Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Союз Спасения Сбережений Россиян (СССР)

@angrybonds2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,132subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002538049363
TypeChannel
Username@angrybonds2
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/angrybonds2

Growth

2,1322,1362,1346 August 2026 — 2,135 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,135 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,134 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,132 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,131–2,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:532,132-2
9 Aug 2026, 13:112,134-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:122,136+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:162,135no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:042,135first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.8%
avg views ÷ 2,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.496%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total9,678
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7142.0%
2917.2%
👍2414.2%
🔥1911.2%
🤝105.92%
🤔42.37%
👀31.78%
👎21.18%
😱21.18%
❤‍🔥10.592%
👌10.592%
👏10.592%
😢10.592%
🫡10.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,060 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На дивы от ВТБ купил: 1️⃣ ВТБ 2️⃣ МТС 3️⃣ Татнефть 4️⃣ ЮНИПРО 5️⃣ еще какую-то фигню по мелочи. Ни о чем не жалею, жду на следующий год 10-11 рублей дивов по ВТБ и 36-38 по МТС. Так ПобедимЪ

🔥10😁4

4 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC702 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#бетон_портфель сколько алкоголика не зашивай, а он все равно покупает Эталон. Усредняется. На дивы от Дома РФ в том числе. Ни ЗПИФы его не манят ни что другое.

😁9

3 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC456 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @angrybonds

#чеболизация Как говорится там у более или менее молодежи: да, перешли, и что?) Как отмечается в сообщении ВТБ Мои Инвестиции, во втором квартале 2026 года инвесторы изменили поведение на рынке акций: несмотря на сезонное снижение общего оборота торгов, объем нетто-покупок среди клиентов брокера вырос почти в 6 раз по сравнению с первым кварталом. При этом ключевая тенденция второго квартала — концентрация спроса на

1👍1

31 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,180 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#золотце_моё Само по себе золото стабилизировалось, но в июле некстати задристал Полюс. Если бы не купоны от Голдекса, то спад был бы сильнее, а так болтались в районе нуля. На контрасте с предыдущими событиями в целом даже и ничего) продолжаем наблюдения.

😁53🤔2

31 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,180 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#бетон_портфель Наконец-то перестали падать, даже чуть подросли за счет дивидендов от Циана и ЛСР. По итогу +0,9% в месяц. ПИК продал, заменил на ДОМ-РФ, добавил также Эталона. ПИФы просели, но не критично, примерно в меру полученных дивидендов. Списанный Тоннекс выходил на связь, заверял, что все вернет, но неизвестно когда. Если вернет так восстановим, пока без него,

👍31

31 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, Дмитрий! Последний день июля, рассказываю. Пришли купоны от ПГК, ничего не покупала, прибыль за июль 1,2%. Кому сказать спасибо, не знаю. Живем дальше.

🔥31👍1

28 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @angrybonds

#гнетущее_ДКП 13,5% от ВТБ на конец года, равно как и 13,25% при сохранении нынешнего шага - это конечно так себе перспектива для рынка. Но я бы не сбрасывал со счетов возможность кадровых решений. В этом случае ожидания будут какое-то время зашкаливать. Правда я всё равно не верю в ставку ниже 10% к концу года ни при каких, даже самых фантастических назначениях. С нулевым ростом ВВП все похоже смирились, с растуще

2🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,730 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @finbazarPhoto

Почему рубль больше не слабеет, а доллар теряет статус главной валюты мира, и как обычному человеку хранить сбережения в новой реальности? Поговорили честно про курс рубля, дедолларизацию, золото, валютные коридоры и стратегии сохранения капитала, когда мир фрагментируется на валютные зоны. В гостях у соведущей подкаста БАЗАР Виктории Барановой — Дмитрий Адамидов, автор Telegram-канала Angry Bonds, экономист, незав

👍5😁3❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,000 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @angrybonds

С "акциями стоимости" тоже не все просто. И не только потому что дивидендов иной раз не хватает. Вчера на дне инвестора МГКЛ открытым текстом сказал что отдает приоритет байбэку перед дивидендами. Это не значит что дивидендов не будет совсем, но акценты явно смещаются на фоне низкой оценки рынка и распродаж. Да и байбэк более прост в организации. Дивы котировки не вытянут, выкуп же могут поддержать плюс если менеджм

👍51

10 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC927 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @angrybonds

Мне кажется как раз на текущем историческом этапе будет наибольший пересмотр понятия "акции роста" Не конкретно Озона или Яндекса (с ними как раз может ничего и не произойдет), а скорее сложившейся практики оценки компаний (особенно IT) на основе идей "голубых океанов" и ошеломляющих перспектив, которые в 80% случаев оказываются галлюцинациями менеджмента и акционеров. Поговорим в том числе и об этом об этом завт

2

8 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,360 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Золотой портфель получил ещё одну пробоину.👇

😁2🤝1🫡1

8 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,370 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarketPENA

Как называется минор Полюса после анонса дивидендной засухи в компании и фокусировке на проектах роста? - сухой лох 😁 Рыночная Пена

😁25🤝9🔥4😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @angrybonds2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTCAnonymous Poll343 voters

Добирали сегодня ВТБ?

  1. Да15%
  2. Нет41%
  3. Продавал по маржин-колу1%
  4. Никогда не брал и не беру28%
  5. Жду еще ниже а там точно возьму19%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 589,821 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Союз Спасения Сбережений Россиян (СССР)” (@angrybonds2), 2,132 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angrybonds2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.