Экономическое развитие России
Офиц. канал Института экономики роста им. Столыпина
Cвязь: [email protected]
Сайт: https://stolypin.institute
Дзен: http://dzen.ru/stolypin_institute
МАХ: https://max.ru/stolypin2
VK: https://vk.com/stolypinins
Created
13 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net +237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,558–36,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 13:16
35,930
-2
9 Nov 2026, 01:51
35,932
+5
7 Nov 2026, 20:47
35,927
-9
6 Nov 2026, 17:55
35,936
-5
5 Nov 2026, 16:58
35,941
+4
4 Nov 2026, 15:07
35,937
+3
3 Nov 2026, 16:08
35,934
+7
2 Nov 2026, 18:14
35,927
-1
1 Nov 2026, 15:11
35,928
-6
31 Oct 2026, 15:27
35,934
-1
30 Oct 2026, 16:46
35,935
-4
29 Oct 2026, 16:06
35,939
+2
28 Oct 2026, 17:35
35,937
+2
27 Oct 2026, 18:26
35,935
+5
26 Oct 2026, 20:10
35,930
+13
25 Oct 2026, 23:45
35,917
-12
25 Oct 2026, 02:44
35,929
+13
24 Oct 2026, 00:06
35,916
-1
23 Oct 2026, 01:25
35,917
-5
21 Oct 2026, 22:36
35,922
first reading
Engagement
155 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 35,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,140
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 155 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
155 (21 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
184,950
Reactions total
1,916
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈817
Videos
≈41
Links
≈1,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 42s
Average length
5m 26s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,455 reactions across 153 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,192
25.9%
❤
2,047
24.2%
🤔
1,983
23.5%
👏
1,755
20.8%
🔥
183
2.16%
💯
147
1.74%
😁
52
0.615%
🤬
34
0.402%
😱
23
0.272%
🤯
13
0.154%
😢
12
0.142%
🤝
9
0.106%
💔
5
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,512 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (38.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Глобальный Юг меняет экономическую карту мира. И у Кубани есть шанс занять на ней заметное место
Мировая конкуренция за инвестиции, технологии и производства всё больше перемещается на уровень городов. И здесь Москва оказалась в числе лидеров: российская столица заняла третье место среди 30 городов Глобального Юга по условиям для развития бизнеса и промышленности, уступив только Сингапуру и Шанхаю. К такому выводу п…
В продолжение темы о том, стоит ли работникам умственного труда бояться конкуренции со стороны искусственного интеллекта
Новостной канал «Без шума, но по делу» со ссылкой на Ведомости сообщил о тренде под названием «ИИ-бумеранг». Он заключается в том, что мировые компании начали возвращать в штат сотрудников после попыток автоматизировать их функции с помощью искусственного интеллекта.
В ходе эксплуатации выяснилос…
Суд, с которого начался рынок информации
Все знают Гутенберга как отца печатного станка. Все знают, что стало с миром после его изобретения. Но мало кто знает, что 6 ноября 1455 года в Майнце нотариус Ульрих Хельмаспергер оформил документ о судебном споре между Иоганном Гутенбергом и Иоганном Фустом. Человек, подаривший нам взрыв знаний, стал жертвой венчурного капитализма. Бумага сохранилась и сегодня считается одн…
О чем мы писали на этой неделе: дайджест Столыпин 2.0
Валютная часть золотовалютных резервов России составила 436 млрд долларов
Индекс ведущих китайских компаний в области ИИ и чипов за четыре месяца потерял 40%
Сверхжесткая денежно-кредитная политика - фактор, разгоняющий инфляцию и сдерживающий экономический рост: свежие результаты опроса РСПП
Жильё доступное, но некачественное. Или качественное, но недоступное…
Главные экономические новости недели по версии экспертов Института Столыпина
Дайджест за 2 - 6 ноября 2026 года
📢 По итогам промежуточных выборов 3 ноября, по оценке NBC News, демократы получают 255 мест в Палате представителей и не меньше 51 из 100 в Сенате, отвоевав в том числе кресла в Северной и Южной Каролине, Техасе, Канзасе, Айове и Огайо. Трамп заявил, что не считает итоги личным поражением, напомнил о пра…
Жильё доступное, но некачественное. Или качественное, но недоступное. Как решить проблему?
