE membership as a TRIAL PERIOD. Create a free account on 👉 https://ClaudeWar.info to benefit 🏆 posts & emails will go out when this period begins. The membership …

Channel
The Blockchain God's Gambles
@TBGgambLes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,480subscribers
+184 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001442000870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TBGgambLes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TBGgambLes |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 5,480 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 5,461 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 5,472 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 5,476 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:23 | 5,475 | +46 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 5,429 | +78 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 5,351 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 5,348 | +19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 5,329 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 5,325 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 5,313 | +25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 5,288 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 5,295 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 5,296 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 29s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
hey! the $CLAUDEWAR ticker finally pulls up the chart on X! https://x.com/TBG_JUST_G/status/2084016958505435335 Docs: https://docs.claudewar.info Telegram: https://t.me/claude_war Discord: https://discord.gg/hQk4mrMYXn $ClaudeWar is KING https://dexscreener.com/solana/CamcPsnFUfDn4VWq6YMSJCMd5EzdKcWV8Yswr3rjEEEA
this is going to millions and it saddens me there are 20k+ people across my telegram communties reading how i improve it and shill it day-in and day-out for months- but there aren't 20k holders. So that means people outside of my community are finding it benefitting from it - don't be that person.
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ $294 CLAUDEWAR BUY! 🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀🛰📡🌞🚀 ➡️ SOL: 4.13 ($294) ⬅️ CLAUDEWAR: 6.4M 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: +31% 📈 Marketcap: $45K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
When most talk of 'KOLs' they think 'Crypto pump and dumps'. When I procure 'KOLs' with ClaudeWar, I aim for long term growth, real influence and impact that brings new liquidity in
OMG. ClaudeWar DEX is working, and the early results are clear. READ MORE: https://x.com/TBG_JUST_G/status/2082622827371397202 🔼💥 The attached images show wins from the last 48 hours. A “win” means a token reached at least 2x from its 1st listing. Docs: https://docs.claudewar.info https://ClaudeWar.info/DEX addresses one of the biggest launchpad problems: organizing massive token feeds in a way that is genuinely …
https://x.com/TBG_JUST_G/status/2082570874528370702
That's what this USA military aircraft is doing as we speak. https://x.com/i/status/2082557779190136945 https://x.com/i/status/2082564060936372539 $ClaudeWar is king 👑 CA 9fnRi189Xd11iz7Hee47mZuxK6wM3zDpsvgsAkgZpump the official utility token for ClaudeWar LLC. This type of data is great for many industries- every industry that can be affected by war time activities to be exact. https://claudeWar.info makes it a…
ClaudeWar just got accepted into Amazon for Startups, too! Wanted to let my community know 1st ❤️ I will keep building Create a free account, explore the globe and the new ClaudeWar DEX https://claudewar.info https://claudewar.info/dex Y Combinator Fall '26 submissions end in a couple hours. Selected projects and companies announced by August 28th! $ClaudeWar is KING https://dexscreener.com/solana/CamcPsnFUfDn4VWq…
❤1
send the og jimothy. https://dexscreener.com/solana/4zlknox7uxazfvhjfeku7i7vrywrtwpjjreleqrul6nf
Nubby & Jimothy like pnut & fred 🔮
UPDATE nubby will send too jimothy almost 40 mil https://dexscreener.com/solana/4zlknox7uxazfvhjfeku7i7vrywrtwpjjreleqrul6nf
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @TBGgambLes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bruiserscalls · 33,412
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@brookcalls · 32,782
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@MaybachCalls · 29,291
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@gubbinscalls · 25,900
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
@lowtaxsolana · 42,531
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
@veigarcalls · 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
@lowtaxbsc · 40,617
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,271
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@CallAnalyserSol · 26,000
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@metacaller · 42,513
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@watisdes · 30,089
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@batman_gem · 22,484
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
@MarkDegens · 23,807
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@MineGems · 31,155
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@arcanegems · 47,229
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@LionCALL · 90,836
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Blockchain God's Gambles” (@TBGgambLes), 5,480 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TBGgambLes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.