9 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,421–10,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:08
10,430
+5
11 Aug 2026, 09:32
10,425
+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:44
10,424
+2
9 Aug 2026, 13:01
10,422
-2
8 Aug 2026, 13:50
10,424
+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
10,422
-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:42
10,424
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:30
10,425
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:24
10,425
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 10,430 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,770
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
15 (5 July 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
30,170
Reactions total
340
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
291
Videos
1
Links
966
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
725 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
571
78.8%
🤔
120
16.6%
👎
34
4.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 725reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Южнокорейские акции стали волатильнее биткойна
По расчетам Bloomberg, историческая волатильность южнокорейского индекса Kospi с начала года заметно выше, чем у биткойна – актива, славящегося своей волатильностью. Для сравнения, индекс японских акций в этом году почти в 2 раза менее волатилен, чем Kospi. Причина – Kospi наполовину состоит из акций всего 2 компаний (Samsung и SK Hynix), оказавшихся в эпицентре бума ин…
Снижение ставки ЦБ пока не повлияло на настроения
пайщиков облигационных ПИФов, но всё в руках управляющих!
7 июля мы писали про то, что в ПИФах рублевых облигаций с фиксированной доходностью начался беспрецедентный отток пайщиков после решения Банка России снизить ставку всего на 0,25%:
❗️Только по пятерке крупнейших ПИФов данной категории наблюдается погашение темпами порядка 4 млрд. рублей в день. Накопленный чис…
Google впервые получил отрицательный free cash flow
Alphabet Inc., материнская компания Google, на прошлой неделе раскрыла отчетность за 2 квартал. Рынку данные не понравились, акции в день публикации упали примерно на 7% и пробили 200-дневную скользящую среднюю. Бизнес чувствует себя прекрасно: выручка основного бизнеса (поиска) выросла на 17% ко 2 кварталу 2025) облачного – даже на 82%, облако Google нарастило дол…
🕊️ Итоги заседания ЦБ превзошли самый оптимистичный прогноз самого большого оптимиста в нашей команде.
На фоне бензинового кризиса и разгона инфляции мы были практически уверены в то, что регулятор возьмет паузу в снижении ставки и скорректирует свои среднесрочные прогнозы макропоказателей, допуская как возобновление цикла снижения, так и повышение ставки в последующем.
В лучшем случае прогнозировали снижение ставк…
Update по портфелю топ-5 идей в зарубежных акциях. Минус Viatris, Плюс Baidu
Незаметно прошла половина лета, 2026 года и три года с момента старта аналитического портфеля Топ-5 идей в зарубежных акциях.
С начала 2026 года Топ-5 уверенно обгоняет бенчмарк с доходом более +20% (против +10% по S&P 500).
Прирост за 3 года превысил +120% по сравнению с +74% по S&P 500).
На фоне сохраняющейся неопределенности и надувше…
Инвестиционная идея №17 на глобальном рынке – акции Baidu
Baidu уже была в Топ-5, оказавшись одной из лучших инвест. идей c результатом +52% (19.02.2025 адр были включены в портфель по цене $88, 17.09.2025 исключены при цене $133,7).
Сейчас адр подешевели до $107,5, но к возобновлению идею побудило не столько цена, сколько качественная трансформация бизнеса Baidu.
Можно сказать, что это уже совершенно другая компа…
Каким будет новый прогноз показателей ЦБ - главная интрига предстоящего заседания
В отношении того, что процесс снижения ставки будет поставлен на паузу мы согласны с консенсусным мнением аналитиков.
Как написали месяц назад,
Риск уже не в паузе (что очевидно, про снижение ставки в этом году можно забыть), а в том, что Банк России может отреагировать на начавшийся бензиновый кризис резким ужесточением монетарной п…
Чистые продажи иностранной валюты крупнейшими экспортерами в июне сократились на 30%.
На прошлой неделе Банк России выпустил очередной обзор рисков финансовых рынков.
Один из наиболее интересных фактов почему-то не был освещен в обзоре и был приведен только в Excel приложении - в июне крупнейшие экспортёры резко сократили продажу нефтедолларов.
В мае они продали $10,9 млрд. - рекорд с февраля 2025 года, что логичн…
Реальные доходности 30-летних US Treasuries достигли нового максимума
Многие СМИ обратили внимание, что на этой неделе аукцион 30-летних номинальных US Treasuries прошел по самой высокой доходности с 2007 года (5,06%). Однако это касается только аукционов: на вторичном рынке доходности номинальных 30-летних бумаг заметно ниже уровней середины мая. Намного интереснее другое – обвал ожидаемой долгосрочной инфляции всл…
Первое повышение ключевой ставки?
Пока аналитики сохраняют надежду, что Банк России продолжит снижение % ставки в этом году, незаметно прошло первое повышение.
❗️Сегодня индикатор RUSFAR, отражающий среднюю ставку по сделкам РЕПО с ЦК вырос до 14,82%!
Это на 0,57% выше, чем ключевая ставка ЦБ (14,25%)! На приведенном графике видно, что ставка РЕПО никогда с начала цикла снижения «ключа», т.е. с лета 2025 года, не пр…
War, Wealth & Wisdom pinned «06/2026 Результаты фондов под управлением УК Арикапитал за месяц Июнь оказался одним из худших месяцев для российского фондового рынка с 2022 года. Падение цен на нефть, атаки украинских БПЛА на предприятия в глубине российской территории, разочаровавшее…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @warwisdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое решение, по Вашему мнению, примет Банк России на ближайшем заседании 24 июля 2026 года?
Повысит ставку4%
Оставит ставку без изменения на уровне 14,25%, допуская её повышение в будущем44%
Оставит ставку без изменения на уровне 14,25%, прогнозируя возобновление снижения после паузы23%
Снизит ставку20%
Хочу посмотреть ответы9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 186,482 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“War, Wealth & Wisdom” (@warwisdom), 10,430 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warwisdom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