В ИНП РАН оценили жилищные условия населения в регионах России по нескольким критериям. Эксперты проанализировали их по жилищной обеспеченности населения, качеству и уровню благоустройства жилищного фонда, объему строительства жилья, доле аварийного фонда и др. Получилась вот такая картина:
🏠 Более половины россиян — 53,5% — …
🇷🇺 С Днём народного единства🌿
Экономике, как и хорошей команде, важно действовать в одном направлении: развивать производства и производительность труда, стремиться к новым высоким планкам и поддерживать перспективные проекты.
В этой работе не обойтись без единения и сотрудничества между всеми институтами – бизнесом, властью, обществом. А решения, которые усиливают друг друга и открывают пространство для роста, при…
Сверхжесткая денежно-кредитная политика сама по себе становится фактором, разгоняющим темпы роста цен, не говоря уже о сдерживании экономического роста. О чём в очередной раз свидетельствует опрос РСПП, свежие результаты которого опубликовали «Ведомости».
Деньги дорогие — спрос страдает, так же как и платёжная дисциплина.
Заказчики задерживают платежи, нужно больше оборотки, но за кредиты приходится дорого платить.…
Восемь тысяч желающих на одну акцию
Когда в августе китайский производитель роботов Unitree вышел на биржу, заявок набралось в 8000 раз больше, чем акций. Люди покупали не бумагу, а образ будущего. Сегодня эти акции стоят примерно вдвое дешевле, чем в начале торгов. Это один эпизод из большой истории о том, как Китай переоценил скорость, с которой ИИ превращается в деньги.
Индекс ведущих китайских компаний в област…
Валютная часть золотовалютных резервов России, по последним официальным данным, – 436 млрд долларов (из примерно 730 млрд ЗВР в целом)
Бывало и больше, но уровень все равно очень солидный. Правда, около $300 млрд российских суверенных резервов остаются заблокированными в западных юрисдикциях.
Ключевым компонентом доступной части резервов — наряду с золотом и наличной валютой – выступает юань. Институт экономики рос…
Верняк, в который верят все
«Для парня, который ставит только на верняк, я решил поставить все на неопределенность». Эту сакраментальную фразу произносит Сэм «Туз» Ротштейн в «Казино» Скорсезе. Она отражает то, что случилось с людьми 29 октября 1929 года. В тот день наступил Черный вторник, он стал началом Великой депрессии в США. Про нее написаны тысячи страниц, а мы посмотрим на это событие глазами человека, котор…
Главные экономические новости недели по версии экспертов Института Столыпина
Дайджест за 26 – 30 октября 2026 года
📢 На протяжении всей недели в Москве проходили саммиты. Только на саммит «Россия-Африка» в столицу приехали делегации 48 стран, из них 22 возглавили главы государств. Товарооборот с ними в $27 млрд (рост в полтора раза с прошлого саммита), а доля национальных валют в расчетах оценивается в 85%. Постав…
👍27❤12👏8🤔7
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @stolypin2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@stolypin2 edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @stolypin2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сделки сократились вдвое, крупные инвестиции получают единицы: что происходит с российским венчурным рынком?
💀 Венчур почти умер — остались точечные сделки «для своих»63%
🎯 Рынок очистился — деньги идут к действительно сильным проектам11%
🤖 ИИ всех спасет — новый цикл инвестиций начнется вокруг технологий10%
Это пауза — после снижения ставок рынок снова резко оживет17%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@stolypin2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@khazin named in 9 posts, 19 September 2026 – 30 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бла-бла-номика @blablanomika · 46,622 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Страна возможностей @strana_vozmozhnostei · 24,320 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Фестивальный @festivalny · 24,148 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
ПроПром @ruproprom · 39,554 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Повестка @povestka_ru · 26,645 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Дерипаска @olegderipaska · 115,845 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
ЮЖНЫЙ КРАЙ | ДОНБАСС, НОВОРОССИЯ @uzh_kraj · 50,626 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Архипелаг БИГТЕХ @arhbigtech · 23,953 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Инго Банк @ingobankru · 23,093 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
ТеZис @tethis · 42,159 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Номенклатура @nomenclatura · 58,021 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Хайлайт | Новости @h1ghl1ghts · 68,777 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Минправды @minpravda · 62,284 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Андрей Vышинский @a_vyshinskiy · 58,959 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Столыпин 2.0” (@stolypin2), 35,930 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stolypin2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.