Recorded in 2019 as “YVI” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,205–29,285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:24
29,214
-7
11 Aug 2026, 16:14
29,221
-8
10 Aug 2026, 14:23
29,229
-10
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
29,239
-7
8 Aug 2026, 17:44
29,246
-12
7 Aug 2026, 16:04
29,258
-8
6 Aug 2026, 18:40
29,266
-10
6 Aug 2026, 02:00
29,276
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
29,276
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 29,214 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,760
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
21 (29 April 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
31,050
Reactions total
1,159
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,060
Videos
≈33
Links
≈990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,507 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,011
53.4%
🔥
1,070
14.3%
🐳
921
12.3%
❤
733
9.76%
😁
400
5.33%
custom 5463294766693227492
148
1.97%
👎
134
1.79%
custom 5316679430909732521
90
1.20%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
48
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 21 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yivashchenko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📊 Рынок сфокусирован на сегодняшних цифрах по инфляции в США. Несмотря на то, что предыдущая публикация за июнь показала существенное падение инфляции, тема остается острой - рыжий ловелас в июле не угомонился и бомбил Иран. Дошло до того, что он бы уже и не прочь оттуда ноги унести, но Иран не дает. Как бы там ни было, Ормуз остается закрытым, а это создает инфляционное давление даже в условиях падения инфляции и ох…
Рынок продолжает находиться в стрессовом состоянии из-за эскалации на Ближнем Востоке. Реальность такова, что инвесторы зажаты в тиски. С одной стороны - риски ухудшения ситуации и снижения котировок рисковых активов, с другой - при деэскалации, которая может случиться в любой момент, появляется риск упустить рост. Поэтому в реальности ничего не остается как удерживать экспозицию на рисковые активы, хоть как-то контр…
Крипте вчерашние цифры по инфляции понравились - можно выдохнуть, хоть в июле ставка ФРС не будет повышена. Импульсы роста в крипте были сильнее и ярче, чем на фондовом рынке, и такой динамики мы не наблюдали уже давно - обычно было наоборот.
Ситуация с Сейлором тоже можно сказать разрулилась: он активно наращивает запас кэша, который уже перевалил за $3 млрд, поэтому страхи рынка о его неплатежеспособности перевари…
#Макро
🇺🇸US CPI (YoY Jun):
▫️3.5% (прогноз 3.8%, пред. значение 4.2%)
🇺🇸US Core CPI (YoY Jun):
▫️2.6% (прогноз 2.8%, пред. значение 2.9%)
• Инфляция в США наконец развернулась вниз - 3.5% в июне против 4.2% в мае. Первое снижение за пять месяцев, да еще и ниже прогноза в 3.8%. Энергетика замедлилась с 23.5% до 15.7%, бензин с 40.5% до 26.7%, мазут с 58.9% до 42.9%. А главное - в месячном выражении CPI УПАЛ на 0.4%…
⚠️ Майкл SELLor продал 3588 BTC и теперь на балансе компании $2.55 млрд кэша - этого хватит для бесперебойной выплаты дивидендов на 1.5 года.
В подкасте я объяснял, что сейчас это позитивный сигнал. Рынок боялся, что компания не сможет выполнить обязательства по STRC и остановит выплату дивов (на что у нее есть право). Из-за этого STRC пошел в погружение, спровоцировав маржин-колы, и на рынке стояла паника. И рынок …
Послушать аналитику о макро и консенсусе в подкасте было полезно, но прогноз по ключевым активам графически будет нагляднее.
Начнем в этом посте с золота.
Рынок верит в повышение ставки ФРС, доходности трежерей на максимумах, а золото на дне.. все закономерно. Но сейчас есть реальный шанс на излом рыночных ожиданий. А именно излом того, во что верит рынок обычно и дает самые сильные движения и развороты. Дело в том,…
#Подкаст
Поделился своими мыслями о самом важном на рынках и дал прогнозы по ключевым активам.
@yivashchenko
Поддержите лайком, если формат подкаста вам заходит 👍
Меморандум о взаимопонимании между США и Ираном вступил в силу - документ официально подписали в среду (дистанционно). Дональд Трамп лично подписал копию соглашения во время ужина с Макроном в Версальском дворце.
These fools, who think I haven't been tough enough on Iran, when the Stock Market Just Hit A RECORD HIGH, and Oil prices are "tumbling" down, are either jealous, bad people, or stupid. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AG…
Первое выступление Уорша закончилось тем, что никто ничего не понял...
#Макро
• ФРС оставила ставку без изменений, при этом Уорш все выступление уходил от прямых ответов. Конкретики ноль. Но при быстро растущей инфляции три месяца подряд его главной задачей судя по всему было не сказать о повышении ставки - с чем он успешно справился.
• Также новый глава ФРС объявил о создании пяти рабочих групп, которые пересмот…
Риск о котором я говорил - остаться без аллокации под импульсный рост рисковых активов на сделке - реализовался. Сделка есть, официальное подписание в пятницу, после чего Ормуз будет открыт.
🔸В прессе мелькали заголовки, что Трамп спешит заключить сделку к IPO SpaceX или к своему юбилею, но истинная причина текущих сроков в том, о чем я писал уже давно - заседание ФРС. Сами посудите: текущая администрация поставила …
День SpaceX настал и Маск вылетел из списка миллиардеров Forbes. Много шума вокруг этого IPO, и не странно - оно крупнейшее в истории США.
Трамп не подвел своего главного маркетолога и объявил о сделке с Ираном за день до листинга (есть вероятность, что в этот раз не соврал). Плюс дал Уоршу возможность быть более мягким на следующей неделе. Это именно тот сценарий, который мы ранее рассматривали как базовый.
🚬 Хайп…
На этой неделе мы увидели, что инфляция в США продолжает расти. Но из позитивного - базовая инфляция по итогам мая вышла ниже ожиданий, что говорит о том, что проблема пока исключительно в энергетическом шоке и в реальную экономику эффект пока не прилип. Но давайте откровенно - цифры по макро сейчас вообще никак не влияют на ситуацию: ни сильный рынок труда, ни растущая инфляция. Какое это имеет значение, если весь ф…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @yivashchenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 283,549 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IVASCO | Иващенко Юрий” (@yivashchenko), 29,214 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yivashchenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
