Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Устойчивый Коллапс

@sustaincoll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,908subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512552794
TypeChannel
Username@sustaincoll
Created22 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sustaincoll

Growth

1,9081,9091,908.55 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,908 subscribers5 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,908–1,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:511,908-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:351,909no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:451,909first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 1,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
622
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held19 (7 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total3,112
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

377 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24765.5%
8422.3%
🤔266.90%
😁112.92%
😢82.12%
👎10.265%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 377reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC374 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В 2025 году Франция привлекла 69 миллиардов долларов иностранных инвестиций в проекты по созданию дата-центров для ИИ. Это в 2 раза больше, чем Штаты. Так получилось, что во Франции в силу ряда причин наступление мракобесов от энергетики было приостановлено. И положения «Закона о зеленом росте» 2015 года о закрытии к 2025 году, фактически, одной трети атомных реакторов сначала было отложено, а потом и отменено. Пот

👍103🤔3

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

25 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC571 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Еврокомиссия приняла «План действий по электрификации», рассчитанный до 2040 года. До обсуждения содержания документа хотел бы обратить внимание на две вещи: 1. Из-под пера брюссельских энергетических визионеров перестали выходить бумаги, в которых «дискриминируется» ядерная энергия. А то, ведь, года три после принятия Европейской зеленой сделки в их энергетических материалах вообще слово «ядерный» не употреблял

👍138🤔1

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

22 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC771 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Соглашение 123» с Саудовской Аравией не запрещает саудитам проводить обогащение урана (что открывает путь к урановой ядерной бомбе) и перерабатывать отработавшее ядерное топливо (что открывает путь к плутониевой ядерной бомбе). Во время своего первого президенства Трамп пытался передать Эр-Рияду атомные технологии даже без заключения «Соглашения 123», что противоречит американскому законодательству. Тогда это не пр

👍11😁3😢3👎1

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

20 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC697 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://ria.ru/20260720/titov-2105774216.html Спецпредставитель президента РФ по связям с международными организациями для достижения целей устойчивого развития Борис Титов поехал в США обсуждать с тамошними глобалистами «проблемы экстерриториального характера в контексте целей устойчивого развития». Это проблема. Потому что нынешние «цели устойчивого развития» во всех их ипостасях – глобалистский проект по решению

👍86🤔3

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

18 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC699 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Весенняя» иранская война стала прелюдией для майского визита Трампа в Китай. Война «летняя» станет прелюдией для сентябрьского визита председателя Си в Вашингтон. Естественно, что темы на этих переговорах поднимаются глобальные. Итоги весенней кампании явно не помогли Трампу выбить из Китая удовлетворительных условий передела мира. Теперь предстоит второй акт Марлезонского балета. Американцам явно не по душе раз

14👍13🤔1

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

13 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC691 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://rutube.ru/video/761822d60bf352235628d86dab41fb02/ Сдали и мы документы на регистрацию. Сразу скажу, что к разработке и проведению выборной кампании нашей партии я отношения имею очень слабое. Мое внимание было сконцентрировано на «большой» программе. И я буду рад, если эта кампания 2026 года выйдет и на обсуждение важных проблем, которые в ней отражены. Программы политических партий у нас никто не читает. На

👍154

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

9 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC886 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://lenta.ru/news/2026/07/08/putin-podderzhal-ideyu-sozdaniya-malyh-npz-na-fone-situatsii-s-toplivom/ Месяц назад описал свой взгляд на уроки ближневосточной военной компании: «В этом мире надежность системы приобретает большую важность, чем ее эффективность. Децентрализация производства и управления, размещение складов и заводов в тоннелях, вырытых в горных массивах себя оправдали. Если бы иранцы действовали

👍20🤔1😁1

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

3 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC799 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Опубликован долгожданный «Национальный план мероприятий третьего этапа адаптации к изменению климата на период до 2030 года». Готов он, вроде бы, был еще 31 декабря 2025 года. Но опубликован только сейчас, что предполагает нешуточную закулисную борьбу. Вообще, я очень не люблю эти планы по адаптации от Минэкономразвития. Во-первых, за их ужасный дубовый канцелярский язык с кривым синтаксисом. Например, «научное обес

👍92🤔2😁1

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

28 Jun 2026, 04:59 UTC817 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На одном графике цены на электроэнергию во Франции. Красная линия - включая налоги, зеленая - без налогов. На другом - темпы роста цен на электроэнергию начиная с 1960 года (зеленая линия) по сравнению с темпами инфляции - красная пунктирная линия

👍11

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

28 Jun 2026, 04:58 UTC799 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍6🤔32

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

28 Jun 2026, 04:45 UTC758 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Trumps-Nuclear-Gamble-Aims-to-Reshape-the-US-Power-Grid.html Написал статью для одного журнала о французском опыте обеспечения экономики (кстати, рыночной экономики) обильной и дешевой электроэнергией в период с 1945 по 2010 год. Это - год либерализации этого сектора во Франции. И этот опыт был очень примечательный. Во Франции на протяжении нескольких десятков

👍144😢2🤔1

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

22 Jun 2026, 10:16 UTC828 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://kodeks.ru/news/read/otraslevoi-seminar-trudnoizvlekaemye-zapasy-nefti-texnologii-dobyci-i-ekonomiceskaia-celesoobraznost В прошлом месяце в Минэнерго прошел очередной интересный семинар. Он был посвящен трудноизвлекаемым запасам нефти и газа (ТРИЗ). Интерес к ним не случаен. Для поддержания уровня добычи приходится переходить к освоению месторождений с более трудными условиями добычи. Новых «традиционных» ме

👍196🤔3😢3

Signed Igor Alabuzhin

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sustaincoll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 515,038 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Устойчивый Коллапс” (@sustaincoll), 1,908 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sustaincoll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.