Достоверно о событиях в отраслях и компаниях ТЭК с актуальными оттенками геополитики, экономики и экологической перчинкой
✅ Зарегистрирован РКН
MAX https://max.ru/channel_energytoday ; сайт https://energytoday.pro/
🎙@EnergyTodayRedactor
Created
7 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 24% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net +315. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,882–24,296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 05:40
24,248
+49
19 Sept 2026, 08:56
24,199
+2
16 Sept 2026, 22:01
24,197
+7
13 Sept 2026, 06:37
24,190
+13
11 Sept 2026, 06:01
24,177
-16
8 Sept 2026, 07:38
24,193
+22
5 Sept 2026, 01:19
24,171
+13
3 Sept 2026, 09:27
24,158
-2
2 Sept 2026, 06:43
24,160
-7
1 Sept 2026, 03:43
24,167
-8
31 Aug 2026, 05:13
24,175
+6
30 Aug 2026, 08:34
24,169
+2
28 Aug 2026, 06:33
24,167
+12
27 Aug 2026, 03:54
24,155
+7
26 Aug 2026, 03:03
24,148
+9
25 Aug 2026, 05:24
24,139
+10
24 Aug 2026, 05:04
24,129
+14
22 Aug 2026, 16:25
24,115
-14
21 Aug 2026, 03:46
24,129
-16
20 Aug 2026, 06:47
24,145
first reading
Engagement
488 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.4%
avg views ÷ 24,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,610
121 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
121
of 488 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
488 (4 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
920,490
Reactions total
1,474
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,550
Videos
≈128
Links
≈12,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,401 reactions across 465 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,761
27.5%
😁
1,739
27.2%
❤
879
13.7%
🔥
614
9.59%
🤬
598
9.34%
👎
178
2.78%
😱
170
2.66%
👏
148
2.31%
🤯
115
1.80%
😢
108
1.69%
🎉
77
1.20%
🤩
14
0.219%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 485 of the 488 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 488 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 487 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @energytodaygroup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 488 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Банк России разрешил банкам применять понижающие коэффициенты при расчете величины кредитного риска по ссудам, выдаваемым на финансирование проектов по обеспечению защиты объектов критической инфраструктуры от угроз воздушного нападения
Понижающие коэффициенты установлены в размере: 30% для заемщиков инвесткласса; 50% для иных заемщиков
Регулятор отмечает, что банки смогут экономить капитал при кредитовании таких п…
Губернатор Эбботт объявил в Техасе чрезвычайное положение из-за цен на дизельное топливо сроком на 30 дней с возможностью продления
Цена дизеля в Техасе в среднем составляет $5,86 за галлон
• Режим ЧП позволит расширить использование «окрашенного дизеля» (без налогов) фермерами на дорогах общего пользованияТехаса,
• приостановить правила «Texas Low Emission Diesel» (программа, которая регулирует качество дизельного…
«Китай - США» потепление?!
Китай объявил о снижении тарифов на ряд сельскохозяйственных товаров из США, включая зерновые, соевые продукты и животные белки, за исключением товарной сои. Есть важная оговорка.
Снижение тарифов будет осуществлено одновременно после завершения обеими странами внутренних правовых процедур. Дата вступления в силу не указана.
Снижение тарифов является частью соглашения о взаимном снижении…
Власти США могут разрешить продажу «окрашенного» дизельного топлива на обычных АЗС для снижения цен
Согласно действующим федеральным правилам, налог на дизельное топливо для автомобильных дорог составляет 24,4 цента за галлон, в то время как «окрашенное» (с красным красителем) дизельное топливо освобождено от этого налога. Сейчас цветное топливо предназначено для сельхозтехники. Его использование в автомобилях, выез…
Роснедра в 2027 году приступят к количественной оценке российских ресурсов по углеводородному сырью, сообщила начальник управления геологии нефти и газа, подземных вод и сооружений Роснедр Нина Ерофеева.
"Переоценка обычно идет два года: думаю, что в 2029-м мы утвердим уже новые данные о ресурсах", - сказала Ерофеева в кулуарах конференции "Подземные воды. Подземные сооружения 2026"
Energy Today без VPN: MAX / сайт
Госсекретарь по энергетической безопасности Великобритании Миатта Фанбулле заявила, что финансировать энергопереход нужно не из тарифов, а из налогов всех граждан. По её мнению, что позволит более справедливо распределить расходы среди жителей страны.
Изъятие расходов на модернизацию и развитие энергосистемы из тарифов для граждан позволит экономить в среднем £120 в год на домохозяйство, но мог бы повлечь за собой п…
И еще раз о децентрализации размещения ЦОДов
Минэнерго РФ предлагает дифференцировать центры обработки данныхпо функциональному назначению и перенести часть из них в регионы с холодным климатом и профицитом генерации, рассказал замминистра энергетики РФ Эдуард Шереметцев на форуме BIS Summit 2026.
По его словам, ЦОДы, которые требуют реалтайма, действительно должны находиться рядом с потребителем. «Но есть дата-цен…
«Россети» завершили технологическое присоединение к Единой национальной электрической сети Южно‑Якутской ТЭС. В энергосистему включена новая тепловая станция парогазового цикла – созданы все условия для выдачи мощности ее первого этапа в объеме 220 МВт.
На втором этапе на станции будет установлена еще одна паровая турбина 110 МВт – таким образом, общая мощность Южно‑Якутской ТЭС достигнет 330 МВт. В рамках этого пла…
Правительство РФ разрабатывает программу развития центров обработки данных, которая будет предусматривать как вопросы их проектирования, так и обеспечения электроэнергией, заявил на "Московском стартап саммите" вице-премьер Дмитрий Григоренко
Российский рынок дата-центров растет 15-20% в год, но этого недостаточно, уверен Григоренко
Да, программа нужна. Недавно писали, что в столичных дата-центрах спрос на серверны…
Геотермальный стартап Fervo Energy запустила первый «геоблок» мощностью 33 МВт на своей электростанции Cape Station в штате Юта
В четверг Fervo официально начнет коммерческую эксплуатацию, поставляя электроэнергию компании Shell Energy, выполняющей функции энергосбытовой компании в Калифорнии.
Компания планирует ввести еще два «геооблока» мощностью по 33 МВт каждый к 1 января 2027 года. Мощности еще на 400 МВт по с…
Греки устремились в соседние страны за более дешёвым топливом
Греческие СМИ пишет, что в Македонии бензин дешевле на 60 центов, а дизельное топливо – на 54. В Болгарии бензин можно купить меньше не 56 центов а дизельное топливо — на 33.
Уже пишут, что заправка 40-литрового бака в Греции поглощает немалую часть ежемесячного дохода граждан и приближает страну к показателям стран со значительно меньшим ВВП.
Да, и зап…
В Норвегии тоже рекорд стоимости дизельного топлива
Вчера дизельное топливо стоило 31,49 кроны (₽279,63) за литр на более чем 100 заправках Circle K.
– Это самая высокая цена за топливо, которую мы когда-либо регистрировали, – заявил Сивер Орхаген, руководитель Fuel App
1 сентября 2026 года снижение топливного налога в стране было отменено, и с тех пор цены только растут. Высокие цены вызвали политический конфликт…
👍15🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 488 posts we hold for @energytodaygroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@energytodaygroup edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 488 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 83 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 95 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Нефть и Капитал I Новости Нефтегазовой отрасли @oil_capital · 22,016#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Нефть и Капитал I Новости Нефтегазовой отрасли @oil_capital · 22,016 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Сырьевая игла @needleraw · 20,397 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
Газ-Батюшка @papagaz · 110,053 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Графономика @topinfographic · 20,037 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Высокое напряжение | энергетика @riseofelectro · 27,381 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 11 September 2026
ИнфоТЭК @Infotek_Russia · 32,340 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
ГазМяс @gazmyaso · 48,445 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
"Нефтегазовая игра" с Александром Фроловым @OilGasGame · 24,878 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Буровая @Burovaia · 41,141 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Пронедра @pronedraru · 21,678 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Нефтебаза @nefte_baza · 36,202 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Газпром @gazprom · 38,667 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
Coala @Coala_russia · 28,661 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Грузопоток @gruz0potok · 36,973 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Экология | Энергетика | ESG @ecologia_i_energetika · 56,962 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Россети @rosseti_official · 25,373 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Энергия+ | Онлайн-журнал @energyplusmedia · 52,042 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Физики и Юрики @FizAndYur · 27,741 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
СИБУР @siburofficial · 28,636 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Газпром нефть @gazpromneft_official · 47,734 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
НА-ГОРА. Угольная аналитика @nagora_coalanalytics · 20,936 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
Газ для России @gasification_news · 48,381 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Россети Московский регион @rossetimr_ru · 22,157 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Ростехнадзор @gosnadzorru · 28,160 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Energy Today” (@energytodaygroup), 24,248 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/energytodaygroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.